<<
>>

1.1. The Subject domain corresponding to a phenomenon of integrated subjects, and its contents

In the modern economic literature arise and conceptual forms in which the variety of subject ­ aspects of process of integration is reflected ­ in various levels of the organisation ­ of socially-economic relations find wide application­­: « Corporate subjects of economic policy "," the holdings dominating in the market "," participants of the Custom union "," participants of distribution of the insider rent », etc.

In itself, such phenomenon is absolutely natural - objective process of integration of economic relations searches and finds the subject images; to a ruler objective kategorialnyh forms in an economic theory there corresponds ­ a ruler subject kategorialnyh forms.

accumulation of the indicated forms over a certain measure leads ­ to statement of a problem of activization of scientific search in a direction of working out ­ of corresponding generalising concept. Thus it is necessary to be guided by ­ U.Okkama's known principle - the science does not require the redundant categories which have been not claimed by process èññëåäîâàíèÿ1.

With allowance for the indicated principle we will establish the factors determining requirement for working out of concept of integrated subjects of economic relations at the present stage of development of a science:

1 See: Nureev. Pre-capitalistic methods of production. The basic laws of development. M: the Moscow State University, 1991. S.123-169.

2 See: Torchinova O.V.Spetsificheskie of the characteristic of the integrated subjects of economic relations of modern Russia//the Sustainable development of mountain territories. 2013. ¹ 2. Ñ.88

3 see: Bekker G. S. Human behaviour: the economic approach//the Selected works on ­ an economic theory: the Lane with English / Sost. R.I.Kapeljushnikov. M: GU VSHE, 2003. S.156-347.


- intensive development of subject forms of economic relations, that, in turn, stipulates evolution of the system approach to their research,­ creating favorable conditions for kategorialnogo synthesis, promoting ­ formation of conceptual submissions about system subjects ­ of socially-economic process; Informative possibilities of the theory of personification are thus demanded;

- transformation of the human capital as result of capitalisation of creative abilities in key asset of affirming economy ­ of knowledge;

- stable reproduction of results of integration of the indicated ­ subject forms and movement of their contradictions that confirms the indicated results ­ as stable products of evolutionary process;

- impossibility to display results of integration of subject forms ­ of economic relations, using earlier generated concepts and ­ conceptual submissions of system of economic knowledge as the indicated results have other level ðàçâèòèÿ2 and do not describe adequately qualitatively ­ new ÿâëåíèÿ3.

Generalization of the resulted positions allows to formulate a conclusion that in economic practice and an economic science there is a sharp acceleration of development klastera processes in which the human factor participates. It is represented, that as a decisive link the eminence of the subject beginning in economic processes thanks to what in a modern economic science there is a set special - subject kategorialnyh ­ forms here acts­.

we will open significance indicated kategorialnyh forms for an economic theory as sciences.

First of all, we will notice, that it is necessary to differentiate accurately ­ concepts "subject" and "subjective", the side between which ­ is thin enough, but its ignoring can lead to essential conceptual ­ errors.

concept "subject" if to consider it in a context of political-economical research, reflects the following objectively caused ­ characteristics of developing system of economic relations:

- the active, active, creative beginning of the given system;

- its filling by the active subjects realising the requirements ­ and interests;

- possession in self-development system in sufficient potential, its ­ ability to do without initiating "pushes" from the outside;

- ability of system to declare and defend the interests to participate in formation and realisation of the economic policy.

we will notice, that in the given context the concept "subject" is among especially significant, defining system characteristics. To lose subject definiteness, means to make transition in other quality ­ of the organisation of an economic matter - the live and organised set ­ of economic relations passes in dead, fallen asleep for all other subjects of relations, especially objective formation which problem is reduced to maintenance ­ with the natural and human resources of the strangers extraneous to given formation vosproizvodstvennyh of processes. Let's add to it, that from the moment of loss of subject definiteness possibility of the organisation and management of the vosproizvodstvennymi is lost by processes.

the concept "subjective" kategorialno reflects and fixes ­ essentially other characteristic of developing system of economic ­ relations - potential individual, sometimes rather far from a reality, perception in consciousness of any lines of this objective reality, that is ­ potential of individual reflexion of an economic life. Unlike ­ concept "subject" "subjective" of concept it is revealed and kategorialno ­ the individual reflexion of any separate person or group of private persons is embodied. "Subjective" can be a step on a way to high-grade "subject" as the individual reflexion is supposed at formation of potential of self-development both the separate person, and all system of economic relations. In the classical literature it is marked: « People are manufacturers of the submissions »1. In a normal ­ economic situation products of public consciousness represent correct displays of a real economic life. However it is lawful to assume, that under a certain condition (the deformed method of perception ­ of an objective reality individual consciousness)"subjective"and does not grow to level"subject", remaining only a private reflexion­.

