<<
>>

Ritually-formal designs

To frequency typical constructive forms - ritualnoyoformalnym to designs of English dialogical interaction
(7,5 % from the general use or 941 design) concern designs (where V2 - a verb transferring value of tactile action »):

- Greetings (a combination «hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do» + V2 ») (50 % or 471 use), for example:

After nodding to Clyde rather stiffly, and adding, "How do you do" he laid a patronising hand on his _ father's shoulder and observed: "Hi, Dad. Hello, Mother" (Dreiser, 1951: 270, V.I).

- Farewells (a combination «good bye + V2») (32 % or 301 use), for example:

"That's right. Good-bye, father!" said Prince, shaking hands. "Good-bye, my son" (Dickens, 1957: 512)

- Representations (a combination «I am / my name is + V2») (18 % or 169 uses), for example:

"My name is Sheldon, David Sheldon" he said, with direct relevance, hold­ing out a thin hand. Her hand started out impulsively then checked. "My name is Lackland, Joan Lackland." The hand went out. "And let us be friends" (London, 2010: 43).

As has shown the analysis of the dialogical fragments, the given designs are used for the purpose of display of conventional attitudes between sobesedyonikami in certificates kontaktivno-reguljativnogo type representative illokuyotivnoj functions with reglamentivnym illokutivnym in potential, and as the most frequency combinations in the given designs combinations with glayogolami to shake (to shake one's hand), to kiss, to take (to take one's hand) act:

- Combination «hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do» + to shake one's hand »(19 % (89 designs) from the general use with sochetayonijami« hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do »);

- Combination «hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do» + to kiss »(15 % (71 design) from the general use with combinations« hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do »);

- Combination «hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do» + to take one's hand »(9 % (42 designs) from the general use with sochetanijayomi« hello / good evening / good morning / how do you do »);

- Combination «good bye + to shake one's hand» (32 % (96 designs) from the general use with a combination «good bye»);

- Combination «I am / my name is + to shake one's hand» (50 % (85 konyostruktsy) from the general use with combinations «I am / my name is»).

4.5.2.

<< | >>
A source: MALYSHEVA Ekaterina Valerevna. VERBALLY-TACTILE REGULJATIVY ENGLISH DIALOGUE In KOGNITIVNO-DISKURSIVNOM ASPECT. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of the Doctor of Philology. Tver - 2018. 2018

More on topic Ritually-formal designs:

  1. 3.1. Konstituenty the complex communicative frame of formal type
  2. § 1. The formal bases of is conditional-preschedule clearing of punishment
  3. 3. Constituent instruments as formal expression of organizational unity
  4. 2.2.1. The Is formal-semantic characteristic of compound terms IJA
  5. the CHAPTER III. The FORMAL VALIDITY of the ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
  6. substantial and formal features of electronic female magazine
  7. the Chapter II. Comparison of terms of a financial accounting of English and Russian of languages at is formal-semantic level
  8. regulation of a question of the formal validity by the right of Russia and foreign countries
  9. Comparison ofbrief terms IJA and PJA at is formal-semantic level
  10. Kostylyov Vladimir Mihajlovich. Problems of the system and is formal-logic analysis of the right. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of the master of laws. Ufa – 2002, 2002
  11. Designs-references
  12. 2.2. The Is formal-semantic characteristic of English compound terms. The factors stipulating identity of the internal form of terms IJA and PJA
  13. Designs of skilled girders
  14. dialogical designs
  15. Implitsitnost the semantic subject in impersonal designs
  16. the analysis and prospects of application of non-uniform designs
  17. Various approaches to modelling kauzativnyh designs