1.3. Research of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge in frameworks inferentsionnogo the approach

Studying of influence of the psychological factor on ability of the individual to involve the experience found earlier has made actual research proyotsessa understanding in natural conditions of knowledge and dialogue.

The reality implitsitnoj support on VZ at word meaning identification / the text priyoznayotsja de facto, however nereshyonnost problems of the theoretical description mehayonizmov formation and processes of involvement of such support does not allow to give a system substantiation of how the people acting active pereyozhivajushchimi as "witnesses" of an event, are capable to reach understanding during communications.

One of the approaches, covering a wide range of interdisciplinary researches on the given problem, is inferentsionnyj. Inferentsionnaja a support on generated in former experience of the individual a conclusion parcel trakyotuetsja as an explanation of a course and a result of the decision of a problem, ability «to connect upoyotrebljaemye verbal signs with those various subjects and javlenijayomi, properties and relations which make value of these signs» [Vojshvillo, Degtyaryov 2001: 455]. Inferentsionnyj the approach leans on poyostulat about generality and necessity of causally-semantic communication as in the world, physical and social, objectively there are no separately proceeding phenomena. Causality of understanding is caused by examples / obyoraztsami the experience, different in degree obobshchyonnosti, automatism of activation and which intuitive credibility sets realisation prichinnoyosledstvennyh relations in natural conditions of knowledge and dialogue.

As a whole "inferentsija" (from English inference) it is widely used in nauchyonyh researches and in the general view process formirovayonija opinions or judgements about something is treated as «; judgement about sense of any action acquired during similar process» [LDCE 1992: 536]; «a conclusion, zakljucheyonie; meant, the assumption» [Muller 1992: 336].

In a number of science areas imenovanie "inferentsija" it is used as obyoshchy the term reflecting dynamism, productivity informative dejayotelnosti and sootnosimyj with procedure of formation of conclusion, for example, natural deduction (the theory of mental models [Johnson - Laird 1999; Johnson-Laird et al. 2012]), an induction (the theory pertseptivno obuyoslovlennogo knowledge [Barsalou 2008]), abduktsiej (the theory nejrodinamiche - skogo modelling [Thagard 2010] etc.). In works on creation iskusyostvennogo intelligence such conclusion is recognised by causal, implitsirujushchim model «the reason - the result» and is considered as an establishment prichinyonoj communications as a part of a causal network [Wang 2011: 50-51]. Caused poyodobnoj communication the result has no literal similarity to the reason, as javljayoetsja «result of a long chain of causality where extreme links cannot be identical» [Gubanov 1986: 41].

In kognitivnoj and social psychology the term "inferentsija" svjazyvayoetsja with a phenomenon causal atributsii, i.e. attributing possible poyovedencheskih reactions, characteristics, intentsy to object / to the subject with the account of the external reasons (specificity of objects / situations of the real world) and vnutrenyonih the reasons (opinions of the interpreter with a support on system of social norms and estimations).

During such attributing the individual explains an event not only «for others», but also «for itself» with a support on defined kontseptualyonoe the maintenance which is formed in the course of experience finding vzaimoyodejstvija with the world. The internal reasons-parcels are presented implitsitno, remaining knowledge «for itself», but can eksplitsirovatsja and verbally be transferred, for example, by verbs of mental action. So, in the answer on voyopros Why it has gone to the Italian cafe? The information about kognitivnoj akyo
tivnosti the person eksplitsiruetsja (she knew, that there cook present kayopuchino) or it is deduced by the recipient (it has gone there to drink present kayopuchino) with a support on causal "history" of reflexions (cause history of rea­sons), which result - the latent preknowledge of behaviour motive forces cheloyoveka (folk concept of mind and behaviour) [Malle 2011: 85].

Subjectively formed products of informative activity inyodivida are mediated by a duality of systems of thinking and distinction urovyonej intellectual processing (independent, algorithmic, reflekyosivnogo [Stanovich 2012 349-352]). Similar ambiguity sets a support on implitsitnuju the information involved intuitively / after careful consideration, proceeding from system of opinions, belief, emotions of the individual in process evristiyocheskogo search or a hypothetical reasoning [Mercier, Sperber 2009: 149­150; Evans 2008: 263-264; Goel 2005]. Success of such intellectual efforts contacts features of the person of the individual and sotsiokulturnoj environments [Sternberg 2005: 187].

This process acts as a plausible explanation of a course of the decision neyokoj the problems which principal views are considered as heuristic search (intuitive judgement) or realised hypothetical razmyshleyonie (about evristikah as one of types kognitivnyh biases see: [Haselton et al. 2009: 733]). The judgement which proyoistekaet from an initial hypothesis without its considerable change, for example, the stranger is perceived as threat admits intuitive: a stranger as menacing en­tails a prediction of future harm [Kahneman, Frederick 2005: 267. Italics of the author]. Researches in nejropsihologii speak about kategorialnyh (experience naturally arising kontseptualizatsii) and pertseptivnyh (about acoustical, visual [Barsalou 2008: 624-625]) inferentsijah, leaning on sensual pereyozhivanija former interactions with object (including a word) and pozvoyoljajushchih to fall outside the limits pertseptivnoj the information.

