<<
>>

3.4.2. Figurative signs of modern soldiers according to questioning

The phenomenon lingvokulturologicheskoj the competence formed kognitivnoj by model «the athlete - the modern soldier», is considered as a multicomponent set of language abilities, the skills demanded from cadets military high schools in their readiness for realisation of professional acts of different degree of complexity which are classified, on the one hand, by kinds of military activity, and on the other hand - on special and humanitarian disciplines of a military profile.

It is natural, that the science about language now leans against modern achievements of psychology, linguistics and adjacent sciences - psycholinguistics and kognitivnoj linguistics, seeing the problem in psychological "maintenance" of conditions of mastering of the native language and connecting this process with formation and development of the person [Bogin 1986: 96].

On the following question of the questionnaire: «In what difference of soldiers of Ancient Russia from soldiers of our days» cadets have answered with the developed image. Their reactions
It is possible to present in 17 blocks. The first block included 27 answers in which it is underlined, that differences are not present (there are no differences; distinctions are not present, that now and then protect Fatherland; the present soldier does not differ at all from soldiers of Ancient Russia; there are no differences, and now and then protect Fatherland; and now and then the purpose - protection; there are no the differences, everyone protected in due time the earth from aggressors; there are no differences, all protect Russian earth; the soldier remains always the soldier; in my opinion, the big difference is not present; has changed nothing; Anything. The purposes and principles remained the same. The soldier with pride and with resoluteness protects the people, the truth, history of ancestors; differences are not present, at all times soldiers were identical). 4 cadets have short answered «in all».

40 persons have specified in differences in arms and equipment (they have a horse, a board, a sword, a mace, onions; technical equipment; a difference in the reservation; in the modern technics; in development of arms; the weapon; difference in the weapon; soldiers of our time have fire-arms; in the modern world the soldier is is better protected, than in Ancient Russia, the regimentals are better, the weapon and the military technics is better; in the weapon; only in arms; difference in arms; more modern weapon; at soldiers of our time new powerful arms and the military technics; in equipment; equipment; are more equipped; a hardware; in modern protection; a banner; difference in equipment; in fighting force).

Thirty one cadet has specified in similarity and distinctions in spirituality (difference that conditions have changed, but spiritual qualities are not present; differences in mentality; that earlier soldiers struggled for the earth and the Tsar more sincerely; in Ancient Russia wars battled only for the sake of protection of the state, now it not absolutely so; were at war for the earth, for Russia, and now for money earlier; soldiers of Ancient Russia on the one hand were at war for the Fatherland, and on the other hand they searched for feats for themselves, and modern soldiers protect
Fatherland by orders, receiving a good monetary contentment; outlook, concept about the native land and a debt; spirit; various values; strength of mind; cultural wealth; in distinction of interests; it is more patriotichnosti; soldiers of Ancient Russia are capable of self-sacrifice; in various outlooks on life; in patriotic education; preparation of soldiers in Russia was based on respect for memory of ancestors; courage).

Twenty one cadet has seen distinction in tactics of conducting fight (differences only affect ways of conducting fight, but business the general; problems identical, but methods of performance others; correctness of conducting fight; ways of achievement of the purpose; other ways of conducting fight; in methods of conducting war; in tactics of conducting fight, the technician of conducting fight; fight conducting; difference in a way of conducting war; various ways of the decision of problems of the state; other conditions and tactics of conducting fight; modern soldiers have other ways of struggle and purpose achievement); nine - on distinctions in appearance (in modern regimentals; unless in appearance; soldiers of our days less large, but are more developed physically; earlier soldiers were stronger; appearance, soldiers of Ancient Russia were large and proof; modern soldiers not the appreciable; are not allocated from an environment).

Thirty six cadets have paid attention to distinctive features in formation and preparation (modern soldiers are obliged to be formed to seize modern methods of participation in war; they are comprehensively developed; universality; soldiers of our days differ erudition; from the modern soldier expect bolshego, and in modern circumstances should know 10 times more; the accent became on mind; in connection with new character of war the modern soldier should be cleverer; development means; now difference in military knowledge; preparation of soldiers in Russia began with a birth; soldiers of Ancient Russia were soldiers since the birth).

For 1 2 cadets professionalism (modern soldiers - professional military men became the important sign of difference between ancient and modern soldiers; are professional soldiers; soldiers of Ancient Russia were nonprofessional soldiers; preparation level; preparation; the modern soldier more qualified; now difference in ability to address with the weapon).

