the Appendix 2
Statistical processing of results of the test-questionnaire by definition of level of a self-estimation of the future officers with criterion application χr2Фридмана
Criterion χr2применяется for comparison of the indicators measured in three or more conditions on the same sample of examinees.
The criterion allows to establish, that sizes of indicators from a condition to a condition change not in a random way.
Technique of calculation of criterion χr2Фридмана
1. To range the individual values of the first cadet received by it in 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc. gaugings and same to all another
To cadets.
2. To summarise ranks on conditions to which gaugings were spent.
3. To check up cовпадение the general cуммы ranks with раcчетной the sum.
4. The settlement total sum of ranks in criterion is defined under the formula:
- c ' (with + 1)
(2)
У2
Where n - quantity of examinees,
With - quantity of conditions of measurement (gaugings).
To define empirical value χr2по to the formula:
χ2 -
/V ry ιι
12
n ■ c ■ (с+1)
∙Σ (tj)
-3 ■ n ■ (с+1),
(3)
Where with - quantity of conditions,
n - quantity of examinees,
Tj - the sums of ranks on each of conditions.
5. Critical values of criterion χr23M ∏ for levels statistical znachimostir ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 under table 21 were defined.
Table 21
Critical values of criterion χI2эM∏для levels of the statistical importance r ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 at different number of degrees of freedom
P | P | P | ||||||
V | 0,05 | 0,01 | V | 0,05 | 0,01 | V | 0,05 | 0,01 |
1 | 3,841 | 6,635 | 35 | 49,802 | 57,342 | 69 | 89,391 | 99,227 |
2 | 5,991 | 9,210 | 36 | 50,998 | 58,619 | 70 | 90,631 | 100,425 |
3 | 7,815 | 11,345 | 37 | 52,192 | 59,892 | 71 | 91,670 | 101,621 |
4 | 9,488 | 13,277 | 38 | 53,384 | 61,162 | 72 | 92,808 | 102,816 |
5 | 11,070 | 15,086 | 39 | 54,572 | 62,428 | 73 | 93,945 | 104,010 |
6 | 12,592 | 16,812 | 40 | 55,758 | 63,691 | 74 | 95,081 | 105,202 |
7 | 14,067 | 18,475 | 41 | 56,942 | 64,950 | 75 | 96,217 | 106,393 |
8 | 15,507 | 20,090 | 42 | 58,124 | 66,206 | 76 | 97,351 | 107,582 |
9 | 16,919 | 21,666 | 43 | 59,304 | 67,459 | 77 | 98,484 | 108,771 |
10 | 18,307 | 23,209 | 44 | 60,481 | 68,709 | 78 | 99,617 | 109,958 |
AND | 19,675 | 24,725 | 45 | 61,656 | 69,957 | 79 | 100,749 | 111,144 |
12 | 21,026 | 26,217 | 46 | 62,830 | 71,201 | 80 | 101,879 | 112,329 |
