<<
>>

3.4. A quantitative estimation of the Moscow area and Krasnodar territory on productivity of non-material factors of development of economy

Comparative quantitative estimation of the Moscow area and Krasnoyodarsky edge on productivity of non-material factors for economy development we will conduct on the basis of resulted in tables 3.4 and 3.5 indicators.

These indicators characterise dynamics of development of the cores otyoraslej economy of considered regions during the period with 201 5 for 201 7 years.

Indicators of development of the basic branches of economy of Krasnodar territory in 2015-2017 are presented in table 3.4.

Table 3.4. Indicators of development of the basic branches of economy of Krasnodar territory and

The Moscow area

Indicator Region Amendment unit 2015 2016 2017
Volume promyshlen - The Krasnodar Billion 836,8 / 874,4 / 940,3 /
nogo productions / Edge Rbl. / 87236 85370 86000
Number zanjayo

tyh

The Moscow region The people 2 036 721 /

308,9

2 221 631 /

310, 8

2 366 164 /

483,5

Volume promyshlenyonogo productions Krasnodar territory Million rbl. 9,60 10,20 1090
Counting on one taken The Moscow region 6,59 7,15 4,89
The Krasnodar Billion 289,7 / 333,5 / 420,9 /
Edge Rbl. / 376,1 374,0 371,8

Indicator Region Amendment unit 2015 2016 2017
Volume agricultural proizyovodstva / chislen - The Moscow region Thousand people 90,0 / 244,5 119,36 /

245,4

127,3 /

234,6

nost the taken
Volume agricultural proizyovodstva in account Krasnodar territory Million rbl. 0,80 0,90 1,10
On one taken The Moscow region 0,37 0,49 0,54
Cost vypol - The Krasnodar Billion 287,6 / 225,5 / 226,8 /
nennyh the builder - Edge Rbl.
/
159,4 161,0 161,2
nyh works / koliche - The Moscow region Thousand 314325,8 / 529456,4 / 665,843,3 /
stvo the taken The people 39 378 43 010 39962
Cost vypolyonennyh the builder - Krasnodar territory Million rbl. 1,80 1,40 1,41
nyh works in account The Moscow region 7,98 12,3 16,66
On one taken
Transport and communication / The Krasnodar Billion 479,5 / 474,6 / 494,9 /
Quantity of the taken Edge Rbl. / 205,5 200,3 200,2
The Moscow region Thousand people 109655 /

157 327

137431 /

159 404

151256 /

153 056

Transport and communication of works counting on Krasnodar territory Million rbl. 2,33 2,37 2,47
One taken The Moscow region 0,69 0,86 0,99
Total amount proyoizvodstva in account Krasnodar territory Million rbl. 2,29 2,29 2,54
On one taken The Moscow region 2,16 3,29 4,23

According to the designations accepted in items 1.4, we will believe: q11 (q21) - industrial output of Krasnodar territory (the Moscow area) counting on one taken;

q12 (q22) - volume of an agricultural production of Krasnodar territory (the Moscow area) counting on one taken;

q13 (q23) - volume of civil work of Krasnodar territory (the Moscow area) counting on one taken;

q14 (q24) - volume of a telecommunication service and transportation services of Krasnodar territory (the Moscow area) counting on one taken;

q1 (q2) - total amount of production of Krasnodar territory (the Moscow area) counting on one taken.

ββ (t) - a share of influence of a technological level of production in Krasnoyodarsky edge (i =1) and the Moscow area (i=2) on a deviation j-й components of an indicator (1.25) from its average significance;

β∣ (t) - a share of influence of an environment in Krasnodar territory (i =1) and the Moscow area (i=2) on a deviation j-й components of an indicator (1.25) from its average significance;

βj (t) - a share of influence of non-material factors in Krasnodar territory (i =1) and the Moscow area (i=2) on a deviation j-й components of an indicator (1.25) from its average significance.

The index jпри it accepts significances:

For industrial production j=1;

For an agricultural production j=2;

For building j=3;

For transportation services and a telecommunication service j=4.

