<<
>>

methodical approaches to an efficiency estimation «managements by results» in public management

Now there is a big set of indicators of an estimation efyofektivnosti governments, efficiency of activity of bodies vlayosti. The problematics of dissertational research has dictated necessity of transplantation of toolkit of an estimation of efficiency of a state administration in dejatelyonost bodies of public management.

Polterovich V. M asserts, that «proyotsess drawings of the institutes which have developed in others institutsionalnoj to environment, we name transplantation» [86]. Sharing of an item of the scientist, it is necessary to confirm about necessity of transplantation of toolkit of an estimation of efficiency gosuyodarstvennogo managements in activity of bodies of public management.

As to domestic techniques of an estimation of efficiency gosudarstvenyonogo managements in I.N.Bartsits's work describes a technique, podgotovyolennuju in 2004 representation of Institute of the World bank for miniyosterstva economic development and trade of the Russian Federation under nazvayoniem «Integrated indicators of efficiency of reform of the government». It includes following integrated indicators, predstavlenyonye in table 11 [87]. According to the author, the given technique has a number of defects, therefore as I.N.Bartsits's advanced technique has offered isyopolzovat parametres of an estimation of the efficiency, presented on drawing 25.

Drawing 25 - Criteria of an estimation of efficiency of public management by I.N.Bartsitsa88's technique

In I.N.Bartsits's developed technique completely has altered klassifiyokatsii criteria of an estimation of efficiency, it has subdivided them into 5 groups, each of which in turn includes the big set podkriteriev.

88 Bartsits, I.N.constitutional law on good (effective) management: criteria, indicators, estimations [Text] / I.N.Bartsits//the Constitutional and municipal right, 2013. - № 11. - With. 64-71.

Table 11 - Indicators of an estimation of efficiency of public management of the World bank for the Ministry of economic development and trade of Rosyosijsky Federation

The indicator name The indicator contents
Government indicator Includes include six indexes: a vote it the accountability, political stability and absence of violence,

Efficiency of the government, quality of the legislation. Leadership of the law, the corruption control

The indicators received as a result of the World inspection of the enterprises Allow to receive a comparative estimation of a state policy of the business

Climate, regulations, level of corruption of quality of the state services in an interaction context between business

The state

The indicators received as a result of inspection of the enterprises in the countries with transitive economy Allow to compare quality of management, the business climate, the competitive environment, corruption level in a context

Interactions between business and

The state in the countries with transitive economy

Index of perception of corruption of the organisation The compound index based on.
The given 17 various researches conducted by 13 independent organisations among

Businessmen and local analysts, and also interrogations of inhabitants of the concrete country — both its citizens, and foreigners; the given index defines level

Corruption in the world

Barometre of world corruption of the organisation Evaluates level of corruption proceeding from average estimations and opinions of the person
Index of economic freedom

The organisations t

informatsionnej its basis

Formations are data

The governmental and non-governmental organisations, results between national and national sociological interrogations

Opacity index It is presented in the form of the integrated factor of opacity which is based on a combination from five primary

Indicators, characterise their following spheres influencing capital market: corruption in the state bodies, the laws regulating the rights

Properties, economic policy, financing standards; regulation komm ercheskoj leja telnosti

Efficiency indicators

Sovereign tv ennogo managements

Opinions of civil servants measured on the basis of researches and the population

*Составлено the author by results of research

In the researches Kryzhanovsky Island A describes a number of the international criteria of an estimation of a management efficiency the state. The author transfers following integrated indicators for an estimation of efficiency of the public management, developed not state international organizatsijayomi, presented in table 12 [88].

Table 12 - the International indexes of an estimation of efficiency of public management

Index The index contents
Index of the global

Competitiveness

It is based on a combination of popular statistical data and results of interrogation of chiefs of the companies — extensive annual researches which are conducted together with a network of the partner organisations — leading research institutes and the companies in the various countries.
Index of quality of a life and well-being of older persons in the countries міра Has been offered and calculated in 2015 by the International non-governmental organisation HeipAge International together with the Institutional foundation of the Incorporated Nations in the field of the population; for account of an indicator researchers were guided by the methodology based on consisting еизи13 of indicators, united in chetre the basic groups material security, a state of health, formation and the employment, favorable conditions
Index of the social