1 see: Marx K.Nemetskaja ideology//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.3. S.24-25.

we Will raise the question about what nature of those diverse subjects which act at various levels of the organisation of economic ­ relations, that is, a question on a method of interrelation of categories« the subject "and" the relation ­». It is as a first approximation obvious, that those or other subjects acting ­ in a real economic life, there is not that other as special subject forms in which are shown objectively existing economic ­ relations, and it is a question of such forms of display of the given relations ­ which are inseparable from the live person of participants of an economic life. If in one case the economic relation is shown through object (natural resources, an infrastructure, the created products) that in other case we deal with their display through separate people and their groups. In it specificity of subject forms consists, in our opinion.

it is necessary to notice, that else one and a half centuries ago in structure ­ of an economic science there was a theory focused on research ­ of subject forms of economic relations. It is a question of theory of personification and a corresponding method of research which have allowed to fill "Capital" ­ To. Marx not only objective, but also subject forms of economic ­ relations, observing thus a certain balance between the indicated forms­. We will result corresponding explanations, arguments and we will open basic elements of the theory and a method of personification of economic relations, leaning ­ on a number of the works which authors have paid to the given elements necessary attention still in Soviet ïåðèîä1.

we Will notice, that already in circulation to the readers, anticipating the analysis ­ of system of economic relations modern to it companies, K.Marx has counted ­ necessary to use the following clause concerning characters of "Capital": persons are included in process of economic research and considered in that measure in what they personify certain ­ categories, act, as figurants of economic relations and èíòåðåñîâ2. ­ We will allocate here two moments, having special significance for understanding of a phenomenon of personification:

See: Shehovtsov A.V. The theory of fetishism of commodities of Charles Marx. Voronezh: Central Black Earth book publishing house, 1965; Ermolenko A.A.Assotsiirovannye manufacturers: work as ­ amateur performance. Voronezh: VGU, 1987; Lazovsky V.F.Personifikatsija of relations of production ­/ avtoref. dis.... dokt. The house-keeper. Sciences. L. 1991. L, 1991, etc. 2Ñì.: Marx K.Kapital. T. 1//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 - e izd. Ò.23. Ñ.10.

- first, any characters meeting on pages of "Capital", are independent only so far as as they personify concrete economic relations, that is, are subordinated to the objective logic of movement of the given relations;

- secondly, embodying developing economic relations in the person, economic characters constantly are in movement, that is realise concrete functions, develop in those limits which ­ are established by the objective relations embodied in them.

we Will focus attention to trajectories of movement ­ of economic characters interesting us­:

- the starting point of the given movement is made by the elementary economic ­ characters who reflect and embody in the person such ­ relation, as potrebitelnaja goods cost;

- further there is a natural complication, both the most objective ­ relation, and characters embodying it - owing to that ­ potrebitelnye costs form in system of a commodity exchange economy for the purpose of ­ an exchange for others potrebitelnye costs results of the given system ­ of an economy enter more difficult, exchange relations, that is are equated ­ to each other, accordingly, enter exchange relations and ­ those who creates indicated potrebitelnye costs are equated to each other; so subjects of commodity transactions become exchange value embodiments;

- on a following step there is one more complication - the personification space includes new characteristics - work, a labour, cost. Recognising that at the heart of market equivalence of the goods equality ­ of the work enclosed in them lays,­ we come to conclusion that equality of the subjects making and selling the goods, is similarly based ­ on equality of those forces which are embodied in the given subjects - acting,­ realised forces of work - labours;

- reducing together resulted above position, we receive a conclusion that formal equating of one kind of labour with other kind of labour at fulfilment of the market bargain of an exchange reduces both kinds to that general beginning which contains in all kinds of labour - to the general for them to character ­ of a human labour, to an expense of a quantity of physical and intellectual forces which are concentrated in an acting labour;

- our acting labours as economic figures, ­ it is enough odnostoronni, are independent from each other, like atoms which are not connected in molecules, that is, are separated; accordingly, relations between them are made not directly, as relations of two carriers of personal forces, and oposredstvovanno - through an exchange made or before ­ the commodity products acquired ­ by them;

- then a legitimate conclusion that subject-objective interrelations, simple for subjects of relations who are made without the material intermediary, in a commodity exchange economy are delivered upside down, organised as the relation of things, instead of relations of people;

- the indicated circumstance means, that the material products ­ created by people, find properties of subjects, and those who created these products, actually become objects, getting in dependence on movement ­ own òîâàðîâ1.

