<<

THE APPENDIX

the Appendix 1

the Information inquiry on dynamics of repeated criminality among condemned to punishment in the form of freedom restriction (after statement on the account in UII), including with application of the equipment the SAMPLE

was not applied was applied
╣ p/p Criteria of an estimation of dynamics of repeated criminality Condemned to which the equipment the SAMPLE Condemned to which the equipment the SAMPLE
2016 2017 1 items 2018 2016 2017 1 items 2018
1 Quantity condemned, standing on the account in UII:
1. 1 In total 207 189 127 168 281 224
1. 1. 1 from

them:

men 171 168 102 156 249 197
1. 1. 2 women 34 17 25 12 32 23
1. 1. 3 minors 2 4 0 10 4 4
1. And Quantity condemned, made return to crime:
1. 1 In total 6 1 7 2 1 5
1. 1. 1 from

them:

men 6 1 6 2 1 5
1. 1. 2 women 0 0 1 0 0 0
1. 1. 3 minors 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 Quantity condemned, serving time in the form of freedom restriction as:
2. 1 a punishment principal view 204 182 123 168 281 221
2.
2
a punishment auxiliary view 3 7 4 0 0 3
2. And Quantity condemned, made the return to crime, serving time in the form of freedom restriction as:
2. 1 a punishment principal view 6 1 1 2 1 4
2. 2 a punishment auxiliary view 0 0 1 0 0 1
3 Quantity condemned, made return to crime, depending on the enduring the punishment period:
from the moment of statement on the account from the moment of application of the equipment the SAMPLE
3. 1 from 1 till 2 months 1 1 1 2 1 0
3. 2 from 2 till 4 months 1 0 1 0 0 4
3. 3 from 4 till 6 months 3 0 0 0 0 1
3. 4 from 6 months till 1 year 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. 5 from 1 year till 2 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. 6 from 2 till 3 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. 7 from 3 till 4 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 the Quantity condemned, made return to crime is proportional to time of days:
4. 1. 1 in the morning (6. 00-10. 00) 1 0 0 0 0 0
4. 1. 2 in the afternoon (10. 00-18. 00) 1 1 1 1 1 1
4. 1. 3 in the evening (18. 00-22. 00) 3 0 0 2 0 4

4. 1. 4 at night (22. 00-6. 00) 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 Age condemned, made return to crime:
5. 1 14-16 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. 2 16-18 years 1 0 0 0 0 0
5. 3 18-20 years 1 1 0 0 0 0
5. 5 20-25 years 2 0 0 2 0 1
5. 6 25-30 years 0 0 0 0 1 0
5. 7 30-35 years 1 0 0 1 0 1
5. 8 35-40 years 0 0 2 0 0 0
5. 9 40-45 years 0 0 0 0 0 2
5. 10 45-50 years 0 0 0 0 0 1
5. 11 50-55 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. 12 55-60 years 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. 13 60 years also are more senior 0 0 0 0 0 0
╣ p/p Criteria of an estimation of dynamics of repeated criminality ABOUT

p

oboru

suzhdennye, to which not rimenjalos dovanie the SAMPLE with kotor oboru suzhdennye, to ym it was applied dovanie the SAMPLE
2016 2017 1 items 2018 2016 2017 1´.2018
6 Labour ' educational) employment of the condemned:
6. 1 have not been occupied by work or study 136 124 77 63 107 73
6. 2 worked (studied) 71 65 50 105 174 151
6. And Labour (educational) employment condemned, made returns to crime:
6. 1 have not been occupied by work or study 4 0 2 2 1 5
6. 2 worked (studied) 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 Formation condemned, made return to crime:
7. 1 an elementary education

(to 9 classes)

4 1 0 3 1 3
7. 2 incomplete secondary education (9 classes) 1 0 2 0 0 0
7. 3 full secondary education

(11 classes)

0 0 0 0 0 2
7. 4 the average professional education

(technical school, college)

0 0 0 0 0 0
7. 5 higher education 0 0 0 0 0 0
the Marital status condemned, made return to crime:
8 Is married 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. 1 It is dissolved 1 0 0 0 0 1
8. 2 It is single 4 1 2 2 1 4
the State of health condemned, made return to crime:
9 practically healthy 5 1 2 2 0 4
9. 1 patients the chronic

diseases (excepting a tuberculosis, a HIV, a hepatitis, a narcotism, an alcoholism)

0 0 0 0 0 1
9. 2 patients socially - 0 0 0 0 0 0

was not applied was applied are initiated
significant diseases (a tuberculosis, a HIV, a hepatitis, a narcotism, an alcoholism)
9. 3 the having mental

deviations

0 0 0 0 1 0
9. 4 invalids 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 the Previous conviction condemned, made return to crime:
10. 1 earlier not sudimyj 0 1 0 0 1 0
10. 2 earlier sudimyj 4 0 2 2 0 5
11 Articles on which the condemned have made return to crime:
Specify all numbers (part) of articles UK the Russian Federation 166 ch. 1, 105 ch. 1, 166 ch. 2

the item

"and",

158

ch. 2

the item

,

166

ch. 1

158 ch. 3 items

"and"