13 | 22,362 | 27,688 | 47 | 64,001 | 72,443 | 81 | 103,010 | 113,512 |
14 | 23,685 | 29,141 | 48 | 65,171 | 73,683 | 82 | 104,139 | 114,695 |
15 | 24,996 | 30,578 | 49 | 66,339 | 74,919 | 83 | 105,267 | 115,876 |
16 | 26,296 | 32,000 | 50 | 67,505 | 76,154 | 84 | 106,395 | 117,057 |
17 | 27,587 | 33,409 | 51 | 68,669 | 77,386 | 85 | 107,522 | 118,236 |
18 | 28,869 | 34,805 | 52 | 69,832 | 78,616 | §6 | 108,648 | 119,414 |
19 | 30,144 | 36,191 | 53 | 70,993 | 79,843 | 87 | 109,773 | 120,591 |
20 | 31,410 | 37,566 | 54 | 72,153 | 81,069 | 88 | 110,898 | 121,767 |
21 | 32,671 | 38,932 | 55 | 73,311 | 82,292 | 89 | 112,022 | 122,942 |
22 | 33,924 | 40,289 | 56 | 74,468 | 83,513 | 90 | 113,145 | 124,116 |
23 | 35,172 | 41,638 | 57 | 75,624 | 84,733 | 91 | 114,268 | 125,289 |
24 | 36,415 | 42,980 | 58 | 76,778 | 85,950 | 92 | 115,390 | 126,462 |
25 | 37,652 | 44,314 | 59 | 77,931 | 87,166 | 93 | 116,511 | 127,633 |
26 | 38,885 | 45,642 | 60 | 79,082 | 88,379 | 94 | 117,632 | 128,803 |
27 | 40,113 | 46,963 | 61 | 80,232 | 89,591 | 95 | 118,752 | 129,973 |
28 | 41,337 | 48,278 | 62 | 81,381 | 90,802 | 96 | 119,871 | 131,141 |
29 | 42,557 | 49,588 | 63 | 82,529 | 92,010 | 97 | 120,990 | 132,309 |
30 | 43,773 | 50,892 | 64 | 83,675 | 93,217 | 98 | 122,108 | 133,476 |
31 | 44,985 | 52,191 | 65 | 84,821 | 94,422 | 99 | 123,225 | 134,642 |
32 | 46,194 | 53,486 | 66 | 85,965 | 95,626 | 100 | 124,342 | 135,807 |
33 | 47,400 | 54,776 | 67 | 87,108 | 96,828 | |||
34 | 48,602 | 56,061 | 68 | 88,250 | 98,028 |
For statistical processing of results of the test-questionnaire by definition of level of a self-estimation of the future officers with criterion application χr2Фридмана data of cadets of KG and EG in 3-4, 7-8, 9 semestre have been chosen.
Surnames of cadets were defined, how To 1, To 2, To 3 - To 21.
Conditions were scales-indicators: self-esteem, autosimpatii and expectations of the positive relation.
1. In table 22-24 the individual values of cadets received by them in 1st, 2nd, 3rd gaugings (in 3-4 educational semestre) were ranged.
Table 22
Ranging of individual values of the cadets, received by them
In 3-4 educational semestre
N p/p | N the cadet | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | j S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ | Rank | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | j S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ | Rank |