On the basis of expert judgements it is established, that regarding industrial production variation numbers (1.28) for Krasnodar territory and Moskovyosky area coincide and look like:

β1 (t)> β! (t)> βfl (t), і = 1,2. (3.1)

Regarding agriculture a variation number (1.28) with reference to Krasnodar territory looks like:

β⅛ (t)> β⅛)> βl2 (t), (3.2)

And with reference to the Moscow area — a kind:

β212 (t)> β322 (t)> β2At). (3.3)

Regarding building a variation number (1.28) with reference to Krasyonodarsky edge looks like:

β13 (t)> β133 (t)> β123 (t), (3.4)

And with reference to the Moscow area - a kind:

β233 (t)> β2l3 (t)> β223 (t). (3.5)

Regarding transport and communication variation numbers (1.28) for Krasnodaryosky edge and the Moscow area coincide and look like:

(3.6.)

β (t)> β (t)> βi4 (t), і = 1,2.

Received on the basis of variation numbers (3.1) - (3.6), significances veliyochin βj (t) are presented in table 3.5.

Table 3.5.

Factors of influence of non-material factors on the economic

Indicators of Krasnodar territory and the Moscow area

Region Economy branches
promyshyo

lennost

Agriculture Building Transport and communication
Krasnodar territory 1/6 1/6 1/3 1/6
The Moscow area 1/6 1/3 1/2 1/6

Using given tables 3.5, we define indicators 2 ∣ (t), і = 1,2, j = 1,2,3,4 absolute influences of non-material factors on production in Krasnodar territory and the Moscow area in 2015-2017. The received significances are resulted in tables 3.6, 3.7.

Using data of tables, we receive the generalised significances of an indicator productivity of non-material factors in economy of Krasyonodarsky edge and the Moscow area per 2015-2017. Results priveyodeny in table 3.8.

Table 3.6.

Indicators of absolute influence of non-material factors on proizyovodstvo in Krasnodar territory

Years Economy branches
promyshlenyo

nost

Agriculture StroitelYOstvo Transport and communication
2015 1,60 0,13 0,60 0,39
2016 1,70 0,15 0,47 0,39
2017 1.82 0,18 0,47 0,41

Table 3.7.

Indicators of absolute influence of non-material factors on proizyovodstvo in the Moscow area

Years Economy branches
promyshlenyo

nost

Agriculture StroitelYOstvo Transport and communication
2015 1,10 0,12 3,99 0,36
2015 1,19 0,16 6,15 0,55
2016 0,82 0,18 8,33 0,71

Table 3.8.

The generalised significances of an indicator productivity nemayoterialnyh factors in economy of Krasnodar territory and Moscow obla -

sti per 2015-2017

Region Years
2015 2016 2017
Krasnodar territory 1,19 1,18 1,13
The Moscow area 2,30 3,16 2,37

The analysis of data presented tables testifies about more vysoyokoj roles of non-material assets in economy of the Moscow area in sravneyonii with Krasnodar territory.

At the same time, as shows the carried out analysis it it is caused glavyonym by image essentially higher profitability building otyorasli the Moscow area. As to other branches Moscow obyolast not only has no advantages in front of Krasnodar territory, but also otyostaet in industry sphere.

<< | >>
A source: NAZAROV Alexey Jurevich. INCREASE of PRODUCTIVITY of NON-MATERIAL FACTORS of DEVELOPMENT of REGIONAL ECONOMY. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Econ.Sci. Kursk - 2019. 2019

More on topic 3.4. A quantitative estimation of the Moscow area and Krasnodar territory on productivity of non-material factors of development of economy:

  1. the Comparative estimation of productivity nematerialyonyh factors of development of the Moscow area and Krasnodar territory
  2. the Basic directions of strategy and development programs ekonoyomik the Moscow area and Krasnodar territory with allowance for influences neyomaterialnyh factors
  3. 3.1 Problems of use of non-material factors in development reyogionalnyh economy (on an example of the Moscow area and Krasnodaryosky edge)
  4. the State of the art and features of economic development reyogionov (on an example of the Moscow area and Krasnodar territory)
  5. 3.2 Directions of increase of productivity nemateriyoalnyh factors of development of regional economy
  6. NAZAROV Alexey Jurevich. INCREASE of PRODUCTIVITY of NON-MATERIAL FACTORS of DEVELOPMENT of REGIONAL ECONOMY. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Econ.Sci. Kursk - 2019, 2019
  7. the Technique of a comparative estimation of regions by efficiency isyopolzovanija non-material factors for economy development
  8. Influence of non-material factors on development potential regioyonalnoj economy
  9. Essence and a role of non-material factors in development regionalyonoj economy
  10. 1.4.1. A base technique of an estimation of productivity nemateyorialnyh factors