228 ch. 1,

229 ch. 1,

158 ch. 1

112 ch. 1,

112

ch. 1,

112

ch. 1

158

ch. 2

105 ch. 1,

158 ch. 3, the item "and", 159 ch. 1, 158 ch. 2 items "and", 119

ch. 1

12 Quantity condemned, made return to crime and consisting in risk group:
- - - - - -
13 Quantity condemned, made return to crime in state of drunkenness:
4 0 0 2 | 0 0
╣ p/p Criteria of an estimation of dynamics of repeated criminality Condemned to which the equipment the SAMPLE Condemned to which the equipment the SAMPLE
2015 2016 1 items 2018 2015 2016 1 items 2018
14 Presence of encouragements or collectings at condemned, made return to crime:
14. 1 had the prevention 4 0 1 0 0 1
14. 2 had the official

caution

2 0 0 0 0 4
14. 3 had no collectings 0 1 1 0 0 0
14. 4 had encouragements 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 the Finding in search condemned, made return to crime:
15. 1 in which relation were spent PRM 0 0 0 0 1 0
15. 2 put on the wanted list 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 the Place of residence condemned, made return to crime:
16. 1 a city 1 1 1 1 1 0
16. 2 a countryside 4 0 1 1 0 5
17 Quantity condemned in which relation criminal cases

for return to crime fulfilment (after statement on the account):
6 1 2 2 1 5
18 Quantity condemned, struck off the register UII in connection with condemnation for return to crime fulfilment (after statement on account UII):
6 0 1 1 0 5

the Appendix 2

THE QUESTIONNAIRE "SOP"

(Propensity to deviating behaviour [263] )

THE FORM OF ANSWERS

the Surname And. O ___________ a floor __________ Age ___________

Yes/is not present Yes/is not present ─Ó/He˛ Yes/is not present Yes/▓ │ ?t ─Ó/He˛
1 19 37 55 73 91
2 20 38 56 74 92
3 21 39 57 75 93
4 22 40 58 76 94
5 23 41 59 77 95
6 24 42 60 78 96
7 25 43 61 79 97
8 26 44 62 80 98
9 27 45 63 81 99
10 28 46 64 82 100
11 29 47 65 83 101
12 30 48 66 84 102
13 31 49 67 85 103
14 32 50 68 86 104
15 33 51 69 87 105
16 34 52 70 88 106
17 35 53 71 89 107
18 36 54 72 90 108

Results

Scales

Points

the Scale

1

the Scale

2

the Scale

3

the Scale

4

the Scale

5

the Scale

6

the Scale

7

the Scale

8

Primary points
Correction
Primary points with

correction

T-points

THE TABLE OF THE APPROXIMATED VALUES OF FACTORS OF CORRECTION

the Man's variant the Female variant
"Crude" points on correction Factors "Crude" points on a scale ╣ 1 correction Factors
0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5
1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
3 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 1
4 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2
5 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 2
6 1 2 3 5 1 2 2 3
7 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 1 2 2 3
8 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4
9 2 3 4 5 5 6 8 2 2 3 4
10 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 0 3 4 5
11 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 2 3 4 5
11 2 3 4 6
12 2 4 5 6

the Appendix 3

Table 1. Kinds of infringements of legality employees ş ugolovnoispolnitelnyh inspections

g 400

II

the indicator Name Year
2014 2015 2016 2017
a work Unaccordance, a free establishment of the size of a payment, refusal to aid of appropriate medical aid 325 268 245 243
Illegal change of conditions of the control over condemned 6 9 21 11
Illegal deprivation or granting of the rights condemned 16 24 25 32
Deliberate entering of doubtful data on serviceable performance of the duties assigned by court condemned 9 2 10 6
Infringement of rules of application the SAMPLE, etc. spetssredstv the control condemned 0 0 2 4

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

YEARS

Infringement of rules of application the SAMPLE, etc. spetssredstv the control condemned

the Appendix 4

THE QUESTIONNAIRE

for interrogation of employees of criminally-executive system

the Question answer Variants Results, %
1 2 3
1. Your age ) till 29 years (inclusive) 40
) 30-39 years 40
) 40 years also are more senior 20
2. Your experience of work in UIS ) till 3 years 16
) 3-5 years 32
) 5-10 years 30
) 10-20 years 18
) more than 20 years 4 %
3. Your formation ) the higher legal 46
) other higher 48
) not finished the higher 0
) other (specify) 4
4. Necessary measures in criminal policy perfection in sphere of appointment and execution of punishments in the form of freedom restriction ) it is necessary to expand sphere of application of punishments in the form of freedom restriction 20
) it is necessary to narrow sphere of application of punishments in the form of freedom restriction 56
) the sphere of application of punishments in the form of freedom restriction is optimum now 24

