<<
>>

the Technique of diagnostics of communicative installation on V.V. Bojko (definition of the general communicative tolerance)

(Practical psychodiagnostics: Techniques and tests: the manual / red. - sost. Rajgorodsky D. I - Samara: BAHRAH, 1998. - 672 with.)

The INSTRUCTION: possibility to make digression to variety of human relations is represented to you.

With that end in view you are offered to estimate in nine offered simple situations of interaction with other people. Remember that at the answer the first reaction and that there are no bad or good answers is important. To answer it is necessary, long not deliberating, without admissions.

Check up itself: how much you are capable to accept or not to accept individualities of people meeting to us. Judgements are more low resulted; take advantage of estimations from 0 to 3 points to express, they are however true under the relation personally to you:

0 points - are absolutely incorrect,

1 - it is true somewhat (slightly)

2 - truly substantially (considerably)

3 - truly extremely (very strongly)

Points
1 Sluggish people usually irritate me
2 I am am irritated with fussy, restless people
3 Noisy children's games I transfer hardly
4 Original, non-standard, outstanding personalities usually operate on me negatively
5 Faultless in every respect the person would guard me
IN TOTAL
Check up itself: whether there is no at you a tendency to estimate people, proceeding from own J.Meru


The consent with judgements, as well as in the previous case, express in points from 0 to 3.
Points
1 I am am discomposed usually by the slow interlocutor
2 I am am irritated with fans to talk
3 I would be weighed upon conversation with the indifferent fellow traveller for me in a train, the plane if it shows the initiative.
4 I would be weighed upon conversations of the casual fellow traveller which concedes to me on level of knowledge and cultures.
5 It is difficult to me to find common language with partners of other intellectual level, than at me.
IN TOTAL


Check up itself: in what measure your estimations in окру address are categorical or invariable

zhajushchih.
Points
1 The modern youth causes unpleasant feelings the appearance (a hairdress, cosmetics, dresses)
2 So-called «new Russian» usually make unpleasant impression or lack of culture, or greed
3 Representatives of some nationalities in my environment are frankly not nice to me
4 There is a type of men (women) which I do not take out.
5 I hate business partners with low professional level.
IN TOTAL

Check up itself: in what degree you are able to hide or smooth unpleasant impressions at collision with uncommunicative qualities of people (degree of the consent with judgements estimate from 0 to 3 points):


Points
1 I consider, that it is necessary to answer roughness to the same
2 It is difficult to me to hide, if the person something is unpleasant
3 I am am irritated with the people aspiring in dispute to insist on
4 Self-confident people are unpleasant to me
5 It is usually difficult to me to be kept from the remark to the embittered or nervous person who is pushed in transport


Check up itself: whether there is at you a propensity to alter and re-educate the partner

(An estimation of judgements from 0 to 3 points):
Points
1 I am accustomed to teach associates
2 Ill-bred people revolt me
3 I often catch myself that I try to bring up someone
4 I on a habit constantly do to someone remarks
5 I like to order relatives
IN TOTAL

Check up itself: in what degree you are inclined to adjust partners to yourselves, to do them


Convenient (an estimation of judgements from 0 to 3 points):
Points
1 I am am irritated with old men when they in a rush hour appear in a municipal transportation or in shops
2 To live in number of hotel with the extraneous person for me simply torture
3 When the partner disagrees in something with my correct position usually it irritates me
4 I show impatience when to me object
5 Me irritates, if the partner does something on the, not as I would like that
IN TOTAL


Check up itself: whether such tendency of behaviour (an estimation of judgements from 0 is peculiar to you

To 3 points):
Points
1 Usually I hope, that to my offenders will get on merits
2 Me often reproach with peevishness
3 I long remember the insults put to me those whom I appreciate or I respect
4 It is impossible to forgive to colleagues tactless jokes
5 If the business partner inadvertently wounds my self-esteem I nevertheless will take offence at it
IN TOTAL


Check up itself: in what degree you are tolerant to discomfortable conditions of associates (an estimation of judgements from 0 to 3 points):
Points
1 I condemn people who are cried in another's vest
2 Internally I do not approve colleagues (friends) who at an opportunity tell about the illnesses
3 I try to leave from conversation when somebody starts to complain of the home life
4 Usually I without special attention listen to confessions of friends (girlfriends)
5 I sometimes like to tease somebody from native and friends
IN TOTAL



Check up itself: what your adaptable abilities in interaction with ljud

mi (an estimation of judgements from 0 to 3 points):
Points
1 It is usually difficult to me to make concessions to partners
2 It is difficult to me to get on with people, at which bad character
3 Usually I hardly adapt to new partners in teamwork
4 I abstain to keep in touch with a little strange people
5 Usually I from a principle insist on the even if I understand, that the partner of the rights.
IN TOTAL


Processing and interpretation of data.

So, you have familiarised with some behavioural signs testifying to low level of the general communicative tolerance.

Count up a score, received by you to all signs, and draw a conclusion: the more points, the more low level of communicative tolerance. The maximum number of points which can be earned, - 135, this indicator testifies to absolute intolerance to associates that is hardly possible for the normal person. In the same way improbably to receive a zero of points - the certificate of tolerance to all types of partners in all situations.

Compare the data with resulted and draw a conclusion on the communicative tolerance.

Pay attention to on what from 9 offered above behavioural signs high total estimations are received - the interval from 0 to 15 points here is possible; the more points to a concrete sign, the less the respondent is tolerant to people in the given aspect of relations with them. On the contrary, the less received result to this or that behavioural sign, the above level of the general communicative tolerance on the given aspect of relations with partners. Certainly, the obtained data allow to notice only the basic tendencies peculiar to your interactions with partners. In direct, live dialogue the person is shown more brightly and is more diverse.

<< | >>
A source: Makarova Elena Leonidovna. FORMATION of the COMPETENCE of CORPORATE DIALOGUE of the EXPERT of SREDSTVAMIINFORMATSIONNO-COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES.

More on topic the Technique of diagnostics of communicative installation on V.V. Bojko (definition of the general communicative tolerance):

  1. concept of communicative behaviour and the communicative person of modern linguistics
  2. 2.3.1. Concepts «communicative strategy» and «communicative tactics» in the scientific literature
  3. the REVEALING TECHNIQUE of "COMMUNICATIVE And ORGANIZING PROPENSITIES» (PLAITS - 2) Author E.J.Brunner
  4. 1.2.3 Communicative and temporalnye perception factors Communicative factors of perception of the political leader
  5. 3.3.1 Communicative courses
  6. a communicative component
  7. 1.3. Model of an uchebno-pedagogical communicative situation
  8. communicative behaviour of the addressee
  9. the communicative purpose
  10. communicative behaviour of the blackmailer
  11. 1.2.4. Communicative style of the professional language person
  12. concepts of types of the communicative person
  13. communicative tactics and strategy
  14. Communicative competence of a moderator of an Internet forum
  15. communicative the PR-discourse competence