We have tracked only a few steps in difficult and mnogoetapnom ­ process of personification of economic relations which covers ­ some hundreds transformations of one, more abstract economic figure in other, more difficult and concrete figure. As an original result of the analysis given mnogoetapnogo the process which has been carried out in "Capital", the conclusion that specific characteristics of figurants of economic process are results of a subject embodiment of those objective economic ­ relations which the given figurants enter in æèçíè2 acts­.

1Ñì.: Marx K.Kapital. T. 1//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.23. S.24-25, 35, 95. 2 See: Marx K.Kapital. T. 1//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.23. Ñ.95.

we Will allocate in the resulted statement a sheaf of concepts «a mask of the person». In the "Capital" context «the mask of the person» means result of transformation of all system of the person (functions, a method of the structural organisation, structure elements) the one who personifies in itself the concrete, objectively existing ­ economic relation, with reference to the nature, problems, ­ requirements, a trajectory of development of the given objective relation. The person is not simply latent by a certain mask which is easy for removing, and transformed to a mask, has grown together with it. Actually, personification is stable and socially demanded transformation of the person (person).

we Will open the contents of such transformation of the person. First, ­ each economic subject personifies not any, ­ the objective relation is any it ­ chosen, and stable, affirmed as structure of economic process; thereby works a principle of reproduction, ­ a reproduction of those relations which are claimed by company. Let's notice, that casual subject images single, non-reproducible in a public economy of objective relations, are not personified, are not fixed to concrete characters. In other words, they do not join in a turn-over of process of personification, and, hence, are not taken into consideration ­ by economic practice and an economic science.

1 see: Torchinova O.V.Sotsialnaja responsibility of the integrated subjects of modernisation ­ of economy of Russia: the monography - Vladikavkaz, State Unitary Enterprise Publishing house "Olympus", 2013. With. 9-30.

we Will generalise resulted above position and we will formulate conclusions. ­ The first of them consists in the following. The personification theory recognises that ­ participants of an economic life are reduced to economic characters, each of which corresponds to the affirmed economic relation­; Subject embodiments of non-reproducible economic relations are removed for limits èññëåäîâàíèÿ1. Each figurant of an economic life represents itself as result of transformation of the person with reference to ­ concrete conditions in which he regularly participates in economic relations. Thus there are following interconnected transformations ­ of the person:

- first, the subject embodiment of the stable, fixed ­ economic relations in personal potential and individual characteristics of people takes place­;

- secondly, properties of the person will be transformed, proceeding from requirements of functioning and development of the objective economic ­ relation reflected in it­; the subject is subject to requests of the vital process for it.

we will formulate one more conclusion concerning methodological ­ potential of the investigated theory. The informative potential of the theory of personification ­ supports heuristic possibilities of the system approach:

- first, it supplies a specific branching of system ­ of economic relations, supplementing objective forms of relations subject forms of relations, as a result the system becomes richer;

- secondly, thanks to personification two are formed not only ­ resisting, but also actively interacting branches of system - objective and subject;

- thirdly, the indicated branching vital for system, as loss subject vetvAlso means, that live set ­ of economic relations turns to the stiffened structural formation; ­ accordingly, loss by any economic system of the subject ­ potential transforms it into "warehouse" of resources for maintenance of requirements of strangers vosproizvodstvennyh ïðîöåññîâ1.

1 See: Torchinova O.V.Spetsificheskie of the characteristic of the integrated subjects of economic relations of modern Russia//the Sustainable development of mountain territories. 2013. ¹ 2. With. 89.

At last, the third conclusion concerns the method of transformation ­ of the live human person in a mask of the person. We have established, that each ­ economic character represents abstraction of the person, that is, its ­ reduction and compulsory adaptation with reference to developing ­ particular covenants of inclusion in a turn-over of public economic process.

