<<
>>

Introduction

Urgency of a theme of dissertational research. Sistemnost is the objective property of real-life objects revealed in the course of their knowledge. The given property is inherent also in the right, its any branch (including criminal law branches), that causes understanding of the right as internally ordered, adjusted and complete system of the legal phenomena.

In Bases of a state policy of the Russian Federation in sphere of development of legal literacy and sense of justice of citizens of 2011 it is specified, that lawful state development, formation of a civil society and strengthening of the national consent in Russia assume development of qualitative legal system, elimination of discrepancy of normative acts and creation of conditions for correct and uniform application of rules of law by all participants of legal dialogue. One of the major factors influencing a condition of legal literacy and sense of justice of citizens, the careful control over a condition of national legal system with a view of its optimisation, revealing of blanks and contradictions, their timely elimination [1] is. Effectively functioning legal system differs internal and external unity, stable organizational structure, presence of the concrete mechanisms providing its integrity.

At the same time sistemnost represents itself as the tool of informative activity for in the validity surrounding us the majority of the phenomena corresponds to parametres sistemnosti. Sistemnost as the method of knowledge of the Russian criminal law assumes an establishment of requirements to set of the interconnected criminally-legal phenomena on the basis of their analysis cause and effect and-or is functional-investigatory

Interactions, straight lines and feedback and development prospects. The given approach allows to define the maintenance of the Russian criminal law, to understand structure of branch system, to describe and predict its transformations, to reveal conditions of its effective functioning. Besides, the system approach comprises the new scheme of an explanation in which basis search of the concrete mechanisms supporting (keeping) integrity of branch of the Russian criminal law lays.

Property sistemnosti specifies that the Russian criminal law can execute the branch functions only by means of interaction of the sistemoobrazujushchih elements. Owing to system character of the right each legal phenomenon exists and operates not differently, as in communication and in unity with other legal and not legal phenomena. And defects of one ugolovnopravovogo a phenomenon can paralyse or deform action of other legal phenomena and processes. Therefore in process pravotvorcheskoj activity, in legal science and in legal practice the great value should be given to maintenance sistemnosti rules of law, subinstitutes, institutes and legal relations both on branch, and at interbranch level.

Unfortunately, within the limits of spent reforms and transformations necessity of mutual "coordination" of the various legal phenomena is quite often ignored. Permanent reforming of branch of criminal law (so, for twenty years of action of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation (further - UK the Russian Federation) was accepted more than two hundred laws on its change) lead its progressing faktorizatsii, i.e. To aspiration of branch system to reduction of its integrity and increase in independence of its elements, the last become more and more separated, less dependent from each other, and sometimes and contradicting each other.

Researchers repeatedly specified in injuriousness of the given tendency for the Russian criminal law, on its adverse influence on processes of functioning of branch system and their is social-legal consequences [2]. The revealed tendency blocks

Normal processes of criminally-legal regulation of public relations, functioning of branch system that can lead to loss of its basic properties and as a whole ability operate undermines. We will notice, that in the special literature it is underlined danger excessive progressing faktorizatsii, it is fraught with system decomposition on

- 3

Independent elements, and subsequently - it paralizatsiej and disintegration.

Thus, "chaotic" and repeated modification of text UK the Russian Federation testifies that zakonotvortsy internal and intersystem communications criminally-rules of law frequently do not consider, subinstitutes, institutes and legal relations, thereby as much as possible promoting occurrence of various defects and deformations in branch system, to easing of its integrity that is fraught with degradation of branch of criminal law, data on are not present reguljativno - guarding possibilities of the right in counteraction of criminality and protection of human rights.

