# the Appendix 2

Statistical processing of results of the test-questionnaire by definition of level of a self-estimation of the future officers with criterion application χr2Фридмана

Criterion χr2применяется for comparison of the indicators measured in three or more conditions on the same sample of examinees.

The criterion allows to establish, that sizes of indicators from a condition to a condition change not in a random way.

Technique of calculation of criterion χr2Фридмана

1. To range the individual values of the first cadet received by it in 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc. gaugings and same to all another

2. To summarise ranks on conditions to which gaugings were spent.

3. To check up cовпадение the general cуммы ranks with раcчетной the sum.

4. The settlement total sum of ranks in criterion is defined under the formula:

- c ' (with + 1)

(2)

У2

Where n - quantity of examinees,

With - quantity of conditions of measurement (gaugings).

To define empirical value χr2по to the formula:

χ2 -

/V ry ιι

12

n ■ c ■ (с+1)

∙Σ (tj)

-3 ■ n ■ (с+1),

(3)

Where with - quantity of conditions,

n - quantity of examinees,

Tj - the sums of ranks on each of conditions.

5. Critical values of criterion χr23M ∏ for levels statistical znachimostir ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 under table 21 were defined.

Table 21

Critical values of criterion χI2эM∏для levels of the statistical importance r ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 at different number of degrees of freedom

 P P P V 0,05 0,01 V 0,05 0,01 V 0,05 0,01 1 3,841 6,635 35 49,802 57,342 69 89,391 99,227 2 5,991 9,210 36 50,998 58,619 70 90,631 100,425 3 7,815 11,345 37 52,192 59,892 71 91,670 101,621 4 9,488 13,277 38 53,384 61,162 72 92,808 102,816 5 11,070 15,086 39 54,572 62,428 73 93,945 104,010 6 12,592 16,812 40 55,758 63,691 74 95,081 105,202 7 14,067 18,475 41 56,942 64,950 75 96,217 106,393 8 15,507 20,090 42 58,124 66,206 76 97,351 107,582 9 16,919 21,666 43 59,304 67,459 77 98,484 108,771 10 18,307 23,209 44 60,481 68,709 78 99,617 109,958 AND 19,675 24,725 45 61,656 69,957 79 100,749 111,144 12 21,026 26,217 46 62,830 71,201 80 101,879 112,329 13 22,362 27,688 47 64,001 72,443 81 103,010 113,512 14 23,685 29,141 48 65,171 73,683 82 104,139 114,695 15 24,996 30,578 49 66,339 74,919 83 105,267 115,876 16 26,296 32,000 50 67,505 76,154 84 106,395 117,057 17 27,587 33,409 51 68,669 77,386 85 107,522 118,236 18 28,869 34,805 52 69,832 78,616 §6 108,648 119,414 19 30,144 36,191 53 70,993 79,843 87 109,773 120,591 20 31,410 37,566 54 72,153 81,069 88 110,898 121,767 21 32,671 38,932 55 73,311 82,292 89 112,022 122,942 22 33,924 40,289 56 74,468 83,513 90 113,145 124,116 23 35,172 41,638 57 75,624 84,733 91 114,268 125,289 24 36,415 42,980 58 76,778 85,950 92 115,390 126,462 25 37,652 44,314 59 77,931 87,166 93 116,511 127,633 26 38,885 45,642 60 79,082 88,379 94 117,632 128,803 27 40,113 46,963 61 80,232 89,591 95 118,752 129,973 28 41,337 48,278 62 81,381 90,802 96 119,871 131,141 29 42,557 49,588 63 82,529 92,010 97 120,990 132,309 30 43,773 50,892 64 83,675 93,217 98 122,108 133,476 31 44,985 52,191 65 84,821 94,422 99 123,225 134,642 32 46,194 53,486 66 85,965 95,626 100 124,342 135,807 33 47,400 54,776 67 87,108 96,828 34 48,602 56,061 68 88,250 98,028

For statistical processing of results of the test-questionnaire by definition of level of a self-estimation of the future officers with criterion application χr2Фридмана data of cadets of KG and EG in 3-4, 7-8, 9 semestre have been chosen.

Surnames of cadets were defined, how To 1, To 2, To 3 - To 21.

Conditions were scales-indicators: self-esteem, autosimpatii and expectations of the positive relation.