Progress

The combined indicator of the international

Research project The Social Progress Imperative which measures achievements of the countries of the world from the point of view of public well-being and social progress; ivdeks it is defined with allowance for over 50 indicators united in three basic groups basic needs of the person, OSNOEY well-being of the person, possibility of development of the person

Index of the human

Developments

It is a cumulative indicator of a level of development of the person in the country, measuring achievements of the country from the point of view CONSISTING NIJA health, reception of formation and an actual yield of its citizens, in three basic directions: health and the longevity measured by an indicator of the expected

Life expectancies at a birth; access to the formation, measured by level of literacy of adult population and cumulative gross factor?! Coverage by formation; the worthy standard of living measured in size of a gross internal product (gross national product) per capita in US dollars at par of buying power (PPS)

*Составлено the author by results of research of the Kryzhanovsky Island And.

In connection with the big variety of criteria and estimation techniques effektivyonosti public management, in the Russian Federation, according to Decree PreziYOdenta the Russian Federation from 21.08.2012 №1199 «About an estimation of efficiency of activity of bodies
Executive power of subjects of the Russian Federation », has been entered ofitsiyoalnyj a set of the criteria, allowing to evaluate work of the state bodies. According to the decree, for a government estimation it is necessary to use sleyodujushchie indicators (drawing 26) [89].

Indicators which are used for efficiency account in rassmotyorennoj to a technique can be subdivided into some groups conditionally. The first group

- These are social the indicators, characterising level a population life, to tayokim to indicators it is possible to carry expected life expectancy at rozhyodenii, a population, a rate of unemployment on the average for a year, relative density of the entered total area of apartment houses in relation to a total area zhiyolishchnogo fund, death rate of the population, real possessed monetary dohoyody the population, a share of children who have remained without care of parents. The second group are the criteria characterising economic development of region, it is possible to carry volume of investments into a fixed capital, a turn-over of production (services) to them, proizyovodimoj small enterprises, volume of tax and not tax incomes konyosolidirovannogo the budget of the subject of the Russian Federation. The third group - includes one criterion

- Estimation the population of activity of enforcement authorities of the subject of Rosyosijsky Federation. A technique described in the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation № 1199, osnoyovyvaetsja in basic on the social indicators, it is possible to judge it because from 11 factors 7 characterise social sphere, that is the technique does an emphasis on development of a standard of living of the population, practically disregarding such vazhyonuju a component of efficiency of public management as economic development of region.

Drawing 26 - the Technique of an estimation of efficiency of the government (the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation from 21.08.2012 №1199 «About an estimation of efficiency of activity of enforcement authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation»)

79

The expanded list of indicators for an efficiency estimation dejatelnoyosti enforcement authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation predstavyolen in the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation from November, 14th, 2017 № 54891.

The list included 24 indicators (Appendix). Are established osobennoyosti applications of some of them. So, the estimation regioyonalnyh bodies is considered by the activity population till August, 1st, 2018 Further will analyze, as the population evaluates conditions for self-realisation, efficiency of activity of the federal authorities, whether the population by services in spheres obrazovayonija, public health services, culture, social service is satisfied. Will consider a share of inhabitants of the region which has faced displays of corruption.

Till January, 1st, 2019 will evaluate dynamics of the real monthly average added salary. Then will consider the relation srednedushevyh denezhyonyh population incomes (minus obligatory payments and payment kommunalyonyh services) to cost of the fixed set of the cores consumer tovayorov and services; factor of availability of housing accommodation; quality and availability of housing and communal services; volume of investments into a fixed capital per capita; density of a network of motorways of the general use meeting standard requests; rezulyotaty an independent estimation of quality of rendering of services by the organisations of social sphere.

As a result of the conducted analysis of techniques of an estimation of efficiency publichyonogo managements we had been improved a technique of an estimation of efficiency «managements by results» in public management which equally considers influence not only the expanded set of social and economic indicators of development of region on efficiency of public management (a proyogrammno-goals management and management by results), but also allows to consider the quantitative public estimation the population received with application of tools of information of public management.