1. | TO 1 | 63.4 | 3 | 57.1 | 1 | 62.0 | 2 | 66.3 | 3 | 61.1 | 1 | 68.2 | 2 |
2. | TO 2 | 62.1 | 2 | 59.1 | 1 | 63.1 | 3 | 68.3 | 3 | 62.5 | 1 | 68.8 | 2 |
3. | TO 3 | 65.1 | 3 | 61.9 | 1 | 63.2 | 2 | 64.5 | 2 | 60.3 | 1 | 67.1 | 3 |
4. | TO 4 | 64.1 | 3 | 60.4 | 1 | 61.5 | 2 | 68.8 | 3 | 59.2 | 1 | 68.9 | 2 |
5. | TO 5 | 65.1 | 3 | 58.8 | 1 | 64.2 | 2 | 67.2 | 3 | 62.1 | 1 | 67.0 | 2 |
6. | TO 6 | 67.2 | 2 | 57.4 | 1 | 67.5 | 3 | 66.4 | 3 | 63.4 | 1 | 68.5 | 2 |
7. | TO 7 | 63.0 | 2 | 58.7 | 1 | 64.2 | 3 | 68.2 | 3 | 62.7 | 1 | 66.5 | 2 |
8. | TO 8 | 62.5 | 2 | 60.3 | 1 | 60.5 | 3 | 68.1 | 3 | 59.4 | 1 | 67.0 | 2 |
9. | TO 9 | 65.2 | 3 | 59.7 | 1 | 63.3 | 2 | 67.5 | 3 | 59.8 | 1 | 68.2 | 2 |
10. | TO 10 | 63.4 | 3 | 58.0 | 1 | 62.4 | 2 | 69.1 | 3 | 62.1 | 1 | 69.1 | 2 |
11 | TO 11 | 62.3 | 2 | 57.4 | 1 | 63.0 | 3 | 68.3 | 3 | 62.4 | 1 | 67.4 | 2 |
12 | TO 12 | 64.1 | 3 | 56.3 | 1 | 61.1 | 2 | 69.4 | 3 | 63.0 | 1 | 68.2 | 2 |
13 | TO 13 | 64.7 | 3 | 55.9 | 1 | 60.7 | 2 | 69.7 | 3 | 61.7 | 1 | 67.9 | 2 |
14 | TO 14 | 62.1 | 3 | 56.4 | 1 | 61.5 | 2 | 68.8 | 3 | 61.4 | 1 | 68.1 | 2 |
15 | TO 15 | 63.2 | 3 | 57.3 | 1 | 62.2 | 2 | 70.2 | 3 | 63.1 | 1 | 69.2 | 2 |
16 | TO 16 | 64.1 | 3 | 57.1 | 1 | 63.4 | 2 | 69.5 | 3 | 62.9 | 1 | 68.4 | 2 |
17 | TO 17 | 62.7 | 2 | 57.2 | 1 | 62.9 | 3 | 70.4 | 3 | 61.4 | 1 | 67.5 | 2 |
18 | TO 18 | 65.2 | 3 | 56.4 | 1 | 62.0 | 2 | 70.0 | 3 | 58.7 | 1 | 67.6 | 2 |
19 | TO 19 | 61.7 | 3 | 55.2 | 1 | 61.1 | 2 | 69.9 | 3 | 61.9 | 1 | 68.1 | 2 |
20 | TO 20 | 62.9 | 3 | 57.4 | 1 | 62.4 | 2 | 68.3 | 2 | 62.8 | 1 | 69.4 | 3 |
21 | TO 21 | 61.5 | 3 | 56.7 | 1 | 61.3 | 2 | 68.5 | 2 | 62.7 | 1 | 69.7 | 3 |
The sum of ranks | 57 | 21 | 48 | 60 | 21 | 45 | |||||||
Control group | Experimental group |
Ranging of individual values of the cadets, received by them in 7-8 educational semestre
N p/p | N the cadet | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | j S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ | Rank | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | J S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ | Rank |
1. | TO 1 | 76.7 | 2 | 75.1 | 1 | 82.1 | 3 | 81.1 | 1 | 81.4 | 2 | 89.7 | 3 |
2. | TO 2 | 77.5 | 2 | 75.2 | 1 | 82.6 | 3 | 78.8 | 1 | 80.5 | 2 | 88.3 | 3 |
3. | TO 3 | 75.5 | 2 | 74.1 | 1 | 83.9 | 3 | 78.6 | 1 | 79.1 | 2 | 85.1 | 3 |
4. | TO 4 | 78.6 | 2 | 76.3 | 1 | 83.4 | 3 | 79.1 | 2 | 77.8 | 1 | 88.6 | 3 |