Specificity of verbal representation of the results received in the course of a support on the deduced information, does not remain without attention of linguists.
Working out of logiko-semantic and pragmatical approaches has made vozyomozhnoj to correlate support process on VZ with logic types of a conclusion, proyoblemoj the validity / lozhnosti, structure of value of unit of language. vydeyoljajutsja is formal-logic inferentsii: a logic consequence, semantiyocheskaja presuppozitsija, conventional implikatura. They neustranimy / nepodavljaemy a context [Makarov 2003: 124-126], potentsialny, i.e. soyostavljajut literal sense of the statement [Paducheva 2004: 101, 109].

In turn, the likelihood conclusion / is likelihood-inductive in - ferentsija [Makarov 2003: 126] nekonventsionalna, has properties vyvodimoyosti, vychislimosti, credibility [Paducheva 2004: 110], not eksplitsiruetsja, acts as means "dodumyvanija" [Makarov 2003: 124], is caused transyoformatsijami a context [Levinson 2000], rational strategy of the decision of a problem [Leech 1983: 30-31] or understanding strategy [Keene, Zimmermann 2007: 23] can be considered as neforyomalnaja. Results of a support on vyyovodimuju the information have private character, arise situationally and are not stable semantic components. From here inferentsija from positions pragmatists - «the standard association which does not contain directly in a word meaning, but is connected with it in consciousness language kollektiyova», it concerns to deduced ("cheaper") to value components [Paducheva 2004: 107, 110].

Pragmatists concern doubtless achievements a recognition of importance of not language factors at formation implitsitnogo maintenances, napriyomer, presence ostensivnogo stimulus (the relevance theory [Wilson, Sperber 2004]), subjectivity of deducing of the latent information, conditionality language and encyclopaedic knowledge, and also refusal from formalnoyologicheskoj treatments of the validity / lozhnosti. The credibility assumption vyyovodimyh data provides semantic communication of elements of a discourse, or «inferentsii a discourse» (conversational inference [Green 1996: 89-131]), kotoyorye, like "bridges" (bridging inferences), connect relevant ad hoc
Senses, implitsiruemye various signs, verbal and ikonicheskimi (implikatami), for example, in the advertising text [Prokhorov 2006: 8].

Such "bridges" are formed together with text perusal (neposredyostvennye / on-line inferentsii) or, providing connectivity perceived, arise after perusal of any fragment (mediated / off-line inferentsii), being a part of the general mental model of understanding [Mar­molejo-Ramos 2009: 83-85]. Deducing process implitsitnoj support ponimayonija words / the text is studied within the limits of the theory of mental models of F.DzhonYosona-Lerda (two-level mental model of understanding and modular moyodel semantic and pragmatical components of value in the theory uslovyonyh statements), situational models T van Dejka and V.Kincha (tryohyourovnevaja situational model of complex processing of the information), in V.Kincha's konyostruktivno-integration theory, the theory referentsii where proyotsess formations of a similar support it is presented in the form of a causal chain (S.Kripke's causal theory), a causal network (M.Devitta, K.Sterelni's deskriptivno-causal theory etc.) «The mental file» (the neocausal theory referentsii A.D.Shmelev) etc.

Revealing of the latent senses sets necessity of allocation mentalyonyh schemes which with experience are formed in consciousness of the native speaker [BaraYOnov 2007: 452-453], retseptivnyh the schemes providing interaction koyognitivnogo and language experience of members of society. Such schemes assume, that transferred eksplitsitno the information «is considered language soznayoniem as equivalent other information which in the given concrete case is not expressed verbally, eksplitsitno» [Sternin 2014: 130-131]. SoYOderzhatelnoe a variety of internal parcels predetermines set of the bases of their formation: «various aspects of external and internal contexts, knowledge sotsiokulturnogo character, kognitivnye the structures of all levels displaying experience of activity in similar situations, eleyomenty pertseptsii, norms, principles, rules of language dialogue and vzaimoyodejstvija in various groups» [Makarov 2003: 126].

On the basis of stated above, the basic characteristics and typology inferentsy from positions of various interdisciplinary researches it can be defined, proceeding from an originality of aspects of "vision" of this phenomenon: as the process caused by universality of procedures of deducing of the latent information, as product of various experience of realisation rechemysliyotelnoj activity by the individual / the society, generated thanking psychophysical features of the person of the subject / to specificity of socially divided rules, estimations, knowledge (the knowledge is understood «organizovanyonaja as the information;... A part of system or a network structured informayotsii» which «can be presented in consciousness set of the various ways including the relations, lexical reprezentatsii, images and neurologic components» [Solso 2002: 297-299]).

