<<
>>

Introduction

Now in a modern society the science about effective dialogue which is called as the theory of speech influence [Sternin 1990] actively develops.

In most cases as speech influence - in wide smysyole - understand the speech dialogue taken in aspect of its purposefulness, motivational conditionality.

After all in any certificate of speech dialogue komyomunikanty pursue the certain nonverbal aims which finally regulate activity of the interlocutor [Issers 2008]. Numerous linguistic researches [Denisjuk 2003; Ivanov 2003; Ostroushko 2003; ZHeltuhina 2004; Rubanova 2006; Degtyaryov 2008; Komisarova 2008; SHelestjuk 2009; Gorjachev 2010; Maltsev 2011; Bubnova 2012, etc.] pokazyyovajut, that efficiency of speech influence is reached for the account ispolzoyovanija various expressional means of language, argument level, aktsenyotirovanija the most significant elements of the statement. After all for povysheyonija statement influences on the interlocutor speaking osoznanno or neyoosoznanno uses intensifying means of language where the term "usiyolenie" as a synonym of the term "intensification" is understood as expression of high degree of quality, intensity of action or condition or siyostema raznourovnevyh the means serving to expression of strengthening. Therefore in the present research speech influence is considered from positions of a category of intensity, the way of expression and which force depend on the person of the most speaking, its individual preferences, speech temperament, communicative conditions, emotions.

The problematics of intensity and emotions was studied by representatives different jazykovedcheskih directions (see [Vorobeva 1958; Balli 1961; SerYOgeeva 1967; Gerasimov 1970; Ubin 1974; Semejko 1975; CHervenkova 1975; Suvorina 1976; Sushchinsky 1977; Fetiskina 1977; Mamanova 1978; to the Glade
sky 1978; Sadovsky 1978; Rsaldinov 1980; SHejgal 1981; Musienko 1984; Kotnjuk 1986; Telija 1986; Akulenko 1987; Kozlova 1987; Turansky 1987, 1990; Shahovsky 1987; Tsoy 1989; Yerofeev 1996; Gridneva 1997; Karpovsky 1998; Kolesnikov 1999; Kutejsh 1999; Leksina 2000; Myagkov 2000; Velyosky 2001; Troshkina 2001; Safonova 2002; Revenko 2004; Savicheva 2004; RoYOdionova 2005; Leonteva 2006; Borodkin 2007; Ilinsky 2007; Radchenko 2007; Shilovsky 2007, etc.]). Apparently, the leading part in research of linguistic aspects of emotions belongs to V.I.Shahovskomu according to whom, the person expresses in the course of semantic interpretation of the world the emotional relation to its separate objects, their qualities, properties [Shahovsky 1987].

According to V.I.Shahovskomu, at language level of emotion transformiyorujutsja in emotivnost; emotion - a psychological category, and emotiv - nost - language as emotions can both be caused and is transferred (vyyorazhatsja, to be shown) in language and language. For kommunikativnoyoorientirovannoj linguistics one of the most difficult for today of places is the problem of effective language communications. Within the limits of this problem causes the big theoretical and practical interest studying of those factors which have been put in pawn in a word which cause emotionally-effective communications [Shahovsky 1987].

There is a number of works in which private aspects of a category of intensity are considered. Lexical means of expression of intensity in sphere verbal and adektivnoj lexicon, frazeologicheyoskie, syntactic and word-formation means of expression intenyosivnosti, including by means of indicators of ways verbal dejyostvija are analyzed.

Attempts to track interaction intensivnoyosti with other components of a lexical word meaning are undertaken. Exist takyozhe intensity researches on a material of dialect lexicon [Titov 1964, CHervenkova 1975, Fetiskina 1977, Mamanova 1978, Ermakova 1982, Mu -
sienko 1984, Akulenko 1987, Half-Jansky 1987, Tsoy 1989, Gavrilova 1993, Yerofeev 1996, Gridneva 1997, Belsky 2001, Safonova 2002].

Intensity of speech influence is in many respects defined by type of speech dialogue. In sociopolitical debate (further - SPD), for example, necessity correct from the point of view of their participants dejyostvy and-or estimations is inspired to addressees - to citizens of community [Shapoch - kin 2012: 58]. Therefore at choice SPD as a material of the present research that fact has been taken into consideration, that characteristic osobenyonostju the component which helps their participants to open the essence by means of speech strayotegy, used to convince the addressee of the correctness is their convincing (rechevozdejstvujushchaja).

The analysis of a modern condition of a problem shows, that in sovreyomennoj to domestic linguistics there are monographic researches kateyogorii no intensity and means of its expression in speech of politicians, uchastvujuyoshchih in SPD. It defines an urgency of the present research.

Object of research are intensified vyskazyvayonija politicians - participants SPD.

Object of research are expression means intensivnoyosti in Russian-speaking and English-speaking SPD.

The purpose of the present work is revealing and the characteristic jazykoyovyh means of expression of intensity in SPD.