5. | TO 5 | 77.3 | 2 | 74.1 | 1 | 83.1 | 3 | 79.2 | 1 | 80.0 | 2 | 89.1 | 3 |
6. | TO 6 | 76.2 | 2 | 74.7 | 1 | 82.1 | 3 | 78.8 | 1 | 80.9 | 2 | 87.4 | 3 |
7. | TO 7 | 76.1 | 2 | 74.3 | 1 | 83.5 | 3 | 79.2 | 1 | 79.5 | 2 | 87.8 | 3 |
8. | TO 8 | 76.6 | 2 | 75.4 | 1 | 82.4 | 3 | 80.1 | 1 | 81.2 | 2 | 86.4 | 3 |
9. | TO 9 | 77.2 | 2 | 75.1 | 1 | 81.9 | 3 | 77.9 | 1 | 79.6 | 2 | 89.7 | 3 |
10 | TO 10 | 77.1 | 2 | 75.0 | 1 | 80.9 | 3 | 81.2 | 1 | 82.1 | 2 | 88.4 | 3 |
11 | TO 11 | 76.4 | 2 | 73.9 | 1 | 81.3 | 3 | 81.4 | 2 | 81.3 | 1 | 90.1 | 3 |
12 | TO 12 | 77.2 | 2 | 73.8 | 1 | 82.4 | 3 | 82.0 | 1 | 82.3 | 2 | 90.7 | 3 |
13 | TO 13 | 75.5 | 2 | 74.2 | 1 | 83.1 | 3 | 80.4 | 1 | 81.7 | 2 | 88.5 | 3 |
14 | TO 14 | 75.4 | 2 | 73.8 | 1 | 82.4 | 3 | 80.1 | 1 | 82.7 | 2 | 89.1 | 3 |
15 | TO 15 | 76.8 | 2 | 73.7 | 1 | 82.5 | 3 | 79.3 | 1 | 81.4 | 2 | 89.4 | 3 |
16 | TO 16 | 75.1 | 2 | 74.1 | 1 | 80.9 | 3 | 81.1 | 2 | 80.8 | 1 | 90.4 | 3 |
17 | TO 17 | 77.4 | 2 | 74.6 | 1 | 81.4 | 3 | 80.7 | 1 | 83.1 | 2 | 90.5 | 3 |
18 | TO 18 | 77.2 | 2 | 74.8 | 1 | 81.1 | 3 | 79.2 | 1 | 92.9 | 2 | 91.4 | 3 |
19 | TO 19 | 75.3 | 2 | 74.3 | 1 | 83.2 | 3 | 80.0 | 1 | 83.4 | 2 | 89.5 | 3 |
20 | TO 20 | 75.8 | 2 | 73.8 | 1 | 82.2 | 3 | 81.2 | 1 | 83.6 | 2 | 89.0 | 3 |
21 | TO 21 | 75.2 | 2 | 73.5 | 1 | 81.9 | 3 | 80.3 | 1 | 82.7 | 2 | 90.3 | 3 |
The sum of ranks | 42 | 21 | 63 | 24 | 39 | 63 | |||||||
Control group | Experimental group |
Table 24
Ranging of individual values of the cadets, received by them in 9 educational semestre
N p/p | N the cadet | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | J S ≈ S? With and ⅛ S S with ⅛ ABOUT ξ | Rank | Self-esteem | Rank | Autosimpatija | Rank | J S ' in? With and ⅛: S C AND ABOUT ξ | Rank |
1. | TO 1 | 79.1 | 1 | 86.1 | 2 | 88.1 | 3 | 89.1 | 1 | 94.6 | 2 | 96.7 | 3 |
2. | TO 2 | 81.4 | 1 | 85.2 | 2 | 88.6 | 3 | 88.8 | 1 | 95.8 | 2 | 96.3 | 3 |
3. | TO 3 | 80.3 | 1 | 87.1 | 2 | 88.9 | 3 | 88.6 | 1 | 97.1 | 3 | 95.1 | 2 |
4. | TO 4 | 80.2 | 1 | 87.3 | 2 | 88.4 | 3 | 89.1 | 1 | 97.8 | 2 | 98.6 | 3 |
5. | TO 5 | 81.5 | 1 | 86.7 | 2 | 89.1 | 3 | 89.2 | 1 | 96.2 | 3 | 96.1 | 2 |
6. | TO 6 | 81.9 | 1 | 88.1 | 3 | 86.4 | 2 | 88.8 | 1 | 96.4 | 2 | 96.4 | 3 |
7. | TO 7 | 81.4 | 1 | 86.9 | 2 | 88.5 | 3 | 89.2 | 1 | 95.5 | 2 | 97.8 | 3 |
8. | TO 8 | 78.3 | 1 | 87.8 | 2 | 88.4 | 3 | 89.1 | 1 | 94.3 | 2 | 97.9 | 3 |