Such abstraction is objective to that measure, in what economic relation objectively embodied in the person.

in other words, personification is imposed subjects of system ­ of economic relations by development of the given relations. Any economic character it is impossible to compose, any way to generate and include ­ in vosproizvodstvennyj process, leaning against own desires. In an equal measure naturally developed economic characters it is impossible to "cancel", leaning against force of administrative character - those or other ­ characters develop, receive development, disappear, proceeding from naturally developing relations, within the limits of realisation of requests of objective ­ laws of development of system of relations.

we have opened the nature of subject forms, have established the reasons of their ­ occurrence, change or disappearance. At the same time, we were not beyond the analysis of individual subject forms. Tovarovladelets, the capitalist, the hired ­ worker - all of them privately embody some ­ objective relations in the person­; before us - a line of individual economic ­ characters. Transition from them to the integrated ­ subjects interesting us ­ is a transition to new quality of subject forms, that is transition through some «a measure threshold». Before us - set of the questions requiring the research and the permission for what corresponding ­ deepening of research is necessary­.

1 see: Marx K.Kapital. Ò.1//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.23; Lukach G. K ontologii ­ social being. prolegomeny. M: Progress, 1991; Batishchev G. S. Introduction in creativity dialectics. M: Publishing house of Russian Christian Humanitarian institute, 1997; Belokrylova O. S. The theory ­ of transitive economy. Rostov - on Don: the Phoenix, 2002; Ermolenko A.A. The integrated subject on behalf of

the First of such questions is a question on process which naturally supplies transition from individual subject forms to ­ the integrated subject forms. Movement from the particular to the general, from ­ individual to the group and system is characterised by an economic science, as movement of nationalisation (socialisation) 1. We will result necessary ­ explanations and arguments. First of all, we will open system character of personification ­ of economic relations which, in many respects, predetermines ­ formation of the integrated (system) subjects. For this purpose we will include in a turn-over of research two fundamental pair categories of political economy - the power and the property.

Any economic character reflects and fixes the property as it is a question of that relation which includes it in public economic process in «a mask of the person» and ­ which supporters define allow to participate in results of the given process. In the modern economic literature meets ­ an interesting item in the conceptual plan, ­ the property as analogue genoma that is as some genetic formula of process âîñïðîèçâîäñòâà1. Thus as arguments ­ following positions are resulted: the property supplies preservation of system ­ quality of communications between separate elements of economic process, supports function of regulating synthesis of the moments of a novation and inertia in reproduction development, and also supplies stability of system ­ of economic relations in the course of its reproduction. Let's add to told, that thanks to the property subjects have an opportunity to operate ­ movement of economic process as it supply inflow to ­ the proprietor of the production assets expended in given process, the created ­ results, that is, supply the control over production.

modern Russia (a method of development and a method of management)//the Economic bulletin of the Rostov state university. 2008. ¹4.

1 see: Dejnega V. N. Property reproduction in system of corporate relations. Rostov-on - to Don: SKNTS VSH, 2004. With. 124-201.


a little differently, but from related items evaluates a role of the property ­ in the course of personification of Century Lazovsky which are asserted, that by the person ­ who is representing itself as the subject of managing, represents special, subject realisation of the property, or, in other words, ­ subektivirovannuju, the "revived" property. If to adhere to the given ­ item the worker is the personified life of relations of the property ­ on a labour, and the capitalist - the personified life of relations of the property on êàïèòàë1.

the Property in system of economic relations co-exists with ­ power relations. How such coexistence is organised? If to accept as an analysis condition following restriction - the power is ­ especially economic phenomenon, that is to abstract from specifically political ­ and others falling outside the limits the research ­ of aspects of the power undertaken by us ­ it is lawful to formulate following positions:

- the power is some alternative of the property, it can be presented as the force resisting to the property;

- in any case the power is distributed in system of economic relations ­ and concentrated at separate group of subjects. Uniform ­ distribution of the power destroys the semantic contents of a considered category, transforming it in «an accessory of all».