Legal-reference system GARANT.RU [the Electronic resource] an access Mode

http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc

Table 13 - the Author's set of indicators for an efficiency estimation «managements by results» in public management

Indicators The characteristic of an indicator and substantiation of its use in author's metoyodike estimations of efficiency of public management
Social indicators:
Expected life expectancy at a birth, years The major integrated demographic indicator characterising uroyoven death rates of the population. The increase in the given indicator testifies to increase of a standard of living of the population.
Population, the people One of the major indicators evaluating quality state poliyotiki in region. Reduction of the given indicator negatively characterises upravyolencheskuju a policy in region as its reduction is influenced or the high death rate, connected in most cases with a low standard of living, or by migratory outflow for region limits, that also speaks about a low standard of living.
Volume of employment on the average for a year, thousand people The indicator can be carried, as well as in social, and in economic pokazateyoli. Its reduction speaks about reduction of quality of a life and reflects neblagoyoprijatnuju an economic situation in region, after all reduction of number of workers, speaks about curtailment of production.
Real possessed deyonezhnye incomes of the population, % Reflects buying power of the monetary income and also characterises a standard of living of the population of region.
It is caught and neutralised zayogrjaznjajushchih atmosphere veyoshchestv, in % from the general kolicheyostva departing polluting substances Characterises level of ecological safety of region, hence, hayorakterizuet quality of a life of the population.
Number of the students receiving an average professional and higher education, the people Reflects level of availability of formation for the population. The professional and formed shots-it the lien of development of region.
Economic indicators
Gross regional product per capita, rbl. The indicator reflects an aggregate cost of the final goods and services in the current prices created in economic territory of region for the certain period. It is often applied to definition of rates of economic growth, napravleyony and spheres of use of resources, incomes and a population standard of living, proizvoyoditelnosti work and other, hence, the given indicator it is possible ispolzoyovat for an estimation of efficiency of activity of bodies of public management.
Volume of investments into a fixed capital, thousand rbl. Represents investments of capital on a long-term basis on purpose priobreyotenija profits. Dynamics of the given indicator defines level development ekoyonomiki region.
Volume tax and nenalogoyovyh incomes konsolidirovanyonogo the budget, thousand rbl. The size of the given indicator reflects degree of a management efficiency the tax of tax and not tax incomes which in turn allows to do vyyovody about competence or about incompetence of concrete state managers.
The foreign trade turnover, million US dollars Indicator of development of the foreign trade relations. One of the major problems of state bodies is formation stable otnoyosheny with other states, the given indicator shows result of these relations.
Index industrial proiz - vodtsva, % One of the basic macroeconomic indicators characterising dynamics of industrial output, its lifting or recession.
Public estimation of the government
Estimation the population dejatelnoyosti enforcement authorities, % The indicator is value judgment of activity of government bodies. The opinion of the population is important, as public company and state interaction means managements, and the estimation the population of activity of the authorities is an example of a feedback which is the lien of successful interaction.
Share of the citizens who have accepted uchayostie in interrogation about quality dejayotelnosti of government bodies, in the general number of voters, % Quantity of the citizens who have participated in interrogation important on several prichiyonam. First, it allows to evaluate results, poluyochennye as a result of interrogation, the more sample, the more precisely and more really rezulyotata are how much authentic. Secondly, as it has already been told, public management should osnovyyovatsja on interaction, and the given indicator shows level of interest to the government and to interaction with it. Public upravleyonie should carry out actions which will increase interest of company to proyoblemam region, and to evaluate efficiency of these actions the given indicator will allow.

Efficiency of public management is one of the major hayorakteristik qualities of system from the point of view of a parity of expenses and results of functioning of system. The choice of mathematical criteria of an estimation effektivyonosti systems of public management, according to Sazonova S.P., assumes drawing up of the mathematical description of activity of system and definition numerical or the cost indexes characterising its work [92].

During the carried out research by us it has been made kvalimetricheskaja model of an estimation of efficiency «managements by results» in public upravyolenii, assuming construction of the equations of summary indexes for indicators «managements by results», united in three integrated groups, and also account of an integrated indicator of efficiency «managements by results» in public management with a finding of weight factors entering in soyostav summary indexes.

For an estimation of efficiency of public management we offer rasschiyotat growth rates of indicators of each block to previous year, then to find a summary index on each group of indicators, having taken advantage of the following formula:

Where Zp - significance of growth rate of an indicator;

k - The weight of an indicator reflecting its importance in the group.

To define weight factors of indicators for each group, we will take advantage of a matrix of pair comparisons (more precisely updating on T.Saati), consisting in paired comparison of studied factors among themselves in relation to their weight on a general characteristic [93].