Achievement of the given purpose assumes the decision of following problems:

1) to consider parametres of a category of intensity;

2) to give characteristics of a speech genre sociopolitical debayoty;

3) to prove a technique of the analysis of a category of intensity in sotsialnoyopoliticheskih debate;

4) to analyse statements of participants of debate on purpose vyjavyolenija argumentativnyh, lexical and grammatical features osuyoshchestvlenija speech influence in aspect of a category of intensity.

Research material have served transkripty SPD candidates on a post of the mayor of Moscow in Russian and leaders of opposition parties of the Great Britain in English as total amount about 3000 pages. From the seen material have been allocated and analysed mikroyoteksty, possessing intensity signs.

In the dissertation methods of the qualitative, quantitative analysis, a descriptive method (comparison and differentiation receptions isyosleduemogo a material), techniques strategic and argumentativnogo anayoliza are used.

As theoretical basis researches have served in area:

• intensity categories (I.I.Turansky, I.I.Sushchinsky, S.Balli, E.I.Shejgal, L.JA.Gerasimov, O.A.Borodkin, I.J.Kutejsh, S.E.RoYodionova, etc.);

• speech genres (T.V.Anisimov, M.M.Bakhtin, V.V. Dementyev, V.I.Karasik, K.F.Sedov, T.V.Shmelev, etc.);

• speech strategy and tactics (N.D.Arutyunov, A.N.ram, L.G.VasiYolev, L.I.Grishaeva, O.S.Issers, T. A van Dejk, C.Larson, etc.);

• arguments (A.N.ram, L.G.Vasilev, A.A.wol, Etc. TretjaYOkova, N.J.Fanjan, F van Eemeren, R.Grootendorst, D.Eninger, S.Tulmin, etc.).

Scientific novelty of the dissertation consists that for the first time intenyosifitsirujushchie statements as means of speech influence klassifiyotsirujutsja on strategy, tactics and argumentativnomu to filling in situayotsijah their uses in SPD.

The theoretical importance of work consists that given isyosledovanie brings the contribution to development of the linguistic theory of intensity
(Its signs for concrete type of a discourse), theories mezhyolichnostnogo dialogue (characteristics of speech genre SPD are specified), teoyorii speech influence and the linguistic theory of the argument (opredeyoleny parametres of the description of intensity in a substantiation of the decision of controversial problems) are characterised.

Practical value of the dissertation is connected with possibility primeyonenija the results received in work, in high school courses on stylistics, zhanrologii, kognitivnoj to linguistics and the theory of intensity and speech influence.

The positions which are taken out on protection:

1. Rechevozdejstvie in SPD it is carried out by means of the general kommuyonikativno-strategic and special argumentativnyh means. These means can contain intensifying components - intensifika - you (intensifying adjectives and verbs), intensifikatory (adverbs-intensivy), degrees of comparison of adjectives, emfaticheskie usiyoliteli (do) and vidovremennye verb forms. In Russian-speaking debate isyopolzujutsja basically lexical means of expression of intensity, mainly, intensifying adjectives, in English-speaking debate - morphological means, mainly, vidovremennye forms.

2. From the point of view of the strategic approach to dialogue, participants of soyotsialno-political debate use strategy of discredit and sa - moprezentatsii, but use the majority of means of expression intensivnoyosti in discredit strategy, thereby achieving an ultimate goal - zavoe - vat/keep the power - basically at the expense of creation of negative image of contenders.

3. From the point of view of argumentativno-functional filling debayotov, means of expression of intensity are used basically in direct Arguments that increases argumentativnuju force of a substantiation of the Thesis. InYO
tensifikatsija the Terminator increases intensity of the Thesis, that usiliyovaet rechevozdejstvie arguments. The Reservation intensification, on the contrary, reduces persuasiveness of the argument.

4. In tectonics of argument of means of expression of intensity predyostavleny in linked and not linked (konvergentnyh) structures. Thus participants of English-speaking debate use more linked ar - gumentativnyh structures, than participants of Russian-speaking debate.

Work approbation. Substantive provisions and results of research have been stated in reports on International scientifically-practical konfeyorentsii «the Language discourse in social practice» (Tver, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017), at the All-Russia scientifically-practical conference «the Theory and istoyorija the German and Romance languages in the modern higher school of Russia» (Kaluga, 2013, 2015), at Regional scientifically-practical conference on the basis of KGU of K.E.Tsiolkovsky (Kaluga, 2010-2016).

By results of research 18 articles, 3 of which - in the reviewed scientific editions recommended VAK the Russian Federation are published.

Volume and work structure. The dissertation total amount makes 246 pages. Work consists of the introduction, two heads, the conclusion, bibliograficheyoskogo the list, the list of conditional reductions, the list of sources of examples and the appendix.

<< | >>
A source: KULABUHOV NIKITA VLADIMIROVICH. INTENSITY of SPEECH INFLUENCE In SOCIOPOLITICAL DEBATE. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Phil.Sci. Kaluga - 2018. 2018

More on topic Introduction:

  1. in introduction
  2. INTRODUCTION
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. 10.1. Introduction
  5. INTRODUCTION
  6. approbation and introduction of results.
  7. Introduction
  8. Introduction
  9. INTRODUCTION
  10. INTRODUCTION
  11. Introduction
  12. Introduction
  13. INTRODUCTION