<<
>>

the Appendix Results of studying of 1200 criminal cases on structures of the crimes which subject was the official

Structure of the mechanism of malfeasance

№№ Question Absolute data Percent
1. Whether crime preparation took a place &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; Preparation took place 835 69,58
&nbsp; It is made without preliminary preparation 365 30,42
2. Preparation consisted [1]: From 835 (100 %)
&nbsp; In search of crime instruments 121 14.49
&nbsp; In preparation of corresponding documents 721 86,35
&nbsp; In forging of documents 59 7,07
&nbsp; In priiskanii other participants of a crime 270 32,34
&nbsp; In creation of a criminal situation 437 52,34
2. The initiator of committing a crime &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; The official 1040 86,67
&nbsp; Not the official 160 13,33
3. The crime is made &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; In working hours 974 81,17
&nbsp; In out of working hours 226 18,83
4. The crime scene: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; Office office 341 28,42
&nbsp; Authority building 259 21,58
&nbsp; In the dwelling 72 6
&nbsp; Other place which has been not connected with service and dwelling 271 22,58
&nbsp; In the car 137 11,42
&nbsp; In several places 120 10
5. In committing a crime participated: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; One official 782 65,17
&nbsp; Two and more officials 349 29.08
&nbsp; The official in partnership with not the official 69 5,75
6. At committing a crime are used: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; The weapon, 85 7,08
&nbsp; The special technics 36 3
&nbsp; Cars 192 16
7. Harm is caused in a kind: [1] &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; Infringements of the rights and interests of the person (citizen) 769 64,08
&nbsp; Infringements of the rights and interests of legal bodies 372 31
&nbsp; Infringements of interests of the state 270 22,5
&nbsp; Property damage 731 60,92
&nbsp; Physical harm 259 21,58
8. Amount of damage: From 731 (100 %)
&nbsp; To 50 thousand roubles 209 28,59
&nbsp; To 100 thousand roubles 187 25,5
&nbsp; To 1 million roubles 235 32,1
&nbsp; To 10 million roubles 63 8,61
&nbsp; Over 10 million roubles 37 5,06
9. Presence of victims: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; There are no remedial victims 12 1
&nbsp; Sustained not remedially (suffered) (items 290) 241 20
&nbsp; One victim 465 30,42
&nbsp; Two and more sustained 447 46,7
&nbsp; 10 and more sustained 35 3
10. At committing a crime it is broken: [1] &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; The federal legislation 1035 86,25
&nbsp; The regional legislation 352 29,33
&nbsp; Interdepartmental norms 670 55,83
&nbsp; Domestic situations, orders, instructions 881 73,42
11. After committing a crime, the criminal &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; Has disappeared 128 10,67
&nbsp; Did not disappear 997 83,08
&nbsp; Has tried to disappear 75 6,25
12. After direct committings a crime, the criminal &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; Has destroyed crime traces 352 29,33
&nbsp; Has partially destroyed crime traces 404 33,67
&nbsp; Has not destroyed crime traces 444 37
<< | >>
A source: Halikov Asljam Nailevich.
THEORY And PRACTICE of REVEALING And INVESTIGATION of MALFEASANCES (CRIMINALISTIC ASPECT). 2005

More on topic the Appendix Results of studying of 1200 criminal cases on structures of the crimes which subject was the official:

  1. § 2. Specificity of a subject and proving limits on criminal cases about crimes of terrorist character
  2. THE APPENDIX 1 PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION THE DECISION PROJECT ABOUT JUDICIARY PRACTICE ON CRIMINAL CASES ABOUT CONTINUOUS CRIMES
  3. § 3. The Legal status of subjects of proving and system of criminal procedure relations between them at a stage of preliminary investigation of criminal cases about crimes of terrorist character
  4. § 1. Objective signs of structures of the crimes providing responsibility for creation of the criminal society (the criminal organisation) under the criminal legislation of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
  5. § 2. Subjective signs of structures of the crimes providing responsibility for creation of the criminal society (the criminal organisation) under the criminal legislation of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
  6. § 5. Classification of crimes against departure of the international criminal justice. Concept of "official" of the international criminal court
  7. the Appendix Results of studying of materials concerning officials on whom decisions about refusal in criminal case excitation (all are taken out is studied 720 materials)
  8. the Operatively-search actions, which results are used in proving on criminal cases about bribes
  9. Remedial problems of realisation of an extradition of the persons who have committed crimes at investigation of criminal cases
  10. the APPENDIX 2 Interrogation of judges of the Supreme Court of the Republic Bashkortostan, considering criminal cases
  11. Chapter 2. PROVING CARRYING out ON CRIMINAL CASES About CRIMES of TERRORIST CHARACTER In the STAGE of PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
  12. the Chapter III. Questions of application of norm on abusing official powers in investigatory both judiciary practice and directions of perfection of the criminal law about responsibility for official abusings
  13. APPENDIX Z Interrogation of public prosecutors of the criminally-judicial management participating in consideration of criminal cases by vessels
  14. CHAPTER 2 Separate questions of reception and use of results of HORDES in proving on criminal cases about bribery
  15. CHAPTER 2. The criminally-legal characteristic of structures of the crimes providing responsibility for creation prestupyonogo of community (the criminal organisation) on UK Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
  16. the Appendix 3 Classification of crimes against religion by the Criminal code of 1903 On the basis of object of an encroachment
  17. the Appendix 1. The questionnaire for studying of expert opinion on problems of the criminal liability for breach of law on a freedom of worship and creeds