Chronological frameworks.

from the historical point of view work covers the period 1901 - 1922 the Opinion of historians on chronology of history of Party of socialists-revolutionaries is not unequivocal. One researchers connect occurrence PSR with occurrence in 1893 of "the s.-river Union╗ in (Bern, Switzerland) 4, the second name 1901 when there was a merge eserovskih the organisations and creation At Parties on a magazine platform źBulletin of Russian revolution╗, are also other point of view - December, 1905 when has taken place About Constituent congress eserov (Imatra, Finland). Though organizational and ideological registration PSR has occupied more than ten years, starting date of history of party eserov in our opinion, followed consider a boundary 1901-1902 Then the formal agreement between representatives Russian and foreign eserovskih the organisations and groups has been entered into, there was a public message on party formation, the first act of terrorism has taken place, responsibility for which was incurred by socialists-revolutionaries. There is no unity of opinions and concerning a concluding period of Party of socialists-revolutionaries. The majority of scientists recognises 1922 5 and 1925 6 last in party activity eserov in territory of Russia, and the beginning of 1950th is considered end of their existence in emigration. In our opinion, arrest in 1925 of last structure of Central bureau PSR is not the proof of the valid existence eserovskoj parties in Russia, therefore we were limited 1922, when The culmination of history PSR - litigation against visible eserov has taken place. The basic layer of the literature on a considered theme also is devoted this period. From the point of view of a historiographic material the given dissertation covers the period 1901 - 2004 the Choice of initial date of work is caused by occurrence of the first publications about Party of the socialists-revolutionaries written by representatives of conservative, liberal and socialist camp. In the literature of this period the reasons of occurrence PSR were characterised, its social base and theoretical bases, were mentioned tactics and financing questions. Conclusions of some authors have put in pawn approaches to a theme, the general tonality, terminology and the characteristic, having made essential impact on all subsequent historiography of Party of socialists - of revolutionaries. In a modern historical science the fair attention to the question is brought: whether it is possible to consider set of judgements of contemporaries about events and the phenomena which witnesses they were, high-grade "chapter 1" of a historiography, or it as though introduction to it, predystoriografija. Or any such certificate - a historical source and only, any a parity faktologii and interpretations, level of judgement of the facts, degree of influence of generalisations containing in a source on professional historians? Probably, it is necessary to write only about features of reflexion - primary and memoirs - two periods, pre-October and 1920th in which image dependence on the estimations given by contemporaries is till today notable. The final side of research is connected with the last on time works about eserah as in domestic, and a foreign historiography. It is possible to ascertain, that for the centenary period historians and publicists do considerable work on party studying eserov, powerful results are reached in collecting of an actual material, Various variants of the general concept of history PSR are presented.
Object of research in the present work are the published works on history of Party of socialists - of revolutionaries in which problems of creation are reflected, activity and ádestruction of this political organisation, and also process of accumulation of scientific knowledge on a theme. It basically the historical researches spent to Russia, the USA and G ermanii. As object of research the problematics and conceptual bases of works, conclusions, positions, opinions and estimations of scientists and the publicists specialising on studying of history of partijno-political activity of socialists - of revolutionaries acts. The term źpartijno-political activity╗ is widely used in philosophical and sociological works and means one of the higher displays of public self-organising and political culture of a society. Because narodnicheskoe the direction of a political life of Russia of the first quarter of XX century, is traditional assotsiiruemoe with party eserov, had multilayered character (the Union of socialists - of revolutionaries-extremists, Party of the left socialists - of revolutionaries-internationalists, It is national-socialist party), in the dissertation conclusions and judgements of historians on a problem are considered in комплексе7. Scientific novelty of research consists in the following: 1. For the first time on the basis of the various methodological Approaches and wide istochnikovom a material the complex analysis of the literature and process of studying of a large scientific problem - histories of Party of socialists - of revolutionaries is carried out. In a domestic and foreign historiography of similar generalising researches it was not spent. 2. For the first time integrirovanno the party history eserov in the conditions of autocracy, at a Post-Soviet stage, in an emigrant and foreign historiography that has allowed to investigate a problem of creation and activity PSR in a historical context is analyzed, to make comparative generalisations about ways, methods and achievements of historical knowledge at various political systems. 3. Are systematised developed in domestic and Foreign historiography theoretical concepts of Party of socialists-revolutionaries, are revealed their maintenance and specificity. 4. Unlike the predecessors focusing attention On historiographic illumination of fighting and terrorist activity of Central Committee PSR, capital eserovskih the organisations, the author expands a problematics of research at the expense of the analysis of publications concerning organizational-party building, Theoretical and mass propaganda activities of party, its financial and publishing, and also the regional literature. 5. For the first time in a complex influence of internal and external factors and conditions on intensity of scientific researches on a problem, their methodology and the organisation is analyzed. 6. Changes istochnikovoj bases of researches at different stages of studying of history PSR, including abroad come to light. 7. The competitor posesses a scientific priority in prosopograficheskom illumination of the researcher of history of Party of socialists-revolutionaries. On protection following substantive provisions of the dissertation are taken out: 1. In the course of formation and development of a domestic historiography of Party of socialists-revolutionaries five periods are allocated: 1 period - 1901-1917; 2 period - 1917-1920th; 3 period - the beginning the 1930-h-middle of 1950th; 4 period - the middle the 1950-h-end of 1980th; 5 period - the end of 1980th - on present time. In development of a foreign historiography of a problem two periods are established: 1 period - the beginning 1920 - the end of 1930th; 2 period - the beginning of 1950th - on present time. 2. The first attempts of illumination of occurrence and activity Parties of socialists-revolutionaries have been undertaken by representatives conservative, liberal and Socialist directions of public thought in the conditions of autocracy. Judgements of political opponents PSR have put in pawn a basis of steady representation about eserah as intelligentsko-terrorist organisation, in the theory of the concept of K.Marksa leaning against a revisionist direction and narodnicheskie projects of transformation of Russia. 3. In the conditions of rigid frameworks of official communistic ideology after October, 1917 there was a basic change in an estimation of role PSR in a political life of a society. If before overthrow of autocracy the party eserov was considered by Bolshevist analysts and publicists as a necessary and important component of a political life of the country, active though also unreliable owing to "conciliation", the participant of struggle against an imperial mode after liquidation of institute of multi-party system the status estimation of socialists-revolutionaries has been reduced to level of "politically-bankrupt persons" and has not allowed to recreate all-round history of party. 4. Intensity of research of history PSR was caused by set of various factors, basic of which have been connected with opposition of ideological concepts, political and social systems and, as a rule, were realised through system of the state orders. 5. In the conditions of one-party political system in the USSR, with its selective approach, in studying of history of party eserov themes connected with internal split PSR in 1917 and the characteristic of "counterrevolutionary" activity of socialists-revolutionaries in revolution and Civil war were priority. 6. In a modern Russian historiography pluralistic approaches affirm as an estimation eserovskogo movements, is put and a number of the new scientific problems allowing comprehensively to investigate history of Party of socialists - of revolutionaries, its conceptual bases, strategy and tactics questions, number and a social composition, reprisals of the authorities and "self-liquidation" process, activity eserov in emigration dares. 7. Emigrant and foreign researchers have created specific, but the inconsistent history PSR the image of socialists-revolutionaries defenders of the Russian peasantry both original socialists and democrats became which main lines, on the one hand, and with another - originators of disorder of the Russian state and tragedy of the people. 8. Experience of studying of Party of socialists-revolutionaries abroad proves fruitfulness of researches not only in Context of sociopolitical history, but also cultural history, microhistory and local history.
<< | >>
A source: Kononenko, Anatoly Anatolevich. Historiography of the creation and activities of the Socialist Revolutionary Party in the years 1901-1922. / Thesis / Tyumen - 2005. 2005