1 See: Lazovsky V.F.Personifikatsija of relations of production / avtoref. dis.... dokt. ­ The house-keeper. Sciences. L. 1991. With. 17-42.

we Concretize communications between the property and the power. It is represented, that they of a double sort:

- first, the power exists, as something from the outside resisting ­ to the property, as the government which is embodied in aggregate ­ special institutes and mechanisms, solving government problems,­ including, collection of taxes, maintenance being under guardianship at ­ the state of public requirements, property protection; ­ the government decides the problems,­ alienating a certain part of the results ­ received by proprietors in the form of taxes that allows to define it as ­ property restriction;

- secondly, the power exists, as something arisen on the basis of the property ­ and supplying requirements of its realisation. The proprietor should ­ show will and authority successfully to realise the plans and to extract ­ the income from the possession fact a property complex. In the given relation the power naturally continues the property, forming controlling mechanisms ­ created commercial organisation, supplying possibility to establish ­ norm, modes, standards of management economic process, preparation ­ and realisation of contracts; in the given relation the power does not limit ­ the proprietor, and allows it to realise the interests.

we will notice, that in both cases difficult, inconsistent interaction of the power and the property which is shown in the course of ­ nationalisation takes place­. We will open some essential moments of such interaction,­ analyzing process of submission of work to the capital.

following logic of research of a capitalist method of production, we will differentiate and we will evaluate formal and real submission of work to the capital. Formal submission of wage labour of the power of the proprietor of production assets ­ arises simply enough - on the basis of a market purchase and sale transaction at which the proprietor of production assets purchases a labour,­ including its, thereby, in structure of production conditions at its disposal. However, it is a question of the unusual goods - the proprietor of production assets for productive use of the labour acquired by it ­ should instal internal norms of duration ­ of working hours and intensity of work as otherwise ­ the cumulative labour applied by it will not bring in the expected income. We will notice, that from the fact of application of cumulative work of many kooperirovannyh labours to the integrated subject - a distance of the huge size.

we focus attention that the purchase and sale transaction and regulation ­ of duration of working hours do not form any other ­ dependence of the worker on the capital, except necessity regularly to repeat transaction with the purposes of providing of access to fund of vital means. ­ Reproduction of the relation of purchase and sale of a labour supplies the inertial mechanism of submission of work to the capital, however the given mechanism can be quickly enough destroyed and the labour is not changed in a qualitative sense­. The power in this case only formally influences the property,­ not changing it is substantial; set of labours under a command of the capitalist (secondary kollektivnost work) in case of formal submission ­ of work to the capital is unstable and can break up to separate elements at any time.

Real submission of work forms qualitatively other conditions, ­ reformative a labour, supplying original «technological dependence» the proprietor of the given force from the proprietor of production assets­. In this case the capital takes all development ­ of production under the control ­ and creates the special mechanism of transformation of a labour which is connected with mechanisms of technological progress, supplies requirements of development of the capital. Thus, in the course of reproduction simple repetition and fastening of conditions of market transaction between ­ the proprietor of production assets and the proprietor of a labour, and inclusion of set of hired workers applied by the capital in process ­ of intensive development of productive forces and relations of production takes place not­­; real submission of work also consists in it êàïèòàëîì1.

1 See: Marx K.Ekonomicheskie of the manuscript 1861-63//Marx To. Engels F.Soch. 2-izd. Ò.49. Ñ.82.

2 see: Marx K.Ekonomicheskie of the manuscript 1858-59//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.46. ×.1.

Ñ.281.


That occurs to a figure of the hired worker in case of real ­ submission of work to the capital? On change leaving in the past, to degrading ­ figures of "partial workers» manufactories and cooperations qualitatively new character - the manufacturer ìàøèí2 comes. We will open the contents of the given ­ process in that measure in what it is dictated by the delivered scientific problem.

the manufacturer of cars is a key figure of a mechanical production which, representing itself as adequate material basis of the capital, ­ allows it to open all productions of possibility mortgaged in a given method­. Let's allocate here inclusion of the manufacturer of cars in process of formation ­ of material preconditions of a new economic system which in ­ the modern scientific literature is characterised as economy çíàíèé1.

1 See: Andrusenko T.B.work with the intellectual capital//Creative economy. 2007. ¹ 7,8.

with. 4-7.

2 See: Marx K.Ekonomicheskie of the manuscript 1858-59 Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.46. ×.1.

Ñ.281.