1. In table 22-24 the individual values of cadets received by them in 1st, 2nd, 3rd gaugings (in 3-4 educational semestre) were ranged.

Table 22

In 3-4 educational semestre

 N p/p N the cadet Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank j S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ Rank Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank j S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ Rank 1. TO 1 63.4 3 57.1 1 62.0 2 66.3 3 61.1 1 68.2 2 2. TO 2 62.1 2 59.1 1 63.1 3 68.3 3 62.5 1 68.8 2 3. TO 3 65.1 3 61.9 1 63.2 2 64.5 2 60.3 1 67.1 3 4. TO 4 64.1 3 60.4 1 61.5 2 68.8 3 59.2 1 68.9 2 5. TO 5 65.1 3 58.8 1 64.2 2 67.2 3 62.1 1 67.0 2 6. TO 6 67.2 2 57.4 1 67.5 3 66.4 3 63.4 1 68.5 2 7. TO 7 63.0 2 58.7 1 64.2 3 68.2 3 62.7 1 66.5 2 8. TO 8 62.5 2 60.3 1 60.5 3 68.1 3 59.4 1 67.0 2 9. TO 9 65.2 3 59.7 1 63.3 2 67.5 3 59.8 1 68.2 2 10. TO 10 63.4 3 58.0 1 62.4 2 69.1 3 62.1 1 69.1 2 11 TO 11 62.3 2 57.4 1 63.0 3 68.3 3 62.4 1 67.4 2 12 TO 12 64.1 3 56.3 1 61.1 2 69.4 3 63.0 1 68.2 2 13 TO 13 64.7 3 55.9 1 60.7 2 69.7 3 61.7 1 67.9 2 14 TO 14 62.1 3 56.4 1 61.5 2 68.8 3 61.4 1 68.1 2 15 TO 15 63.2 3 57.3 1 62.2 2 70.2 3 63.1 1 69.2 2 16 TO 16 64.1 3 57.1 1 63.4 2 69.5 3 62.9 1 68.4 2 17 TO 17 62.7 2 57.2 1 62.9 3 70.4 3 61.4 1 67.5 2 18 TO 18 65.2 3 56.4 1 62.0 2 70.0 3 58.7 1 67.6 2 19 TO 19 61.7 3 55.2 1 61.1 2 69.9 3 61.9 1 68.1 2 20 TO 20 62.9 3 57.4 1 62.4 2 68.3 2 62.8 1 69.4 3 21 TO 21 61.5 3 56.7 1 61.3 2 68.5 2 62.7 1 69.7 3 The sum of ranks 57 21 48 60 21 45 Control group Experimental group

Ranging of individual values of the cadets, received by them in 7-8 educational semestre

 N p/p N the cadet Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank j S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ Rank Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank J S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ Rank 1. TO 1 76.7 2 75.1 1 82.1 3 81.1 1 81.4 2 89.7 3 2. TO 2 77.5 2 75.2 1 82.6 3 78.8 1 80.5 2 88.3 3 3. TO 3 75.5 2 74.1 1 83.9 3 78.6 1 79.1 2 85.1 3 4. TO 4 78.6 2 76.3 1 83.4 3 79.1 2 77.8 1 88.6 3 5. TO 5 77.3 2 74.1 1 83.1 3 79.2 1 80.0 2 89.1 3 6. TO 6 76.2 2 74.7 1 82.1 3 78.8 1 80.9 2 87.4 3 7. TO 7 76.1 2 74.3 1 83.5 3 79.2 1 79.5 2 87.8 3 8. TO 8 76.6 2 75.4 1 82.4 3 80.1 1 81.2 2 86.4 3 9. TO 9 77.2 2 75.1 1 81.9 3 77.9 1 79.6 2 89.7 3 10 TO 10 77.1 2 75.0 1 80.9 3 81.2 1 82.1 2 88.4 3 11 TO 11 76.4 2 73.9 1 81.3 3 81.4 2 81.3 1 90.1 3 12 TO 12 77.2 2 73.8 1 82.4 3 82.0 1 82.3 2 90.7 3 13 TO 13 75.5 2 74.2 1 83.1 3 80.4 1 81.7 2 88.5 3 14 TO 14 75.4 2 73.8 1 82.4 3 80.1 1 82.7 2 89.1 3 15 TO 15 76.8 2 73.7 1 82.5 3 79.3 1 81.4 2 89.4 3 16 TO 16 75.1 2 74.1 1 80.9 3 81.1 2 80.8 1 90.4 3 17 TO 17 77.4 2 74.6 1 81.4 3 80.7 1 83.1 2 90.5 3 18 TO 18 77.2 2 74.8 1 81.1 3 79.2 1 92.9 2 91.4 3 19 TO 19 75.3 2 74.3 1 83.2 3 80.0 1 83.4 2 89.5 3 20 TO 20 75.8 2 73.8 1 82.2 3 81.2 1 83.6 2 89.0 3 21 TO 21 75.2 2 73.5 1 81.9 3 80.3 1 82.7 2 90.3 3 The sum of ranks 42 21 63 24 39 63 Control group Experimental group