Physical strength - one more distinctive sign of athletes (ancient placed emphasis on force, now on dexterity, speed, endurance; they not athletes; difference in physical strength; it is physically developed; the accent became on force; that the main qualities of the ancient soldier in physical preparation; force does not vary centuries). In this sign have specified 1 9 cadets.

Five cadets have noticed, that soldiers of Ancient Russia and modern soldiers concern different time (differ only time; time; different time; lived during different epoch; a different time accessory).

Four have seen difference in responsibility of modern soldiers (in responsibility of modern soldiers as became more threats in the modern world, there are more than duties, the modern officer should support the status; in responsibility; responsibility for the acts and actions; that now our country has problems on defensibility of the country and on its maintenance), three - in new technologies (in technologies (2); other technologies), three more - in number of duties (it is more than duties), two have paid attention to discipline (soldiers of our days distsiplinirovanny, thanks to the established rules (charters); under the charter we live).

1 cadet has answered, having specified in change of physical qualities with skills - tactics: «Ancient placed emphasis on force, now on dexterity, speed, endurance», another - in readiness for self-sacrifice (Now there are less than the people, ready to give the life for the Native land), the third - in modern unity
Armies as there were intestine wars earlier, the fourth - in the status. One cadet has answered, that «differences insignificant». 20 cadets were at a loss to answer on the brought attention to the question.

The received results of the carried out research are shown in the table.

Table 18. Signs of difference of soldiers of Ancient Russia from modern soldiers

№№ Kognitivnye signs Kol-in %
1 In what 27 10,9 %
2 In all 4 1,7 %
3 In arms / equipment 40 16,2 %
4 In formation / to preparation 36 14,6 %
5 In spiritual qualities 31 12,6 %
6 In appearance 16 6,5 %
7 In physical strength 19 7,7 %
8 In professionalism 12 4,9 %
9 Differences in tactics of conducting fight 21 8,5 %
10 In technologies 3 1,2 %
11 In responsibility 4 1,6 %
12 In duties 3 1,2 %
13 In discipline 2 0,8 %
14 In unity 1 0,4 %
15 In the time period 5 2 %
16 In the status 1 0,4 %
17 Feat (now there are less than the people, ready to give the life for the Native land) 1 0,4 %
18 Differences insignificant 1 0,4 %

19 I am at a loss to answer 20 8 %
Total: 247 100 %

Let's bring results. The arms, equipment became the most important for cadets of military technical institute a distinctive sign of Russian soldiers of an antiquity and modern soldiers. 16,2 % have paid attention to it answering. For many cadets distinctions in spiritual qualities of soldiers became important - 12,6 % (here it is necessary to notice, that three from them have specified in similarity of spiritual qualities of soldiers in Russia and in Russia) have told about it. On changes in tactics of conducting fight have specified 8,5 %, in formation, preparation - 14,6 %, on professionalism - 4,9 %, on physical strength of athletes - 7,7 %.

About that differences are not present, 10,9 % of cadets accepting in questioning have answered. Have experienced difficulties at the answer to this question of the interrogated of 8 %.

<< | >>
A source: BODRIKOV Alexey Borisovich. LINGUO-CULTUROLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE MENTAL EDUCATION STRUCTURE OF A WARRIOR (BASED ON THE QUESTIONANT ANALYTICAL COURSES OF MILITARY-TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY). Thesis for the degree of candidate of philological sciences. Tver - 2019. 2019

More on topic 3.4.2. Figurative signs of modern soldiers according to questioning:

  1. 3.4.1. Figurative signs of soldiers-athletes according to questioning
  2. 2.4.2. Figurative signs of modern soldiers
  3. 2.4.1. Figurative signs of soldiers-athletes
  4. Figurative signs kontsepta the house on questioning materials
  5. 3.4. Figurative signs kontsepta the soldier according to questioning
  6. 2.2.1. Figurative signs kontsepta the house
  7. figurative signs kontseptov the moon and Mond
  8. 3.2. Conceptual signs kontsepta the house on questioning materials
  9. the Chapter III. FIGURATIVE And SYMBOLICAL SIGNS makrokontsepta CHILDREN
  10. 3.4. Symbolical signs on questioning materials
  11. 3.2. Conceptual signs kontsepta the soldier according to questioning
  12. 2.4. Figurative signs kontsepta the soldier