K.Marx noticed, that submission of the proprietor of a labour ­ to developing system of cars puts it in dependence on the substantiated knowledge resisting to it, that is spiritual potentialities of production of goods belonging to the capital. The basis of industrial production pushes out ­ a labour for its borders, supplying its intensive development. Here works the following mechanism - the manufacturer of cars creates the ­ work new technologies, «the substantiated science», hence, it should have certain by the general cultural and special kompetentsijami ­ for what are necessary serious formation, care of potential of health and wide access to benefits of culture. Accordingly, the labour of the given subject develops in compliance with complication of cars created by it, and secondary ­ kollektivnost becomes strong. Thereby we closely come nearer ­ to the integrated subjects of economic relations. We will allocate ­ K.Marx's conclusion that the manufacturer of cars is involved in an orbit of action of an economic law of change of work that means enrichment ­ of the functional contents of a cumulative labour, complication of a method of its ­ organisation in each cycle âîñïðîèçâîäñòâà2. The advanced industrial production which has risen on an own basis requires regular ­ change of the contents of work flow that assumes change ­ of functions realised ­ by the worker, or the dynamical development of work flow ­ leaning against sufficient potential of the person ðàáî÷åãî1. Before us - not so usual set of the people who have signed labour contracts, and the system organisation of staff having in essential potential of development, which members are connected by technological, cultural, social ­ interrelations.

thus, process of nationalisation of a labour is expressed that the manufacturer of cars finds the strong system organisation and ­ becomes a key figure of the economic process leaning against basis of a large mechanical production. But it only one of aspects of many-sided ­ process of nationalisation of the human factor.

the Human factor of capitalist production, besides ­ proprietors of a labour, is presented by proprietors of the capital, and also ­ professional operating (managers). Proprietors of the private ­ capital in the course of nationalisation become assotsiirovannymi proprietors,­ are incorporated.

the corporation in modern economy became the leading form of the commercial ­ organisation, that, in many respects, is caused by mechanisms inherent in it aktsionirovanija the capital, investment through issue of securities, ­ coordination of interests, etc. Thanks to the given form there was a negation of that method of production to which the corporation belongs, in its qualitative ­ definiteness, that is nationalisation ñîáñòâåííîñòè2. On change ­ of an individual private property the corporate property for which capital bifurcation is characteristic has come:

- on the one hand, on the capital - the property;

- on the other hand, on the capital - function.

1 See: Marx K.Kapital. Ò.1//Marx K, Engels F.Soch. 2 izd. Ò.23. Ñ.498.

2 See: Marx K.Kapital. Ò.3//Marx K, Engels F, Soch. 2 izd Ò.25. 4.I. Ñ.481.


the securities Emitted by corporation represent only formal titles of ownership on the capital, assotsiirovannyj as a part of the valid capital functioning in vosproizvodstvennom process ­ of corporation. Thanks to the indicated bifurcation, shareholders of corporation ­ are separated from reproduction process though save the control over movement ­ of the valid capital enclosed in technology, a labour, objects ­ of an infrastructure, etc. Let's notice, that bifurcation of the capital of corporation ­ does not mean, that it exists, as two various capitals - integrity, system ­ character of the corporate property is supplied with unity ­ valid and presented in securities êàïèòàëà1.

Nationalization of the corporate property means, that the corporation finds institutsionalno-economic characteristics which distinguish it from all predshestvujushchih forms of the commercial organisation:

- availability of advanced and branched out "case" of managers and the experts, management supplying requirement of the valid ­ capital (J. Gelbrejt named such case tehnostrukturoj) 2;

- the contradiction between the valid capital functioning in the course of corporate reproduction, and the capital presented as securities of corporation (fictitious capital).

Thanks to the indicated characteristics, proprietors of securities ­ of corporation appear, as the certain uniform (system) subject having ­ the mechanism of the coordination of interests of the individual participants, ­ the mechanism of acceptance of the joint decisions, protected from external effect, etc. the Availability of the branched out system of management (tehnostruktury) ­ supplies corporations differentiation of functions of the order by object of the property ­ and functions of direct sharing in an administrative office of all ­ enterprise.