Ignoring of system communications between rules of law, subinstitutes, institutes and legal relations quite often leads to occurrence of interbranch collisions and intrabranch mismatches (nesoglasovannostej). As the branch and interbranch mismatch which is growing out is underlined in the special literature,

Inconsistent development of the criminal legislation, it is aggravated against weight of unresolved problems, and first of all in sphere of regulation of the rights, legitimate interests and duties of subjects of criminal legal relations [3 [4]. It is obvious, that corresponding mismatches create considerable complexities in process pravoprimenitelnoj activity, generate possibility of any application of legal instructions contradicting each other,

Can lead to scale infringements of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and finally - to destabilization of uniform legal space of the Russian Federation.

However, despite the numerous interbranch legal validity numerous interbranch and intrabranch mismatches caused hasty, inconsistent, not always kriminologicheski by proved and juridiko-technically thought over decisions, despite lacking uniformity in pravoprimenitelnoj activity of bodies of the punitive justice and low level of sense of justice of the population, at domestic system criminal pravoohrany remains till now certain durability, it "is not scattered" under the influence of constants of "external influences» and «internal crises», is capable to resist and continue to function it more or less properly. The given situation staticizes a problem of search of special mechanisms and the factors playing sistemosohranjajushchuju a role in national legal system and in branch of criminal law in particular, testifies to necessity of a new sight at the Russian criminal law as on self-remaining system, revealings sistemoobrazujushchih and sistemosohranjajushchih elements of studied branch of law, research of processes of its self-organising, system interactions and dependences.

Let's especially notice, that now there are no the proceedings devoted to revealing and studying of concrete mechanisms, supporting (keeping) system properties of branch of the Russian criminal law. Taking into account the above-stated, rather sistemnosti the Russian criminal law it is possible to recognise set of teoretiko-applied questions with good reason as a large scientific problem which has great value for the criminally-legal doctrine, law-making and legal practice.

Degree of a scientific readiness of a theme of research. A number of scientific - philosophers (A.N.Averyanov, V.G.Afanasev, V.F.Gegel, I.Kant, F.Kapr, V.P.Kuzmin, N.Luman, M.Mesarovich, K.Popper, V.N.Sadovsky,

P.Fejerabend, etc.), investigating obshchefilosofskie problems sistemnosti, and also known experts in the field of theory of law and criminal law (S.S.Alekseev, V.K.Babayev, And. G.Bezverhov, A.I.Bojko, L. V.Inogamova-Hegaj, D.A.Kerimov, V.N.Kartashov, M.A.Kaufman, T. V.Klenova, V.P.Konjahin, L.L.Kruglikov, V.V. Lazarev, N.A.Lopashenko, and. V.Mickiewicz,

A. V.Naumov, Z.A.Neznamova, to. V.Obrazhiev, Ampere-second. Pigolkin, N.I.Pikurov, J.E.Pudovochkin, V.M.Syryh, M.D.Shargorodsky, And. V.Shishko,

B. F.ShChepelkov, P.S.Jani. V.Jatselenko and other authors) have brought

The essential contribution to doctrine development about sistemnosti in the right, including in the criminal. Last years a number of dissertations on separate aspects of a problem sistemnosti the Russian criminal law is protected. Among them it is necessary to note E.A.Chulichkovoj's works (2011), M.S.Zhuka (2013),

D.J.Goncharov (2014), And. P.Filchenko (2014), To. V.Obrazhieva (2015). Giving due to the contribution of these researchers to studying sistemnosti the Russian criminal law, we will notice, that complex knowledge of the given problem taking into account action of the special mechanism supporting (keeping) integrity of branch of the Russian criminal law, by them it was not carried out.

The present work is devoted is social-philosophical, teoretikopravovomu and to the applied analysis most doctrine prominent aspects about sistemnosti the Russian criminal law, to studying maloissledovannyh in a criminally-legal science of questions on branch system, its structure and functioning.

Object of the present dissertational research is the complex of the teoretiko-applied problems connected with existence and functioning of system of the Russian criminal law.

As an object of research act: system of the Russian criminal law and its basic characteristics (structure, signs), bases and laws of its functioning, interbranch collisions and intrabranch mismatches, and also the legal doctrine mentioning questions of system character of the right and its branches.

