<<
>>

definition of communication of a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child with type affective making polorolevoj identity

In the given section is checked a hypothesis a private hypothesis 3: the floor of the significant parent and a psychological floor in the childhood are the important factors of formation affective making polorolevoj identity.

For this purpose reliability of differences of elections gederov the Parent and the Child in female and man's samples is checked; correlation factors between types affective making polorolevoj identity and elections of genders of the Parent and the Child in female and man's samples pay off. Female sample

Results of the one-factorial variance analysis of given tab. 3.7 and 3.8 for female sample show, that at a significance value а=0,01 for three types resulted in the table affective making polorolevoj identity differences in a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child are authentic: for a choice of a gender of Parent Gemp=4,5> Гкр=2,94, and for a choice of a gender of Child Gemp=6,045> Гкр=2,94.



Table 3.8

Affective components polorolevoj identity and kognitivnyj a gender choice

The child in female groups

Adequate and is adequate-not differentiated

Inadequate and is inadequate-not differentiated



Results of calculations of factors of correlation between type affective making polorolevoj identity and elections of genders of the Parent and the Child are resulted in the Appendix 6 in chapter 3. The analysis of character of correlation communications for female sample has shown the following.

Adequate femininnyj the type affective making polorolevoj identity is not bound to a choice of a floor of the Parent and strongly bound to a choice of a sex of a child of a male (r=0,7).

Androginnyj the type affective making polorolevoj identity at women directly also is strongly bound to a choice of the Parent of an opposite sex (г=0,82), and the Child of the floor (g = 0,8).

The undifferentiated type affective making polorolevoj identity is negatively bound to a choice of the Parent of an opposite sex (g =-0,70) and weakly bound to a choice of a sex of a child.

Thus, a choice of a floor of the Parent and a choice of a sex of a child - two factors which are bound to type affective a component polorolevoj identity in female sample. Mutual influence of both factors in female groups it is not established.

Man's sample

Results of the one-factorial variance analysis for man's sample (and 3.10) show tab. 3.9, that at a significance value а=0,01 differences in a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child for three types affective making polorolevoj identity in man's groups are authentic: for a choice of a floor of Parent Temp=15,18> Ткр=2,94, for a choice of a sex of a child - Тэмп=13,06> Бкр=2,935.

Table 3.9

Affective components polorolevoj identity and kognitivnyj a choice of a gender of the Parent in man's groups

Adequate and is adequate-undifferentiated

Inadequate and is inadequate-undifferentiated



Table 3.10

Affective components polorolevoj identity of women and kognitivnyj a choice of a gender of the Child in man's groups



Results of calculations of factors of correlation between type affective making polorolevoj identity and elections of genders of the Parent and the Child are resulted in the Appendix 6 in chapter 3.
The analysis of character of correlation communications for man's sample has shown the following.

Adequate type man's affective making polorolevoj identity it is direct and sredne it is bound to a choice of the Parent of the floor (r = 0,5) and it is direct and moderate with a choice of the Child of the floor (r=0,32) and it is moderately negative with the child of an opposite sex (r = - 0,4). Last result will be compounded with J.I.Aleshinoj and A.S.Volovich's data (J.I.Aleshina, A.S.Volovich, 1991), asserting, that construction man's polorolevoj is faster than identity as negation of all female, than orientation to all man's.

Androginnyj the type affective making polorolevoj identity sredne is negatively bound to a choice of the Parent of an opposite sex (r =-0,52) and is moderately negative - with a choice of the Child of the floor (r =-0,33).

Undifferentiated type affective making polorolevoj identity it is direct and sredne it is bound to a choice of the Parent of an uncertain floor (r=0,52) and it is weakly bound to a choice of an uncertain sex of a child.

Thus, in female and man's groups the choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child are bound to type affective making polorolevoj identity, hence, a private hypothesis 3 floor of the significant parent and a psychological floor in the childhood are the factors bound with affective making polorolevoj of identity it is possible to consider proved.

Such the images, two private hypotheses are proved, hence, it is possible to consider proved a hypothesis 3: the factors bound with affective making polorolevoj of identity, the floor of the significant parent and a psychological floor in the childhood are emotional okrashennost images of the Man and the Woman.

Uniting to influence of all factors, we will note the following.

1) Positivity of an image of the Man in man's sample is directly bound with adequate affective making polorolevoj identity. Negativity of an image of the Man is bound with adequate affective making polorolevoj identity at women.

2) Positivity of an image of the Woman at men and women directly also is closely bound androginnym type affective making polorolevoj identity, however women simultaneously should have positive images of the Man and the Child.

3) Kognitivnyj the choice of the Parent of the floor is directly bound with adequate affective making polorolevoj identity in man's sample and is weak - in female.

4) Kognitivnyj the choice of the Child of a male is directly bound with adequate affective making polorolevoj identity in man's and female samples.

5) High level undifferentiated affective making polorolevoj identity in some man's and female groups is combined with inadequate kognitivnym a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child that corresponds to the results received in work (E.T.Sokolova, N.S., Burlakova, F.Leontiu, 2002) which show communication of a phenomenon of diffusive gender identity with uncertain kognitivnym style of the person.

Conclusions

1) the Taped vozrastno-psychological and gender features affective okrashennosti images of the man and the woman are shown that emotional okrashennost an image of the man at both genders is stable and does not depend on age, and the image of the woman undergoes various changes depending on a gender: at women with the years changes in wide enough range, and at men remains stable, remaining mainly positive

2) the Factors causing formation adequate maskulinnoj affective making polorolevoj of identity at the man is positive okrashennost an image of the man and the positive relation to the parent of the floor. At the woman adequate femininnaja the affective component polorolevoj identity is bound to negative image of the man. The factor necessary for formation affective making polorolevoj for identity androginnogo of type for both genders is positive okrashennost images of the man and the woman.
<< | >>
A source: Izhvanova E.M.. Development polorolevoj identity at youthful and mature age. 2004

More on topic definition of communication of a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child with type affective making polorolevoj identity:

  1. Communication of affective character of images of the Man and the Woman with affective making polorolevoj identity
  2. the factors bound with affective making polorolevoj of identity
  3. Vozrastno-psychological features affective making polorolevoj identity
  4. gender features affective making polorolevoj identity
  5. concept affective making polorolevoj identity of the person
  6. Features of a choice of a floor of the Parent and the Child in various age and gender groups
  7. the Substantiation and the technique description kognitivnogo a choice of a floor of the parent and the child
  8. Vozrastno-psychological features kognitivnogo a choice of genders of the Parent and the Child
  9. definition of the identity bound to a floor
  10. formation Theories polorolevoj identity
  11. Problems of mutual relation of floors and polorolevoj identity
  12. problems of identity the persons bound to a floor
  13. Izhvanova. E.M.development polorolevoj identity at youthful and mature age, 2004