We had been calculated weight of each indicator on each integrated grupyope. For six indicators of the social block by the expert it has been by conducted

36 paired comparisons for definition of a measure of the superiority the friend over the friend.

The received comparisons are presented in table 14.

Table 14 - the Matrix of pair comparisons of indicators of the social block

Indicators С1 С2 С3 С4 С5 С6 The sum ∑
С1 1 4 1/2 1/2 1/2 4 10,5
С2 1/4 1 1/3 1/4 1/4 2 4,08
С3 2 3 1 2 2 4 14
С4 2 4 1/2 1 1/2 3 11
С5 2 4 1/2 2 1 3 12,5
С6 1/4 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/3 1 2,66
The sum ∑ 7,5 16,5 3,08 6,08 4,58 17 54,74

*Составлено the author by results of research

Further the vector of priorities by division of elements of each column of a matrix into the sum of elements, i.e. normalizivali a column has been calculated, then the sum of elements of each received line has been divided into number of elements in stro - ke [94]. As a result of the conducted accounts the vector of priorities pokazayotelej social group has been received: С1 = 0,161, С2 = 0,069, С3 = 0,296, С4 =0,187, С5=0,232, С6=0,055.

After account of vectors we had been found indicators of a coordination of a matrix of pair comparisons (table 15).

Table 15 - Account of indicators of a coordination of a matrix of steam rooms

Comparisons of indicators of the social block

Indicator Settlement significance
χmax 6,393
IS 0,0786
SI 1,24
OS 0,063

*Составлено the author by results of research

Significance of OS = 0,063

<< | >>
A source: Grigoryan Arcady Robertovich. INKORPORIROVANIE TOOLS «MANAGEMENTS BY RESULTS» In SYSTEM of PUBLIC MANAGEMENT. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Econ.Sci. Kursk - 2018. 2018

More on topic methodical approaches to an efficiency estimation «managements by results» in public management:

  1. CHAPTER 2. METHODICAL APPROACHES TO THE ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENCY OF DESIGN MANAGEMENT IN REGION
  2. METHODS AND TOOLS «MANAGEMENTS BY RESULTS» IN SYSTEM OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
  3. 2.2. Methodical approaches to an estimation of efficiency of investments vsotsialnuju sphere
  4. 3.1. The comparative analysis of a management efficiency by results in public management at regional level
  5. Research of methodical aspects of an estimation of efficiency sisteyomy public health services
  6. an estimation of efficiency of performance of purpose-oriented programmes at regional level of public management
  7. Grigoryan Arcady Robertovich. INKORPORIROVANIE TOOLS «MANAGEMENTS BY RESULTS» In SYSTEM of PUBLIC MANAGEMENT. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Econ.Sci. Kursk - 2018, 2018
  8. Komparativnyj the analysis of methodical approaches to an estimation of design activity in region
  9. an estimation of efficiency of strategy of development sotsialnoyokulturnoj sphere of regional level on the basis of the mechanism proektyonogo managements
  10. 2.3. Methodical bases of an estimation of efficiency of financing of the enterprises of motor transport of the general use
  11. 2.3 Development of methodical approaches to a potential estimation klasterizatsii regional agriculture
  12. Methodical approaches to formation and management of chains of creation of value at integration of university into an alliance
  13. a management efficiency Estimation.
  14. § 3.1. Features of approaches of an estimation of business at realisation of methods of merges/absorption and methodical recommendations about their perfection
  15. recommendations about perfection of public management at regional level on the basis of information of procedures of management by results (on an example of Kursk area)
  16. 1.3. The analysis of theoretical and methodical approaches to working out of problems of assets management of not state pension funds
  17. METHODICAL APPROACHES TO THE ESTIMATION OF THE CONDITION OF REPRODUCTION OF BRANCHES (FOREIGN TRADE ACTIVITIES) OF ECONOMY OF REGION
  18. PERFECTION OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION OF PROCEDURES OF MANAGEMENT BY RESULTS
  19. the chapter the Second. Methodical bases of an estimation of regional efficiency of direct investments
  20. METHODICAL RECEPTIONS OF MANAGEMENT BY DEVELOPMENT REGIOYONALNOJ OF SYSTEM OF PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES