<<
>>

«Anthropotsentrichesky shift» in linguistics and a problem of the language person.

Anthropotsentrichesky shift in modern linguistics has put before researchers of language all of the new problems which decision has appeared possible only thanks to change of the point of view on object of linguistic research, to be exact - thanks to a choice of new object.

The language person, and also everything became that, that is connected with features of its functioning in language community and - is wider - in the world. The theory of the language person, structure actual for it a language picture, a national language picture, the theory of a discourse and a technique of the critical analysis of a discourse, the theory of speech certificates, lingvokontseptologija with its interest to functioning of consciousness of the language person and the psycholinguistics, trying to describe communication between consciousness and language, lingvokulturologija, describing communication of the language person and culture, lingvopersonologija - here only some aspects of the problematics generated modern antropotsentricheskoj, pragma -

Functional paradigm in linguistics.

The concept "discourse" became the central concept antropotsentricheskoj linguistics. It not a new word in culture and not a new word in a science. For the first time it has been fixed in V century of our era, and in linguistics, in particular, domestic, has entered into the use in the end of XIX century (L.P.Jakubinsky used a word-combination «diskursivnoe govorenie» and considered, that consideration of language depending on conditions govorenija should be base of linguistics [Gorbunova 2012: 244]). In a science the word "discourse" actively also is terminologically used since 1952, after the publication of known article of Z.Harrisa "Language".

As the discourse as has firmly settled in a modern science, is «the speech shipped during a life» [Arutyunov 1990: 136], and the given form of activity in the given conditions is accessible only to the person, the discourse is a habitat of functioning of the person as language person, and, hence, studying of a discourse out of consideration of problems of the language person is impossible. On the other hand, and studying of the problems connected with the language person, is possible only through a discourse-analysis prism as the language person realises itself only and exclusively in diskursivnyh experts.

The concept of the language person goes back to representations about individual character of mastery of a language which have arisen still in the end of XVIII - the beginning of XIX centuries in works V Humboldt and I.G.Gerdera's background, and have then received development in researches of scientific subsequent generations. In domestic linguistics interest to problems of the language person has been caused V.V. Vinogradova's devoted to the characteristic author's idiostilej by the works, and also the speech characteristic of characters. Subsequently problems of the language person such researchers, as G.I.Bogin, Of this year Vorkachev developed, V.I.Karasik, JU.N Sentries and many other things.

The fullest description of a phenomenon «the language person» was given, as is known, by JU.N.sentr. Its model of the language person includes three structural levels: «verbally-semantic, assuming for the native speaker normal possession of a natural language..... kognitivnyj which units are concepts, ideas, kontsepty, developing at each language individuality in ordered« a world picture »...», and also level pragmatical which contains system of motives and the purposes operating functioning and development of the language person [of Sentries 1989: 3-8].

Interaction of all these three levels forms communicative space of the person.

By the way, JU.N.sentr in quoted work directly connects a phenomenon of the language person with "discourse" made by it: «a discourse Example
The sum of statements of any character hudozhestvenyonogo products which acts in this case as model of the real language person »[in the same place] can serve.

As researchers believe, the theory of the language person receives the development on ways of that revealing as the language person realises itself in real speech practice. From here - theory formation «the speech person»: «in real speech activity the language person appears as a paradigm of speech persons, represents generalised, typified invariant parametres making it while the speech person is a person” in real dialogue ”» [Kyshtymova 2014: 240].

«Speech persons», being variants in relation to the language person as certain invariantu, are interesting and rather popular object in modern linguistics. Extremely productive tradition of that research that is called lingvokulturnyj (kommmunikativnyj) "type" which for the present moment is made by the whole series of the works which are going back to ideas of V.I.Karasika [Karasik 2004: 48-49 became a recension of such interest.], [Karasik, JArmahova 2006]. These are types of "sceptic", «the English colonial employee», "Cossack", «the American superman», "cowboy", "knight", «Hausfrau» and so on ([Pimkina 2017], [Derevjansky 2004], [Dmitriev 2004], [Karasik 2004], [Kombarova 2004], [Mishchenko 2004], [Skachko 2004], etc.).