The purpose of dissertational research consists in developing logically complete theoretical doctrine about sistemnosti the Russian criminal law, capable to explain to law of functioning of branch system to predict directions of its development and to define ways of its perfection.

For achievement of the specified purpose following problems have been put and solved:

- To consider achievements of the general-theoretical doctrine about systems and to estimate prospects of their use within the limits of research of the Russian criminal law;

- To study methodological principles of the system approach and possibility of their application to research of the Russian criminal law;

- To reveal criteria of allocation of branch of criminal law in legal system of Russia;

- To characterise system of the Russian criminal law, its structure and signs;

- Comprehensively to investigate sistemoobrazujushchie elements of the Russian criminal law, their place and communications in considered system;

- To reveal theoretical and practical problems of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law, to offer author's variants of their permission;

- To investigate legallistic sources of the Russian criminal law as a basis of functioning of branch system;

- To analyse intersystem and intersystem communications of the Russian criminal law, to characterise their maintenance, kinds and integrativnye properties;

- To reveal laws of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law;

- To study action sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in the Russian criminal law, its elements, functions and value for branch system;

- To develop the perspective scientifically proved directions of perfection of system of the Russian criminal law.

Standard basis of research the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the international legal acts, decisions of the European court under human rights constitute, the Criminal code of the Russian Federation, the Criminally-executive code of the Russian Federation, the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, federal acts, decisions and definitions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the decision of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the criminal legislation of some foreign countries and other diplomas.

Theoretical base of research have constituted:

- sistemologicheskie A.N.Averyanov, P.K.Anokhin, V.G.Afanaseva, L.Bertalanfi's researches, And. V.Blauberga, V.V. Kachaly, M.Mesarovicha, V.D.Mogilevskogo, And. V.Prangishvili, V.N.Sadovsky. G.Yudin,

E. G.Yudin, and also results of application of the system approach to studying of the legal phenomena which are stated in A.I.Bojko, D.A.Kerimova, M.N.Marchenko's works, etc. jurists;

- The publications devoted to research sistemnosti of the right, prepared by experts in the general theory of law (S.S.Alekseev, M.I.Bajtin, V.N.Kartashov, V.V. Lazarev, And. V.Malko, G.V.Maltsev, M.N.Marchenko, N.I.Matuzov, And. V.Mickiewicz, V.S.Nersesjants, V.N.Sinjukov, V.M.Syryh, L.B.Tiunova, A.F.Shebanov);

- Proceedings And. G.Bezverhova, A.I.Bojko, JU. V.Golika, M.S.Zhuka, L. V.Inogamovoj-Hegaj, M.A.Kaufmana, And. G.Kibalnika, T. V.Klenovoj, I.J.Kozachenko, V.P.Konjahina, L.L.Kruglikov, And. V.Naumov, Z.A.Neznamovoj, to. V.Obrazhieva, N.I.Pikurova, J.E.Pudovochkina, M.D.Shargorodskogo, And. V.Shishko, V.F.ShChepelkova, P.S.Jani. V.Jatselenko and other representatives of a criminally-legal science in whom problems sistemnosti the Russian criminal law are investigated;

- Works in which researches concerning a theme adjacent problems of a criminally-legal science are analyzed: a subject ugolovnopravovogo regulations (N. V.Henry, N. M.Kropachev, And. V.Naumov, J.E.Pudovochkin. V.Jatselenko and others); criminally-rule of law and institutes (M.S.Zhuk, V.P.Konjahin, N.A.Lopashenko, N.I.Pikurov, V.D.Filimonov and others); criminal law sources (O.N.Bibik, And. V.Naumov, To. V.Obrazhiev, V.F.ShChepelkov and others); criminal law principles (M.M.Babayev, With. G.Kelina, V.V. Maltsev, J.E.Pudovochkin. V.Jatselenko and others), interbranch communications of criminal law (A.I.Bojko, D.J.Goncharov, N.I.Pikurov, And. V.Shishko and others).