As a whole results of interdisciplinary scientific workings out in frameworks inferentsionnogo the approach allow to formulate a number of positions:

1) abduktivnaja the conclusion scheme where parcels are presented with the account proyoduktov findings by the individual of various experience, appears important protseyodurnoj as a support of reception of conclusion (D.Gudinga, P.Tagarda's work, etc.). Representations about deductive model have undergone changes, I priznayovat possibility of natural deduction (F.Johnson-Lerd, etc.);

2) parcels including kategorialnye, structurally also are substantially caused by experience of the individual and are qualified as suppozitsija (F.Johnson-Lerd), a simulator and simulation (L.Barsalou), reprezentatsii razyolichnoj the nature and structure (R.Zvaan, K.Holiouk, J. Hamel and others), ostensivnyj a symbol (D.Sperber, D.Wilson, R.Karston) etc.;

3) dynamic character of process of understanding allows to model a course of conclusion with a support on a deduced relevant product of experience poyosredstvom mental models (F.Johnson-Lerd and others), situational models (situational model of complex processing of information T van Dejka and V.Kincha, V.Kincha's is constructive-integration model) etc.;

4) the explanation of process of understanding in natural conditions of knowledge and dialogue is impossible without the account of a principle of relevance (not for typicalness!) poyosylok. Under the influence of some stimulus (verbal / nonverbal) the subject searches for an optimum, shortest and most convenient way objasneyonija «for me - here - now» which is caused both language, and encyclopaedic knowledge of the subject of understanding, its psychophysical features. Once having defined such way, he creates a case product own (more often positive) the experience including and soderyozhatelnye, and the procedural bases. Such product acts as a steady support in the course of understanding, individual or divided (modusy reyoshenija F.Johnson-Lerda's syllogisms, patterns of neural communications of P.Ta-garda, a support on ostensivnyj stimulus in the theory of relevance D.Sperbera and D.Wilson, etc.).

Results received thus are plausible ustanovyokami, more important for the subject, than logically true conclusion. ModeliYOrovanie corresponding processes gives possibility to define strategy of the decision of a problem, proceeding from substantial relevance, rate, availability of parcels that conducts to structural asymmetry any estestvenyono functioning system as integrativnoj the structure including both divided, and individual knowledge.

Among the basic characteristics inferentsy it is possible to name: obuslovlenyonost logic procedures of reception of conclusion, various steyopen reliability / credibility, konventsionalnost / individualyonost, conditionality a deducing context, a spontaneity / oposreyodovannost deducing, intuitivism / osoznavaemost, implitsitnost / eksyoplitsitnost, evristichnost / sequence, the specificity account pererayobotki knowledge (pertseptivnye, kategoralnye).

Similar characteristics give the chance to consider inferentsiju as the closest term to that is defined as VZ in present raboyote. However, from our point of view, despite the account of specificity of the natural
Conditions of realisation of understanding, inferentsionnaja the treatment not to the full covers feature of processing perceived by the individual inyoformatsii (on lines pertseptsii, kognitsii, emotionally-estimated pereyozhivany), does not consider specificity of value of unit of language as properties of the individual, is more often considered as the realised process assuming result expected "by default".

Thus, the support on achievements in various areas of a science at studying of process of understanding and VZ allows to carry out search integrayotivnogo the approach that gets a special urgency and puts forward a main objective creation integrativnoj the theory considered as aspect of the general theory of understanding.

<< | >>
A source: Golubeva Olga Vasilevna. THEORY OF EVIDENCE OF DISPLAY KNOWLEDGE: A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC APPROACH. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philology. Tver - 2016. 2016

More on topic 1.3. Research of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge in frameworks inferentsionnogo the approach:

  1. 1.2. A phenomenon of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge in frameworks koyognitivnogo directions in a science
  2. Chapter 3 eksperimertalnoe RESEARCH of PROCESS of UNDERSTANDING of the WORD / the TEXT With the SUPPORT ON VYVODNOE KNOWLEDGE
  3. a method of reconstruction of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge
  4. 1.5.2. Psycholinguistic bases of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge
  5. 1.6.4. Modelling of process of a support on vyvodnoe knowledge at understanding of a word / the text
  6. 3.5. Support models on vyvodnoe knowledge at understanding of the text
  7. 3.2. Support preconditions on vyvodnoe knowledge in the course of understanding
  9. 1.1. Fundamental procedural base of process of a support on vyvodnoe knowledge
  10. 3.4. The Experimental research of influence of external and internal parcels of a support on vyvodnoe knowledge
  11. 1.4. Expert knowledge as the factor of realisation of process of understanding in a context germenevticheskih researches
  13. 2.2. A technique of research of process of understanding of the text children of preschool age
  14. 2.3. Process of understanding reading. The abilities necessary for achievement of understanding