<<
>>

Diskursivnaja a formation as system of formation of statements

Integrity represents property of the object considered in aggregate making it of elements, organised according to certain principles. If to speak about a discourse for definition of its integrity it is necessary to understand law of its formation as constantly repeating interrelation between its elements, defining stages of process of deployment of a discourse.

Considering, that the discourse «does not form the rhetorical or formal unity capable to infinite repetition» [Foucault 2004: 227], for definition

Laws we take statements between which we can establish interrelation, define rules of their formation. In that case when we can define the laws arising at formation of statements then it is a question about diskursivnoj formations as diskursivnaja the formation, on M.Fuko, is for statements «the coexistence law» [Foucault 2004: 226].

The concept diskursivnoj has not received a formation in linguistics of unequivocal understanding. This concept is frequent correlate to a discourse as private and the general, as specific and patrimonial, as a discourse version [Burtsev 2008, Revzina 2005, Chernjavsky 2006]. Thus given concept is one of the cores in the course of the analysis of a discourse and its definition demands additional specification. According to dictionary treatment of this concept, under a formation understand a certain step, a stage in development something; type, the structure the something inherent in the given step, the development stage, defined in the way of manufacture. The duality of the given concept is observed not only in sociology, but also in the discourse-analysis.

If for M.Fuko diskursivnaja the formation is important, first of all, as the environment which is carrying out strukturoobrazujushchuju function M.Peshe names diskursivnoj a formation that according to ideological positions defines «that can and should be told (in the form of solemn speech, the sermon, a lampoon, the program etc.)» [Peshe 1999 (: 265]. Abundantly clear interdependence of two ponimany

diskursivnoj formations: on the one hand, diskursivnaja the formation is considered as the environment of generation and structurization of statements, and with another - as representation of an ideological formation in speech activity.

There is a danger to mix diskursivnuju a formation and a discourse as result of realisation of this principle. To dissolve the given positions, we will try to define diskursivnuju a formation and a discourse in opposition a statics / dynamics. Diskursivnaja the formation is a generating principle, obuslovlennnyj restrictions which are imposed on speech activity of the subject. These restrictions, norms and conventions are staticized in already generated texts (discourse) which, in turn, show restrictions for the subsequent phases of a discourse (discourses): creative, retseptivnoj and referential.

Therefore we consider, that diskursivnaja the formation is static and rigidna, as any restrictions. The discourse defined by it, - is dynamical: it is the process which result is the text representing material fixing of a statics diskursivnoj of a formation which can be mobilised for manufacture of a new discourse and, as consequence, generation of new texts. Structure diskursivnoj formations set of texts, and rules sets not, norms, conventions which are represented by mechanisms «that Burtsev 2008: 15] can be told» [. Thus, diskursivnaja the formation forms system of conditions of manufacture of statements in the circumstances defined diskursivnoj by practice.

The concept diskursivnaja practice has been entered by M.Fuko for a set designation «anonymous, historical, always determined in time and space of rules which during the given epoch and for the given social, economic, geographical or linguistic sector, defined conditions of realisation of function of the statement» [Foucault 2004: 227 - 228]. Postulated communication diskursivnyh an expert with socially significant spheres allows us to consider diskursivnye experts PR as speech activity in sphere Public Relations.

Set diskursivnyh the expert, formed and realised within the limits of corporation as diskursivnoj formations, also represents a PR-discourse. The understanding of a discourse offered by M.Fuko as «systems of restrictions», is to the full shown at the analysis of a PR-discourse which is formed according to corporate norms. They impose restrictions on process of manufacture of statements, selection of objects, that, concepts, and it is important to define conditions of the given process and to establish the laws understood by us as constantly repeating interrelation between statements, as the system of relations determined by a position of the subject.

For this purpose we investigate a PR-discourse within the limits of such concepts as arhitektonika a discourse, the possible world, a discourse order, diskursivnaja a tonality, positioning.

1.3.2.

<< | >>
A source: SELEZNEVA LARISA VASILEVNA. PARAMETRIC MODEL OF PR-DISCOURSE: PRAGMATICS, SEMANTICS, AXIOLOGY. DISSERTATION on competition of a scientific degree of the doctor of philological sciences. Tver - 2018. 2018

More on topic Diskursivnaja a formation as system of formation of statements:

  1. a discourse and diskursivnaja a formation as the environment of formation of the language person of the author of the media text
  2. conditions of formation of integrity of a PR-discourse: a discourse order, diskursivnaja a tonality, positioning
  3. Solodova Irina Petrovna Dissertatsija. . Perfection of planning of industrial and commercial activity of communication statements by formation of effective supplying strategy, 2007
  4. 2 working out of a technique of formation of effective supplying strategy at planning of industrial and commercial activity of communication statements (on an advertising strategy example)
  5. 1.1. Factors of formation and development of the maintenance of humanitarian subject matters of classical gymnasia formation as a condition of formation of historical consciousness of grammar-school boys
  6. §1. Stages of formation of the Spanish tax system and system of taxes of Spain
  7. «the Conceptual model and mechanisms of formation of readiness of the psychologist of formation to professional work»
  8. «the psychological analysis of professional work of the psychologist of formation as the objective basis of formation of readiness»
  9. «the Teoretiko-methodological substantiation akmeologicheskoj concepts of formation and development of subjects polyethnic formation»
  10. «working out and introduction akmeologicheskoj concepts of formation and development of polyethnic competence of subjects of formation within the limits of new akmeologicheskogo directions – etnoakmeologii formations»
  11. «Empirical research of formation and development of polyethnic competence of subjects of formation»
  12. «Psihologo-pedagogical technologies of formation of readiness of the psychologist of formation to activity and an estimation of their efficiency»
  13. 2.3. Loan as the major source of formation of Russian youth slenga and methods of its formation
  14. Formation and constitutional law development on formation In history of Russia
  15. factors of formation and development of conceptual bases soyoderzhanija gymnasia formation in Russia of second half XIX - the XX-th century beginnings