The empirical base of research is presented by the data received as a result of the analysis and generalisation pravorazjasnitelnoj and kazualnoj of judiciary practice on criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; materials of 224 criminal cases which were in manufacture of federal courts and organs of inquiry of the Samara area; 154 sentences of vessels of the general jurisdiction of the Samara area; 297 sentences published in an electronic legal resource "RosPravosudie"; data of interrogation of 539 experts in the field of criminal law (135 judges and their assistants; 106 public prosecutor's workers; 177 inspectors; 75 investigators and 46 teachers and science officers of the Samara area and other subjects of the Russian Federation); results of questioning on scale Lajkerta of 552 citizens who do not have the juridical education.

By research preparation the results of empirical researches received by other scientists during research of separate aspects of the considered theme also were used.

Methodology and research methods. The research methodology is caused by the purposes, problems and structure of dissertational work. As a methodological basis of research the system approach which essence consists that an investigated subject - the branch of the Russian criminal law - is considered as system, complete formation instead of as set of parts constituting it acts. Accordingly, its structure, intersystem and intersystem communications, action sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in criminal law branch are studied complete, integrativnye properties of branch of the Russian criminal law.

Besides, by dissertation preparation the dialectic method of scientific knowledge making the demands to research of processes of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law in dynamics, and private-scientific methods are used also: istoriko-legal, sravnitelnopravovoj, is formal-logic, sociological and others.

Scientific novelty of the dissertation is defined by that it represents the research of branch of the Russian criminal law first in domestic jurisprudence from action positions in it special sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism. Results of this research meet a notable lack in the criminally-legal science, connected with studying sistemnosti the given branch of law.

Within the limits of the present research logically complete theoretical doctrine about sistemnosti the Russian criminal law, capable to explain to law of functioning of branch system is developed, to predict directions of its development and to define ways of its perfection; the author's definition of system of the Russian criminal law, based on modern achievements of the general theory of law is formulated; the structure of studied branch system is defined; its concrete kinds sistemoobrazujushchih elements and their role are analysed; offers on increase of their efficiency are proved; action sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in the Russian criminal law is proved, its elements, functions and value for branch system are defined; processes of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law are studied, the theoretical with given processes theoretical and practical problems are revealed, author's variants of their permission are offered; Legallistic sources of the Russian criminal law are with deep arguments defined as a basis of functioning of branch system; are revealed integrativnye properties of intersystem and intersystem communications of the Russian criminal law, their typological characteristics are established; laws of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law are opened; scientifically proved recommendations about optimisation of studied system and processes of its functioning are developed.

Novelty of research consists also in the positions which are taken out on protection:

1. It is proved, that the term "sistemnost" in the Russian criminal law is treated doubly: first, as property of branch revealed in the course of knowledge to possess integrity, differentsirovannostju, presence of elements and system communications, ability to self-organising, dynamism and relative stability (intrinsic signs of any system) and, in - the second, as the tool of informative procedures assuming the analysis of criminal law through a prism of branch and interbranch interactions, system communications as in branch, and from the outside, arising in the course of its functioning.

2. The conclusion that from positions of the system approach the criminal law is rather isolated part of legal system of the Russian Federation, representing logically complete uniform subsystem criminally - rules of law, subinstitutes, institutes and criminally-legal relations is drawn. The given subsystem is characterised by presence of own specific mode of legal regulation, processes of its functioning are directed on achievement of the branch purposes (maintenance of the law and order and maintenance special (branch) by means of safe coexistence of people in a society) and the decision of branch problems (guarding, preventive, educational and peace-making).

3. It is established, that the legal mode of criminal law is a special organisation reguljativnogo influences which is characterised by specific criminally-legal receptions of regulation - special order of occurrence and formation of rights and legal obligations, their realisation and the maintenance, specificity of sanctions, ways of their realisation, and also action uniform criminally-legal principles, the general provisions extending on given branch of law. The given mode is characterised by the imperativeness, primary use of interdictions and objazyvany, specific branch means of repressive (retaliatory) character (that thus does not exclude optionality displays in branch).