5. Define a parity by efficiency of application of punishment in the form of restriction of freedom with punishment in videlishenija freedom ) punishments in the form of imprisonment are more effective 86
) punishments in the form of freedom restriction are more effective 14
) other (specify) 0
6. What kind of the punishment which have been not connected with imprisonment, in your opinion, is the most perspective? ) the penalty 8
) obligatory works 24
) correctional labour 2
) freedom restriction 62
) other (specify) 8
7. What kind of the punishment which have been not connected with imprisonment, in your opinion, is the most problem and ineffective? ) the penalty 8
) obligatory works 2
) correctional labour 86
) freedom restriction 4
) other (specify) 0
8. More effective in achievement of the purpose of punishment is appointment to the person who has committed a crime of small or average weight, or for the first time made grave crime, punishments in a kind: ) awarding punishment in the form of imprisonment is conditional 62
) awarding punishment in the form of freedom restriction 32
) other (specify) 6

9. What measures of influence on condemned for evasion from enduring the punishment in the form of freedom restriction are more effective? ) reprimand 0
) the prevention in writing about commutation by other kind 90
) other 10
10. What principal cause of insufficient efficiency of punishments in the form of freedom restriction? ) absence of the effective mechanism of impeachment of the persons evading from their serving 8
) insufficient staff ş ugolovnoispolnitelnyh inspections as the basic division executing punishments, not connected with execution of punishment under criminal law in the form of freedom restriction 0
) lacks of a legislative regulation of execution of punishment in the form of freedom restriction 28
) all set forth above 64
) other (specify) 0
11. Necessary actions on perfection of efficiency of execution of punishment in the form of freedom restriction ) obespecheniekontrolja for condemned from the party ş ugolovnoispolnitelnyh inspections 0
) maintenance condemned by work 56
) elimination of contradictions in the legislation 42
) other (specify) 0

the Appendix 5

the Questionnaire for interrogation condemned, leaving punishments in the form of freedom restriction

the Question answer Variants Results, %
1 2 3
1. A floor ) man's 81
) female 19
2. Age ) 16-20 years 3, 9
) 21-30 years 26, 9
) 31-40 years 50
) is more senior 41 19, 2
3. The Marital status ) I have family 50
) no family I have 50
4. Formation ) an incomplete average 19
) an average 46
) an average professional 35
) the higher 0
) other 0
5. The Occupation before condemnation ) the worker 31
) serving 0
) the pupil 4
) the businessman 0
) the unemployed 65
6. Quantity of previous convictions ) one 65
) two and more 35
7. Character of the committed crime ) against the person 31
) against the property 38
) another 31

8. What punishment to you is appointed? ) the penalty 0
) the debaring to occupy certain posts or to be engaged in certain activity 0
) obligatory works 8
) correctional labour 61
) freedom restriction 41
9. Whether you before condemnation used spirits? ) yes, but it is rare 50
) regularly 38
) no 15
10. Whether you committed crimes in group? ) yes 15
) no 85
11. Whether you maintain relations with them? ) yes 53
) no 47
12. How the remained mutual relations with accomplices influence your behaviour? ) it is positive 21
) it is negative 14
) in any way 65
13. Whether there are in your environment other persons because of which influence you break an enduring the punishment order? ) yes 16
) no 84
15. Whether you supposed evasion from serving of the punishment appointed to you? ) supposed () 62
) did not suppose () 38
17. Whether disciplinary measures for evasion from serving of punishments were applied to you? ) were applied 73
) were not applied 27
18. What disciplinary measures to you were applied? ) reprimand 0
) the prevention in writing about commutation by other kind 91
) other (specify) 9
19. Whether you consider, what disciplinary measures applied to you were fair? ) yes 58
) no 42
20. Whether you made ) yes 18

repeated infringement of conditions and an enduring the punishment order?
) no 82
21. Whether you consider punishment in the form of restriction of freedom by less strict, than imprisonment? ) yes 85
) no 15
22. Whether consider the appointed

to you court punishment by the fair?

) yes 84
) no
16

<< |
A source: Hodzhaliev Saleh Ajsaevich. the Theory and practice of restriction of freedom as punishment kind. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of the master of laws. Grozny - 2019. 2019

More on topic THE APPENDIX:

  1. the Appendix
  2. the Appendix 4
  3. the Appendix
  4. THE APPENDIX
  5. the Appendix
  6. THE APPENDIX
  7. the APPENDIX 4
  8. the Appendix
  9. the Appendix
  10. the Appendix
  11. the Appendix
  12. the Appendix
  13. THE APPENDIX
  14. the Appendix
  15. the Appendix