1 See: Marx K.Kapital. Ò.3//Marx K, Engels F, Soch. 2 izd. Ò.25. 4.I. S.483-486.

2 See: Gelbrejt J. And the company purposes. M: Progress, 1979. Ñ.114.


Evaluating the given characteristics, we will formulate a conclusion that ­ holders of corporate securities are to a certain extent separated from process of reproduction of the valid capital of corporation, their titles of ownership ­ it is realised, mainly, on a capital market, and economic process of corporation supplies with it only dividendnye payments. The significant ­ part of shareholders does not accept sharing in general meetings, formalizing, thereby, the voices and the corresponding rights of sharing in distribution of profit and formation of the general corporate policy. it Means, what the corporate property leaves in the past how the phenomenon, loses the significance and is superseded by a corporate governance? In the modern scientific literature there is a following conceptual submission about interrelation of the property and management in advanced corporation: technocrats actually separate set of individual shareholders of corporations from statement and the decision of problems of management of development, the conclusions of contracts, formations of the major funds and revenue distribution that means formalisation of the relation of the corporate ­ property; the real power in corporation passes to technocrats »1. Actually,­ it is a question of replacement of the socialised corporate property by the socialised corporate governance.

1 sm.:Àôàíàñüåâ S.L.future company. M: Izd - in MGTU, 2000. With. 269.

It is represented, that such conclusion is incorrect - in modern financial ­ economy the co-ordinated decisions of holders of large blocks of shares ­ change the contents of an economic life. So, usual «mortgaging ­ auction» (1996) In which result large blocks of shares of key ­ corporations of Russia have passed from the state in the property of a group of persons, for many years has predetermined oligarchical character of domestic economic system and a trajectory of its development. Thus the group of oligarchs leant against functionality which have been granted by an advanced control system of holdings, that is maintained potential corporate ­ tehnostruktury.

we Will generalise resulted above position. We have revealed ­ institutsionalno-economic preconditions of formation of the integrated subjects of the economic relations, developing in the course of nationalisation ­ of subject forms of economic relations:

- first such precondition is the cumulative worker (secondary ­ kollektivnost work) as a product of nationalisation of labour activity; in the ­ developed form it appears, as the cumulative manufacturer of cars, as the creator of the modern industry;

- second such precondition is the corporate property as ­ result of nationalisation of relations of assignment and alienation of factors and ­ results of economic process within the limits of corporation, that is, not falling outside the limits capitalist production;

- third such precondition is the branched out system of management as result of nationalisation of relations of management. Having arisen in ­ corporation, such system covers further sphere of the state and ­ municipal management, gets into sphere of small and average business, ­ social sphere, supplying as professionalism and efficiency, and ­ bjurokratizatsiju all socially-economic óïðàâëåíèÿ1.

1 See: Torchinova O.V.Spetsificheskie of the characteristic of the integrated subjects of economic relations of modern Russia//the Sustainable development of mountain territories. 2013. ¹ 2. - Ñ.89.

2 see: Torchinova the Island of Century Characteristics of the integrated subjects of economic relations ­ of modern Russia//the Economic bulletin of the Rostov state university. 2009. Ò.7. ¹1. Ñ.45.


the Indicated preconditions in process of integration processes supply formation of basic types of the integrated subjects ­ economic îòíîøåíèé2; thus it is necessary to consider following circumstance - integration process covers two various branches of system of economic relations; accordingly, on each of such branches ­ the special type of the integrated subjects (fig. 1.1.1) is formed.

Global space ______ integration _______

I

Mesolevel 1

Space of integration of the multinational corporation, international a soya - call and the organisations _________

To about r on r at an ivno-branch branch

global ­ system of relations

_____ Macrolevel ______

Space of integration of national economy

the Territorial branch of global system of relations


Mesolevel 2ô

Space ­ of integration of branch,

FPG, a diversified ­ complex

------------*---------------

Mesolevel 2ò

Space ­ of integration of region, macroregion, ­ Subregion

-----------1-----------


Space ­ of integration of separate workers (groups)

­ integration Space ­ domohozjajstva ­

Drawing 1.1.1 - integration Spaces on two branches of global system

1 Drawing is made by the author on research materials

economic îòíîøåíèé1 the Estimation of spaces of integration on two branches of global system ­ of economic relations allows to establish, that ­ the institutsionalno-economic preconditions of formation of the integrated ­ subjects of economic relations revealed by us ­­ can generate two various types ­ of the integrated subjects - we name their korporativno-integrated subject ­ and the spatially-integrated subject. The indicated types are widely presented in modern economic practice, but not described in ­ an economic theory:

- the korporativno-integrated subject - it the separate enterprises, holdings, FPG represent, consortia, conglomerates, the economic unions of the various states, the international economic organisations under the aegis of the United Nations, etc.;

- the spatially-integrated subject - it is represented ­ by national economies, regional economic systems, their unions and ­ integration formations, subregional economic localisations, local ­ economy, their unions, associations domohozjajstv, etc.