4. Necessity of use for the theory of criminal law of the term «system of the Russian criminal law» for accentuation of constant dynamics of branch, its development and changes in functioning process is given in addition reason. By research it is established, that system of the Russian criminal law is the special dynamic complex sistemoobrazujushchih the elements consolidated by functional isolation, unity of branch principles, the purposes and problems and self-organising.

5. It is revealed, that sistemoobrazujushchimi elements of the Russian criminal law are criminally-rule of law, subinstitutes, institutes and ugolovnopravovye relations. It is established, that they give branches the basic characteristics, form its maintenance, define its functioning and development directions, as a result of their interaction the criminal law is allocated integrativnymi with the qualities not peculiar to them separately,

6. The author's concept of criminally-legal institute under which difficult enough system formation consolidating criminally-rule of law and instructions, and sometimes means and the subinstitutes connected among themselves by functional interdependence, influencing rather independent part of the public relations carried to a subject of criminally-legal regulation which are aimed at the decision of a certain branch problem, or providing realisation of special function in this regulation is proved. It is proved, that ugolovnopravovye institutes can be realised as through rules of law and instructions, its forming, and through subinstitutes concerning them.

Subinstitutes represent primary standard a generality in branch system, they are intended for more successful and detailed decision of the problems facing to criminally-legal institutes. Subinstitutes possess ability of selective influence, carry out "alternative" reguljativnye functions, reflecting this or that specificity in corresponding subspecies criminally-legal relations. Subinstitutes are staticized when functional influence of criminally-legal institutes on public relations insufficiently or less effectively, than at realisation of subinstitutes. A substantiated conclusion, that the last actually "serve" criminally-legal institutes, are connected with them the general mission and the uniform purposes, enter into their maintenance, however thus play an independent role in branch system.

7. The conclusion is drawn, that criminally-legal relations also are

sistemoobrazujushchim an element of the Russian criminal law for all other elements of branch system get the legal value and the practical importance, only being realised in concrete ugolovnopravovyh relations. Existence of four groups of branch legal relations is given reason: guarding, paternalistskie,

Precautionary and reguljativnye.

8. All is established, that criminally-legal relations, irrespective of their kind, are characterised by presence of uniform object - safety of the person. All other kinds of safety are based on safety of the person (person), are estimated in a context of last. That is safety of the person is the that social phenomenon (condition), that social result for which achievement criminally-legal relations arise and exist, directing thus actions of people, officials and competent state bodies.

9. It is proved, that branch legallistic sources are a basis of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law. In the dissertation it is proved, that criterion of reference of this or that legal act to branch sources is its functional mission, that fact that is primary from the moment of acceptance for the given legal act pravotvorcheskimi bodies its role - participation in processes of criminally-legal regulation is predetermined, it is a main objective of its introduction in national legal system.

10. A substantiated conclusion about necessity to recognise at legislative level the Criminal code of the Russian Federation the basic legallistic source of the Russian criminal law and to fix its priority before other legal acts participating in regulation criminally-legal relations. It is necessary to consider all other legallistic sources of the given branch of law additional, at a regulation of corresponding public relations they join criminal law instructions, forming in a combination to them a uniform regulator.

11. The conclusion is drawn, that the system approach has caused necessity of research of communications and interactions sistemoobrazujushchih elements in the course of branch functioning. The author's concept of system communications of the Russian criminal law as relations between its elements, and also between them and the environment, reflecting their interdependence, conditionality is proved. Intersystem and intersystem communications of the Russian criminal law which, in turn, can be direct and return, direct and mediated (indirect), simple and difficult, strong and weak, genetic, by communications of submission (subordination) and coordination, functional, double (parallel) and correcting are revealed.