9. | TO 9 | 79.1 | 1 | 87.4 | 2 | 87.9 | 3 | 87.9 | 1 | 97.2 | 3 | 96.6 | 2 |
10 | TO 10 | 80.3 | 1 | 86.5 | 2 | 86.9 | 3 | 89.1 | 1 | 96.4 | 2 | 97.2 | 3 |
11 | TO 11 | 81.4 | 1 | 87.4 | 2 | 88.7 | 3 | 90.2 | 1 | 97.0 | 2 | 97.7 | 3 |
12 | TO 12 | 82.0 | 1 | 87.2 | 2 | 87.3 | 3 | 90.4 | 1 | 96.8 | 2 | 97.1 | 3 |
13 | TO 13 | 79.5 | 1 | 88.1 | 3 | 87.4 | 2 | 89.4 | 1 | 95.5 | 2 | 99.2 | 3 |
14 | TO 14 | 79.4 | 1 | 87.3 | 2 | 88.5 | 3 | 89.2 | 1 | 95.4 | 2 | 98.4 | 3 |
15 | TO 15 | 80.5 | 1 | 87.4 | 2 | 88.9 | 3 | 90.3 | 1 | 96.8 | 2 | 97.9 | 3 |
16 | TO 16 | 81.4 | 1 | 87.6 | 2 | 89.4 | 3 | 89.4 | 1 | 97.3 | 2 | 97.5 | 3 |
17 | TO 17 | 82.2 | 1 | 89.0 | 3 | 86.5 | 2 | 88.3 | 1 | 94.8 | 2 | 97.4 | 3 |
18 | TO 18 | 80.9 | 1 | 88.3 | 3 | 86.9 | 2 | 91.1 | 1 | 95.7 | 2 | 97.3 | 3 |
19 | TO 19 | 80.3 | 1 | 87.2 | 2 | 88.1 | 3 | 90.4 | 1 | 96.1 | 2 | 96.9 | 3 |
20 | TO 20 | 80.7 | 1 | 86.1 | 2 | 87.2 | 3 | 88.2 | 1 | 97.9 | 3 | 96.0 | 2 |
21 | TO 21 | 81.4 | 1 | 87.2 | 2 | 87.3 | 3 | 88.7 | 1 | 94.5 | 2 | 97.4 | 3 |
The sum of ranks | 21 | 46 | 59 | 21 | 45 | 60 | |||||||
Control group | Experimental group |
2. In KG and EG cadets ranks on conditions, in which were summarised
Gaugings were spent.
Coincidence of a total sum of ranks to the settlement sum was checked.
The settlement total sum of ranks in criterion was defined:
Where n - quantity of examinees,
With - quantity of conditions of measurement (gaugings).
207
Where with - quantity of conditions,
n - quantity of examinees,
Tj - the sums of ranks on each of conditions.
The quantity of degrees of freedom was defined under the formula υ = n - 1
4. Critical values of criterion χr23M ∏ for levels statistical znachimostir ≤ 0.05 ir ≤ 0.01 under the table were defined. 21 (IX).
Distinctions between two distributions can be considered
2 2 2
Authentic if χr empdostigaet or exceeds χr 0.05, χr 0.01.
The received results are reflected in table 24.
Table 25 Levels of the statistical importance for χr2эм ∏
Conclusion: from table 24 it is visible, that and EG (in 3-4, 7-8, 9 semestre) it is possible to consider the received values of KG authentic (not casual) as χr2эм ∏ KG and EG reached or exceeded critical values χr20.05, χr20.01.
More on topic the Appendix 2:
- the Appendix
- the Appendix 4
- the Appendix
- THE APPENDIX
- the Appendix
- THE APPENDIX
- the APPENDIX 4
- the Appendix
- the Appendix
- the Appendix
- the Appendix
- THE APPENDIX
- the Appendix
- THE APPENDIX