More on topic Chronological frameworks.:

  1. chronological and territorial frameworks of research
  2. ž 4.2. Chronological frameworks of research and a problem of synchronism of considered monuments.
  3. Chronological frameworks of research.
  4. chronological frameworks of dissertational work (1991 - 2012е)
  5. ž 5.7. Moving system during the first chronological period (II-IV centuries AD).
  6. ž 5.8. Moving system during the second chronological period (V-VIII centuries AD).
  7. Frameworks of interaction of anti-recessionary management and banking system re-structuring
  8. Section II. Methodological frameworks kognitivno-semiotics issleyodovanija a phenomenon evokativnosti
  9. 4.2. Interpretation of the received results on gidrokarbometoksilirovaniju oktena-1 in frameworks gidridnogo the mechanism
  10. 1.3. Research of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge in frameworks inferentsionnogo the approach
  11. features of transfer of terminological lexicon in texts of the diplomatic maintenance in frameworks lingvokulturologicheskogo the approach
  12. 1.2. A phenomenon of process of understanding with a support on vyvodnoe knowledge in frameworks koyognitivnogo directions in a science
  13. the basic approaches to definition of time frameworks and essence of modern international modes of protection and preservation of migrating kinds of wild animals
  14. opening of the national markets of public procurements in frameworks the North American agreement on free trade (NAFTA)
  15. Chapter 2. The analysis of topology of electronic density of molecules and radicals in frameworks źthe quantum theory of atoms in a molecule╗
  16. ž 3. The comparative analysis of legal nature of consolidated laws of the USA and various kinds of ordering in frameworks Continental law families
  17. features of the right regulation of public procurements in frameworks Association of the states of South East Asia (ASEAN) both other international organisations and the international integration associations of Pacific region
  19. the Conclusion
  20. a work General characteristic