12. It is given reason, that existence and functioning of system of the Russian criminal law is subordinated to certain quantity of the laws which author's definition is formulated as display of objective rules of the branch interrelations, essential, constantly repeating characteristics of developments and action of branch system.

In the course of research following laws of functioning of system of the Russian criminal law are revealed and described: law of occurrence at branch system new integrativnyh the qualities not peculiar to its components (emerdzhentnosti), law of quantitative changes of properties of branch system (synergy), law of relative isolation of elements of system (additivity), law of maintenance of "dynamic balance» (homeostasis) of system, law of "a necessary variety», an optimality, self-preservation, self-organising, kommunikativnosti, hierarchies, potential efficiency and historicity.

16. It is proved, that in the Russian criminal law operates sistemosohranjajushchy the mechanism. The author's concept of this mechanism as complex sistemosohranjajushchih the elements providing integrity and unity of the right (both on interbranch, and on branch levels) is proved; as the original internal device forcing connected among themselves, but mobile elements of legal system to fulfilment of the necessary actions.

It is revealed, that structural elements sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in criminal law are branch principles, the purposes and problems, presumptions and fiction, prejuditsii, probelnye and conflict rules, pravopolozhenija.

17. In the course of research following cores are revealed and described

Functions sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in criminal law branch: obespechitelnaja the function including a minorant function of maintenance of constitutionality of branch of criminal law; reglamentatsionnaja; the attributive; konkretizatsionnaja; operatively-protective;

pravovospolnitelnaja; signalno-information and prognosticheskaja.

Results of the carried out research have allowed to make offers on perfection of management by system of the Russian criminal law and strengthening of intersystem and intersystem communications:

1. To state item 1 UK the Russian Federation in the following edition:

«Article 1. The criminal legislation of the Russian Federation

1. The criminal legislation of the Russian Federation consists of the present Code. The novels providing the criminal liability, come under to inclusion in the present Code. Positions of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation have a priority before other legal acts accepted for the purpose of settlement criminally-legal relations.

2. The present Code is based on the Constitution of the Russian Federation both the conventional principles and norms of international law. The positions of the present Code recognised unconstitutional, lose a validity and do not come under to application.

3. The international treaties which are coming under to direct application in territory of the Russian Federation, certificates about amnesties, the governmental orders of the Russian Federation accepted for standard maintenance of certain articles of Special part UK the Russian Federation, decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on discrepancy (conformity) of positions UK the Russian Federation and (or) practice of their application of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and also the decision of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation about judiciary practice on criminal cases are sources of the Russian criminal law ».

2. To state item 3 UK the Russian Federation in the following edition:

«1. The act criminality, and also its punishability are defined only by the present Code.

2. Criminal law application by analogy concerning socially dangerous acts, to it not provided, is not supposed.

3. The criminal law does not come under to extensive interpretation ».

3. To add General part UK the Russian Federation of item 8.1"the Basic concepts used in the present Code» in which to explain the basic concepts used in the criminal legislation. Chapter 1 UK the Russian Federation to rename in «Problems, principles and concepts of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation».

4. To subject to reforming punishment under criminal law institute: in - the first to exclude arrest as a kind of punishment from system of punishments under criminal law and from sanctions of articles of the Special part in which it is mentioned, and also to recognise item 54 UK the Russian Federation become invalid. Secondly, at replacement of imprisonment with forced hard labour in an order provided ch. 2 items 53.1 UK the Russian Federation, the last should be appointed that size, which judge has originally defined for imprisonment even if article sanction allows to appoint more severe term of forced hard labour. For mismatch elimination between the permissive rule about possibility of replacement of imprisonment by forced hard labour and sanctions prohibitive criminally-rules of law it is obviously necessary to result in conformity with each other terms of the above-stated punishments in sanctions of articles of Special part UK the Russian Federation (for example, in ch. 2 items 121, ch. 2 items 127.1 UK the Russian Federation, etc.).

