<<
>>

Conclusions

Summarizing the conducted supervision and passing to higher step of generalisation, it is possible to draw some short conclusions.

1. The most universal method of a nomination of persons in FET Russian and English of languages is the syntactic method, with which help are formed compound (not brief, multicomponent) names of persons from them make the Large part attributive two-componental designs (an order of 60 % of all multicomponent terms with significance of the person in Russian and 85 % - in English) Syntactic formation NL in language of economic sphere is usually carried out as a result of specialisation of significance of the defined name of the person by means of introduction of the definition limiting width of its significance.

in Russian FET it is possible to consider as Specificity NL of a syntactic method of formation availability among them a significant amount of the formations consisting from

of four and more words (29,5 % from number of all not brief names in comparison with 2 % in English). Names such can be carried, most likely, to preterms - to units of the period of an initial designation of the persons who are subjects of economic activities 2. Quantitative disproportions in methods of a nomination in compared languages can be accompanied and their qualitative distinctions. So, for example, in English language the second by quantity of the names of persons formed with its help is the morphological method (16 % of all NL), actively acting both in terminological, and in professional lexicon. Among NL a morphological method of formation suffixal nouns are most frequency (basically, with suffixes-egAog) Conversion and truncation of bases are less extended and characteristic, basically, for formation of units of professional lexicon with significance of the person

In Russian FET the morphological method participates in formation only 5, 7 % NL. In particular, the suffixal method, long time remaining practically undivided at formation of terms with significance of the person as have shown results of the conducted analysis, last time gives in.

on the other hand, in professional communications for a nomination of the persons having official terminological (as a rule, multicomponent) names, are actively used new growths with suffixes-shchik/chik,-nik,-ik which can be carried to examples kompressivnogo word-formations. 3 At outwardly sootnosimom total of the names formed in the morfologo-syntactic method, attract attention essential divergences in number of names of separate groups of the terms allocated on the basis of distinctions in character of relations between components of difficult words.

so, in Russian recently it is traced the tendency to increasing quantity of "analytisms" (the difficult names which both parts are NL) At the same time, enough representative by quantity of nominations entering into it still remains group of composit names of persons on-tel which first component characterises the person on object (sphere) of activity.

In English language of economic sphere the synthetic composites consisting of a noun, an attributive component acting in a role, and defined NL dominate, Specific for English FET it is possible to name also

formation of the initsialno-alphabetic abbreviations serving to the purposes of reduction multicomponent NL

<< | >>
A source: TRUFANOVA Natalia Olegovna. THE PROBLEM OF THE NOMINATION OF PERSONS IN FINANCIALLY-EKONOMICHESKOJTERMINOLOGII (ON THE MATERIAL OF RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH OF LANGUAGES). 2006

More on topic Conclusions:

  1. CONCLUSIONS ON CHAPTER 1
  2. Conclusions
  3. Conclusions
  4. Conclusions
  5. conclusions
  6. Conclusions
  7. conclusions
  8. CONCLUSIONS
  9. conclusions
  10. Conclusions
  11. conclusions
  12. Conclusions
  13. Conclusions
  14. conclusions
  15. conclusions
  16. Conclusions
  17. conclusions
  18. Conclusions
  19. Conclusions