Each of the integrated subjects has the system ­ potential which is not reduced to the simple sum of those potentials who was included into its structure; here it is necessary to take into consideration ability of formation inherent in integration sinergeticheskogo effect.

results of the analysis of basic types of the integrated subjects ­ of economic relations are presented to tab. 1.1.1.

Generalization of results of the analysis of the factors determining requirement ­ for working out of concept of subjects interesting us of economic ­ relations, institutsionalno-economic preconditions of their formation and ­ basic types of the integrated subjects allows to open ­ the contents of concept interesting us and to position it in the field of ­ economic research - it is a question of stable system result ­ of personification of the economic relations, personifying diverse

results of process of the integration, receiving subject, instead of objective âî­ïëîùåíèå1.

Thus, we will allocate konstituirujushchie signs of the integrated subject of economic relations:

economic îòíîøåíèé2


- an accessory to organic, "live" systems, possession ­ in necessary potential of self-development, ability to adaptation and ability ­ to produtsirovaniju the system initiatives; any integrated subject is the active participant of formation and economic policy realisation;
1 See: Torchinova O.V.Analiz of the integrated subjects of economic relations//Scientific thought of caucasus. 2006. ¹4, ÷.2. With. 4.

2 Table is made by the author on research materials


- investment own institutsionalnoj the organisation in ­ which basis ­ the integrated relations of the property lay; Let's notice, that each integrated subject creates the institutsionalnuju environment, forms a network of the contract agreements, comprehensible methods of economic behaviour ­ of the participants (partial subjects);

- availability of the centre of the economic power and corresponding mechanisms of administration in internal circle of the integrated subject that ­ supplies possibilities of efficient control with processes in the internal environment and regulations of relations in an environment;

- possession in potentials of differentiation and integration, ability, as to allocation from the structure of separate private subjects, and to ­ integration with other subjects;

- active sharing in formation and economic policy realisation ­ at its corresponding levels îðãàíèçàöèè1.

1 See: Torchinova O.V.Spetsificheskie of the characteristic of the integrated subjects of economic relations of modern Russia//the Sustainable development of mountain territories. 2013. ¹ 2. Ñ.90.

2 See: ErmolenkoA.A., Torchinova the Island of Century To research of social responsibility of subjects ­ of economic relations//Scientific thought of caucasus. 2006. ¹4, ch. 2. With. 8.

<< | >>
A source: Torchinova Oksana Vladimirovna. Social responsibility of the integrated subjects of the Russian economy. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of the Doctor of Economics. Vladikavkaz - 2015. 2015

More on topic 1.1. The Subject domain corresponding to a phenomenon of integrated subjects, and its contents:

  1. 2. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INTEGRATED SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY: PRECONDITIONS, THE CONTENTS, THE SPECIFICATION
  2. 2.3. The contents of social responsibility of the integrated subjects of the Russian economy
  3. 1. CONCEPT OF THE INTEGRATED SUBJECTS IN THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
  4. Graniiy and subject domain structure.
  5. Structure and construction of information model of a subject domain
  6. 1.1. The essence and a subject domain of operational audit
  7. 1.2. Development of the integrated subjects in the course of ­ production nationalisation ­
  8. 1.4. Specific characteristics of the integrated subjects of the Russian economy
  9. 4.2. A paradigm of the theory of social responsibility of the integrated subjects of economic relations
  10. 3.2. Obespechitelnaja and reproductive forms of social responsibility of the integrated subjects of the Russian economy
  11. §1.3. The Legal status, a subject domain of activity and the competence of the international courts of inquiry
  12. traffic as the social phenomenon and a legal regulation subject
  13. 4.3. Principles of construction of the theory of social responsibility of the integrated subjects of economic relations
  14. 1.3. Unity and variety of kinds of the integrated subjects at the present stage economic development
  15. 4. THE CONCEPTUAL BASES OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INTEGRATED SUBJECTS OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS
  16. 3.1. Ordering of the basic forms of social responsibility of the integrated subjects of the Russian economy
  17. 3. The BASIC FORMS of social responsibility of the INTEGRATED SUBJECTS of the RUSSIAN ECONOMY