5. To add section VI «Other measures of criminally-legal character» with chapter 14.1"Forced measures of educational influence», regulating legal effects of fulfilment of socially dangerous acts provided UK the Russian Federation, the persons who have not reached age of the criminal liability.

6. With a view of adequate reflexion of intersystem and intersystem communications of investigated branch of law in the criminal legislation to make changes in item 151 item, 226.1, 295-298, 300, 302, 303, 310, 313, 322.3, ch. 2 items 325 UK the Russian Federation, having improved criminally-rule of law about involving of the minor in fulfilment of antisocial actions, about contraband, about fictitious statement on the account of the foreign subject or the stateless person in a place of stay in premises in the Russian Federation, about crimes against public justice, an order of management, etc.

Theoretical value of results of dissertational research consists that their set forms the scientific concept sistemnosti the Russian criminal law, allowing to reveal laws of functioning and development of branch system, and also capable to form a basis for its perfection. Dissertation positions open action sistemosohranjajushchego the mechanism in branch of criminal law and deepen theoretical representations about criminally-rules of law, institutes and subinstitutes, criminally-legal relations, about their communications among themselves, and also about interbranch communications in national legal system that promotes development of a criminally-legal science as a whole.

The applied importance of research consists in possibility of use of its positions and conclusions in legislative and other pravotvorcheskoj activity in the course of perfection formalnojuridicheskih sources of the Russian criminal law; in judicial-investigatory practice at investigation and consideration of criminal cases; in study with students of high schools of a legal profile, in system of improvement of professional skill of judges, public prosecutors, inspectors, investigators, and also others pravoprimenitelej.

Degree of reliability and approbation of results of research. Necessary degree of reliability of the received results is defined by use of extensive information base, including theoretical positions and the conclusions containing in fundamental and applied proceedings of domestic and foreign scientists, application of the general and private scientific methods of knowledge and representative base of sociological and statistical data.

Dissertation substantive provisions are stated in three monographies in total amount 38,8 items of l., 1 manual in volume 7,9 items of l. And 76 articles published in magazines and collections of materials scientific konfrentsy, including, in 29 articles in the reviewed scientific magazines included in the list recommended VAK.

Substantive provisions and the conclusions containing in the dissertation, were a point of issue on international and interdepartmental nauchnoprakticheskih conferences: annual scientific conferences of teachers and employees FGAOU IN «the Samara national research university of akad. With. P.Koroleva», Samara juristic institution FSIN of Russia, the Samara humanitarian academy, the All-Russia state university of justice, the Moscow state university of M.V.Lomonosova, the Moscow state legal university of O.E.Kutafina, the Russian state university of justice, etc.

Research materials are introduced in activity of Committee on the legislation, legality and to the law and order and legal department of the device of the Samara provincial thought, and also «Interbranch collisions» at the Samara national research university of the academician are used by the author in the course of teaching of a course of criminal law and a special course With. P.Koroleva, by preparation of legal opinions on projects of federal acts about modification in UK the Russian Federation and other federal acts (for example, participation in public examination of project FZ № 15810-7, response preparation on the draught federal law «About modification of article 17 of the Code of the Russian Federation about administrative violations» (regarding an establishment of an order of application of positions of the law establishing administrative responsibility in connection with decriminalization of separate acts) etc.).

The dissertation structure is formulated according to its purpose, tasks in view and logic of research. The executed work consists of the introduction, two sections and four heads including twelve paragraphs, the conclusions, the bibliographic list and four appendices.

<< | >>
A source: Denisov Anna Vasilevna. SISTEMNOST RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW: the THEORY, the LAW, PRACTICE . 2018

More on topic Introduction:

  1. in introduction
  2. INTRODUCTION
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. 10.1. Introduction
  5. INTRODUCTION
  6. approbation and introduction of results.
  7. Introduction
  8. Introduction
  9. INTRODUCTION
  10. INTRODUCTION