<<
>>

THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK

In introduction the work urgency, its scientific novelty, object and an object of research are described, defined its purpose and problems, the material and research methods are characterised, the substantive provisions which are taken out on protection are formulated, theoretical and practical value of work is designated, results of its approbation are specified.

In the Chapter I «Research kontseptov from positions lingvokulturologii» theoretical bases are described

lingvokulturologicheskogo studying of mental formation the house. Knowledge of people of the objective validity are organised in a kind kontseptov - the abstract mental structures reflecting various fields of activity of the person. One of the first began to describe knowledge with the help kontseptov members of group «Logic analysis of language», rukovodimoj N.D.Arutjunovoj. kontseptov within the limits of the mentality theory professor V.V. Kolesov is engaged in studying. Kontsept - the thought tool, and it distinguishes «national character of its display and long duration of preservation as sign of national culture» [Kolesov 2004, with. 23].

Mental formation the house concerns key components of any conceptual system expressing national culture and mentality, a human life corresponding with such important spheres, as spiritual, psychological, educational, educational. Concentrating in itself moral values lingvokulturnoj a generality, the house represents a certain reference point in knowledge of the national mentality, accumulating in itself the major concepts material (artefaktnoj) and spiritual culture of the people.

The studying history kontsepta totals the house little bit more pjatnadtsatiletija. Recently there was a number of the works devoted to this mental formation.

In the linguistic literature mental formation the house was object of studying of some works: the conceptual sphere "house" was considered by E.M.Vereschagin and V.G.Kostomarov in work «the House of life of language. In search of new ways of development lingvostranovedenija: the concept logo-epistemy» (2000), lexico-semantic relations of words in limits kontsepta "House" [by D.R.Valeev 2011 have been described; Valgamova 2007], this mental formation was studied within the limits of comparison equivalent kontseptov Russian and English of languages [Medvedev 2001], comparisons with others kontseptami Russian (kontsept the HOUSE/NATIVE LAND [Gabdullina 2004], kontsept the HOUSE is described in conceptual sphere DAILY OCCURRENCE [CHulkina 2003]), as well as giperkontsept the Family/house - Family/Home in Russian and English lingvokulturah [Kostrubina 2011], in aspect of intercultural communications (kontsept the HOUSE as means of research of an art picture of the world of Virginia Woolf [Bogatova 2006]), in an art discourse [Lansky 2005; Feshchenko 2005; Rudnev 2009; Sleptsova 2009; Bazylova 2010], at level of phraseology and paremiologii [TSivjan 1978; Svitsova 2005; Whether 2006; Timoshchenko 2007; Glozman 2010], in frameworks metaforologii [Pimenova 2004], in aspect of national languages and cultures [Bulgakov 2003; Dmitriev 201 2; Kosintseva 2010; poljakova 2004; Solovar, Vylla 2010], within the limits of English and Russian folklore pictures of the world and ballads [Filippova 2001], from positions of semantic features of a terminological field «the house / habitation» in English and Russian languages [Duksova 2006], in creativity of the German writer of G.Byollja [ponomareva 2019].

The research history kontsepta the house in domestic linguistics has been stated in work: [potpot 2013].

As we see, mental formation the house became frequent enough object of research. However from positions of its complex studying in aspect of a reconstruction of its full structure in Russian language picture of the world this mental formation was not analyzed. The obtained data were not compared with results of the questioning spent among young native speakers of Russian. This kontsept develops in time. And from a position of its development kognitivnyh signs for rather small time interval - about volume of one generation - this kontsept did not become object of separate research.

In separate paragraphs of the head questions antropotsentricheskogo the approach to the description of language and a language picture of the world, about interrelation of language and culture are considered, various interpretation of the key term - kontsept are resulted. Kontsept the house concerns the category key in Russian language picture of the world knowingly. It is caused by its high value since such associations are connected with the house at Russian people, as the Native land, a family, parents, children, a shelter - all the most expensive to the person, standing on a national scale of values on one of the first places: the house theme is closely connected with many parties of a human life.

The review of modern researches testifies that kontsept as any widely used term, is defined is diverse, is sometimes inconsistent. Proceeding from definition of the given term, the technique of its description is under construction. In Russia the different technique of studying kontseptov is a lot of schools and directions, at all. In the majority of researches lingvokulturnogo directions kontsept, defined as conditional mental unit which is directed on complex studying of language, consciousnesses and cultures [Karasik, Slyshkin 2001], concerns the phenomena of culture and V.V. Vorobev, V.I.Karasik, JU.S.Stepan, etc.] is understood as difficult, multicomponent, "multilayered" formation [Of this year Vorkachev, . A.A.Zalevsky under kontseptom understands «objectively existing in consciousness of the person pertseptivno - kognitivno-affective formation of dynamic character unlike concepts and values as products of the scientific description (konstruktov)» [Zalevsky 2001, with. 39]. General of the resulted definitions is that: 1) kontsept concerns a mental field of activity of the person; 2) kontsept it is defined by a set kognitivnyh signs; 3) kognitivnye signs kontsepta form a certain structure (and the structure always assumes hierarchy).

In the given research, after M.V.Pimenovoj, under kontseptom a certain representation about a fragment of the world or a part of such fragment, having the difficult structure expressed by groups of signs, realised in the various language ways and means »[Pimenova 2007], it« representation about a world fragment (an image, idea, a symbol) which is formed by the national signs supplemented with signs of individual experience and personal imagination »[Pimenova 2011] is understood« «. The choice of leading definition of the term kontsept corresponds to logic of carried out research.

