<<
>>

Conclusions

Generalising results of supervision over features free upotyoreblenija omokompleksa "so", we will short formulate conclusions.

1. The pronominal adverb "so" (semisignificant and nepolnoznach - noe, in a word-korreljata role), called "dejktikom", contains in itself the diversified shades of index value.

It specifies for a known image, a way of action, circumstance, a situation; on sign degree; on compatibility of actions; on fulfilment beznamerennyh actions; on obych - nost the phenomena and their not realised reason, etc. Depending on variously - go a syntactic environment the pronominal adverb "so" carries out ana - foricheskuju and kataforicheskuju functions, at times combining them. Incorporating to various parts of speech, the pronominal adverb "so" keeps the se - mu ukazatelnosti. Polyfunctionality of this element is shown and at level of communicatively-pragmatical syntax. The Dejktichesky place - a nominal adverb is defined through participants of the speech certificate with on - power of degree vydelennosti object, index gesture speaking, etc. « So »in a role of a pronominal adverb carries out referential and metarefe - rent functions, is a part lokutivnogo and illokutivnogo certificates, is - uses in prolokutivnoj functions, finds out some features diktumnogo and modusnogo offer maintenances.

2. The word "so" is diverse proves and as a particle, being used in index, vydelitelno-restrictive, define - telno-specifying, intensifying, affirmative, negative, vopro - sitelnom, is affirmative-interrogative, exclamatory values, in a role of designers peresprosov and reciprocal repetitions, in structure emotsional - but-expressional particles.

"So" is capable to function and in a role of a copular particle, soyovmeshchajushchej in itself signs of the union (sheaf) and a particle. Designs with eleyomentom "so" as not verbal sheaf represent sintaksiyocheskie phraseological units.

During long development of language the investigated word finally has turned in aggljutinativnyj an appendage of meaning-bearing words and became an affix "taki", standing on border between usual slovoobrazovayotelnymi affixes and the separate words, a part of funktsioyonalno-hybrid words.

3. Being used as separate independent and kommuniyokativno the finished offer in a role of an affirmative component, and also for a designation of absence of any attributive subject of thought, for a designation of character of action or a condition in value ' nicheyogo the especial; unimportant ' "so" incurs functions of a reciprocal word.

4. "So" possesses the big possibilities, being samostojatelyonym the union. With its help designs with values sledyostvija are formed, the understanding conclusion ("means"), actually opposition and opposing accentuation.

5. "So" is capable to carry out function and a parenthesis, to be komyoponentom vvodno-modal words and combinations, to participate in formation of plug-in designs, representing itself as their obligatory anaforicheyoskogo an element, it is free (and svjazanno) to be used in a role of an interjection and zvukopodrazhanija. In certain situational conditions speech realizayotsy "so" serves as the spokesman of modal relations. By means of a particle, an interjection, reciprocal and a parenthesis "so", an affix "taki", partial, mezhdometnyh and vodno-modal combinations to an element "so" the subjective modality is realised.

6. Possibilities of a transposition of a word "so" in various parts of speech speak sinkretizmom this word, combination of signs full-znachnosti and nepolnoznachnosti, signs of various classes of nepolnoznach th words, instability of the morphological nature that leads opyo

redelennym to difficulties of an establishment of morphological qualification danyonogo words.

7. Supervision over a paralinguistic context funktsioniroyovanija words "so" allow to draw following conclusions. The word "so" javljayoetsja fonatsionnym, kinetic, graphic paralinguistic means, can be "screen" with which help deviate from prjayomogo the answer. Replacing gesture, a pose, a mimicry, it facilitates to users jazyyoka to process the nonverbal information.

<< | >>
A source: ZAVJAZKINA Irina Nikolaevna. SEMANTIC, GRAMMATICAL And FUNCTIONAL FEATURES of the WORD "SO" In MODERN RUSSIAN. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Phil.Sci. Stavropol -. 2003

More on topic Conclusions:

  1. CONCLUSIONS ON CHAPTER 1
  2. Conclusions
  3. Conclusions
  4. Conclusions
  5. conclusions
  6. Conclusions
  7. Conclusions
  8. conclusions
  9. CONCLUSIONS
  10. conclusions
  11. Conclusions
  12. conclusions
  13. Conclusions