«Lingvokulturnyj a type» as the speech person can be directly correlated with those variants of display of the author's beginning which we face in a business press: they are isomorphic each other as are a concretising combination of obshche-cultural and individual lines of the certain language person. However, unlike lingvokulturnogo a type, which not necessarily realises itself in speech (or realises itself not only in speech), the author of the media text is to the full the speech person though, as well as at lingvokulturnogo a type, its personal and personal beginning is modulated by variety of the external
The restrictions imposed by features diskursivnoj of environment in which it exists. Therefore experience tipologizatsii lingvokulturnyh types (and communicative persons) can be used and as an example in work over tipologizatsiej other variants of the language (speech) person, in our case - authors of the business media text.

The language person as whom in linguistics it is understood «... The concrete person estimated as typical, the exemplary or original carrier of given language and represented in aggregate of its speech characteristics» [the Short dictionary of linguistic terms: 148], realises the given characteristics in concrete speech genres. Does not exist vnezhanrovyh forms govorenija and letters - this idea dominates in zhanrovedcheskih researches in many respects thanks to M.M.Bakhtin's efforts. Making comments on the positions stated by the classic of domestic philology, the modern researcher writes: « Main zhanrovo-personologicheskie Bakhtin's ideas can be shown to the following: the person of the speaking shows (relative) freedom from the formal party - in a variation of the form of statements in the limits set by a genre (Bakhtin noticed, that at different genres these limits different, for example, at a military command and easy conversation); the person listening - from the substantial party: its freedom is freedom of interpretation told speaking, and too in the limits set by a genre »[Dementyev 2011: 313].

Therefore, on the one hand, characteristics of the language person are defined by its intentions, its position, author's intentsionalnostju in which its relation to the described facts, events and so on is realised, that is - an author's modality. On the other hand, the limits set by a genre, are borders in which there is a language person and which define its characteristics. Does not exist out of-genre forms govorenija and letters. But also character govorenija and letters, their linguistic characteristics are substantially predetermined by a genre and it
Conventions, it is system connected with an extralinguistic environment, differently - with actual for the author diskursivnoj a formation.

Therefore the problem of the author becomes "kernel" of a problem of the language person, and to solve the questions connected with life of the author in language and speech, adequately to investigate a problem of an author's modality it is possible only within the limits of a parity "author-text-language-culture".

1.1.1.

<< | >>
A source: GADZHIEVA Lala Abdulsalam kyzy. LANGUAGE STRATEGIES AND TACTICS OF REPRESENTATION OF AUTHOR'S MODALITY IN DISCOURSE OF BUSINESS PRINTED MEDIA (on the material of the publications Kommersant, Expert, The Economist, The Financial Times). Thesis for the degree of candidate of philological sciences. Tver - 2017. 2017

More on topic «Anthropotsentrichesky shift» in linguistics and a problem of the language person.:

  1. the author as the language person. A problem of the author in philology and linguistics.
  2. CHAPTER 1. THE CONCEPT OF THE LANGUAGE PERSON AND THE PROBLEM OF THE AUTHOR IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE THE ANALYSIS DISCOURSE -
  3. Anthropotsentrichesky kontsept (an artificial intellect unit simply as the tool of the person in creation of results of intellectual activity)
  4. 1.4. Uniformity of components of language messages and its treatment in linguistics
  5. § 1.1 Category of intensity in modern linguistics and language means of its expression
  6. 1.2.1. The language person and the professional language person
  7. the Chapter I. KOGNITIVNAJA LINGUISTICS And CONCEPTUAL RESEARCHES AT the PRESENT STAGE of DEVELOPMENT of LINGUISTICS
  8. 2.2.2. A professional language picture of the world and the professional language person of the employee of bank
  9. 2.2. The Anthropotsentrichesky direction in research terminosistem
  10. concept of communicative behaviour and the communicative person of modern linguistics
  11. 1.1. A condition of a problem of studying of children's speech in psychology and linguistics from the end of IXX century to 50th HH century
  12. concept of the language person of the preacher
  13. 1.2. Base values and a problem of language consciousness
  14. 1.1. The language person and idiostil
  15. 1.2. Idiostil and idiolekt the language person