Table 24

Ranging of individual values of the cadets, received by them in 9 educational semestre

 N p/p N the cadet Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank J S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ Rank Self-esteem Rank Autosimpatija Rank J S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ Rank 1. TO 1 79.1 1 86.1 2 88.1 3 89.1 1 94.6 2 96.7 3 2. TO 2 81.4 1 85.2 2 88.6 3 88.8 1 95.8 2 96.3 3 3. TO 3 80.3 1 87.1 2 88.9 3 88.6 1 97.1 3 95.1 2 4. TO 4 80.2 1 87.3 2 88.4 3 89.1 1 97.8 2 98.6 3 5. TO 5 81.5 1 86.7 2 89.1 3 89.2 1 96.2 3 96.1 2 6. TO 6 81.9 1 88.1 3 86.4 2 88.8 1 96.4 2 96.4 3 7. TO 7 81.4 1 86.9 2 88.5 3 89.2 1 95.5 2 97.8 3 8. TO 8 78.3 1 87.8 2 88.4 3 89.1 1 94.3 2 97.9 3 9. TO 9 79.1 1 87.4 2 87.9 3 87.9 1 97.2 3 96.6 2 10 TO 10 80.3 1 86.5 2 86.9 3 89.1 1 96.4 2 97.2 3 11 TO 11 81.4 1 87.4 2 88.7 3 90.2 1 97.0 2 97.7 3 12 TO 12 82.0 1 87.2 2 87.3 3 90.4 1 96.8 2 97.1 3 13 TO 13 79.5 1 88.1 3 87.4 2 89.4 1 95.5 2 99.2 3 14 TO 14 79.4 1 87.3 2 88.5 3 89.2 1 95.4 2 98.4 3 15 TO 15 80.5 1 87.4 2 88.9 3 90.3 1 96.8 2 97.9 3 16 TO 16 81.4 1 87.6 2 89.4 3 89.4 1 97.3 2 97.5 3 17 TO 17 82.2 1 89.0 3 86.5 2 88.3 1 94.8 2 97.4 3 18 TO 18 80.9 1 88.3 3 86.9 2 91.1 1 95.7 2 97.3 3 19 TO 19 80.3 1 87.2 2 88.1 3 90.4 1 96.1 2 96.9 3 20 TO 20 80.7 1 86.1 2 87.2 3 88.2 1 97.9 3 96.0 2 21 TO 21 81.4 1 87.2 2 87.3 3 88.7 1 94.5 2 97.4 3 The sum of ranks 21 46 59 21 45 60 Control group Experimental group

2. In KG and EG cadets ranks on conditions, in which were summarised

Gaugings were spent.

Coincidence of a total sum of ranks to the settlement sum was checked.

The settlement total sum of ranks in criterion was defined:

Where n - quantity of examinees,

With - quantity of conditions of measurement (gaugings).

207

Where with - quantity of conditions,

n - quantity of examinees,

Tj - the sums of ranks on each of conditions.

The quantity of degrees of freedom was defined under the formula υ = n - 1

4. Critical values of criterion χr23M ∏ for levels statistical znachimostir ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 under the table were defined. 21 (IX).

Distinctions between two distributions can be considered

2 2 2

Authentic if χr empdostigaet or exceeds χr 0.05, χr 0.01.

The received results are reflected in table 24.

Table 25 Levels of the statistical importance for χr2эм

Conclusion: from table 24 it is visible, that and EG (in 3-4, 7-8, 9 semestre) it is possible to consider the received values of KG authentic (not casual) as χr2эм ∏ KG and EG reached or exceeded critical values χr20.05, χr20.01.