According to scientists, the typology kontseptov is various. So, for example, allocate: 1) cultural kontsepty (ethnocultural, sotsiokulturnye, individual - V.I.Karasik), 2) "kontsepty-codes" (V.I.Karasik), 3) base kontsepty, kontsepty-descriptors and kontsepty-reljativy (M.V.Pimenova); 4) national kontsepty (V.V. Krasnyh), 5) «kontsepty - maxima», «kontsepty - minima» (A.Vezhbitskaja), 6) kontsepty - representations, the scheme, concept, the frame, the scenario, a Gestalt (Z.D.popova, I.A.
Sternin), 7) borrowed kontsepty (zero, kvazi-kontsepty, parasitic, another's chastnootsenochnye - V.I.Karasik).

The special attention in work is given a question to a technique of research of conceptual structure. To describe kontsept it is necessary through reconstruction of its structure. The first stage of studying of conceptual structure occurs on the basis of the analysis of corresponding articles of authoritative dictionaries of Russian: sensible, etymological, istorikoyoetimologicheskih. In dictionaries at reprezentanta kontsepta in this kind and sememes motivating signs (in etymological and istorikoyoetimologicheskih dictionaries) and conceptual signs (in explanatory dictionaries) are specified. Allocation of the others kognitivnyh signs - figurative and symbolical - occurs on a material from the National case of Russian, in contexts (words and word-combinations) with included reprezentantom investigated kontsepta its environment is analyzed.

In the chapter II «Kontsept the house in Russian language picture of the world» are in detail described motivating, conceptual, figurative and symbolical kognitivnye signs investigated kontsepta. The table where statistical data of the carried out research are specified is resulted In each of the above-named groups of signs.

The first stage of studying of structure kontsepta - definition of its motivating signs. «Such sign which has formed the basis for imenovanija a certain fragment of the world is called as motivating, it is the internal form of a word» [Pimenova 2007]. The internal form of a word is pervopriznak with which development of a primary image just as from a seed grows morfologicheski a difficult plant begins. Motivating signs are taken from corresponding articles of etymological dictionaries.

At kontsepta the house 8 motivating signs have been allocated. It is connected by that a word the house ancient - according to etymological dictionaries, it has indoevropejskie roots. This word in different oglasovkah meets in different European languages. In XI century in Old Russian language this word had some values. Sinkretizm mental formation the house consists in association of several concepts - external shape (‘ a structure / a building ’), internal space (‘ dwelling / a shelter ’), those who constantly occupies it spaces (a family / house ’), the rendered habitable space (‘ the house device ’), that is of value (‘ a manor / property ’), transferred from generation in generation (‘ a sort ’), a life (‘ an economy ’), a cult / spiritual part of a life (‘ a temple ’).

As the most frequency motivating signs investigated kontsepta act ‘ a structure / a building ’ (44,4 %) and ‘ dwelling / a shelter ’ (32,3 %). Average rate signs ‘ a family / house ’ (9,8 %) and ‘ a manor / property ’ (4,9 %) possess. Signs ‘ a sort ’ (3,4 %), ‘ an economy ’ (3,1 %), ‘ the house device ’ (0,2 %), ‘ a temple ’ (2 %) differ low rate. To it there is a number of explanations. The life has changed. Families began to live separately, not lodging sorts.
Rate of a life leads to absence of time for housekeeping conducting. Churches seldom are called as houses divine, and molelnye houses are little-known to wide layers of native speakers.

The methodology of research of conceptual signs occurs under the following scheme: 1) definition of signs on the basis of dictionary definitions of the core reprezentanta kontsepta, 2) revealing of these signs in language a material from the National case of Russian, 3) definition of communication with motivating signs, 4) the statistical analysis of rate of actualisation of these signs in a language material.

The conceptual are understood «as signs kontsepta, staticized in dictionary values in the form of semantic components (this and sememes) words - reprezentanta kontsepta» [Pimenova 2007]. For definition of conceptual signs data of 4 authoritative explanatory dictionaries of modern Russian are involved.

In total at studied kontsepta the house 13 conceptual signs were revealed. Most frequency of them till now there are signs: ‘ (inhabited/office) building / a structure ’ (39,3 %), ‘ an inhabited premise / apartment / the habitation ’ (28,8 %), ‘ the people living together; a family ’ (8,7 %), were motivating ‘ a structure / a building ’, ‘ dwelling / a shelter ’ and ‘ a family / house ’ (accordingly).

Average rate is noted at conceptual signs ‘ a manor / property ’ (4,4 %), ‘ establishment (having cultural value or devoted to what-l memory. The historical person) ’ (4,3 %), ‘ an institution, the enterprise / establishment (serving any social needs) ’ (3,9 %), ‘ a reigning sort, a dynasty ’ (3 %), ‘ an economy (separate) family ’ (2,8 %), ‘ a temple ’ (1,8 %), ‘ tenants, (living in a building) ’ (1,4 %), ‘ the country / the Native land ’ (1,4 %). Low rate distinguishes a sign ‘ a place (constant) residing of the person, (characterised by certain relations and a way of life) ’ (motivir. ‘ the house device ’) (0,2 %).

The third analysis stage of structure kontsepta the house - definition of its figurative signs according to the National case of Russian.

Investigated kontsepta it is possible to present figurative signs in the form of two blocks: signs of the lifeless nature and wildlife. Figurative signs are presented in subgroups of signs of elements, substances, vegetative, subject, zoomorfnyh, vitalnyh, antropomorfnyh signs. Signs of elements and substance are rather not numerous. The house of the person is compared to dwelling of animals and birds - a nest, a hole. Signs live beings and antropomorfnye, created on a principle metonimicheskogo carrying over became the most frequency among figurative. Turns on itself variety of subject metaphors in which the house is compared or assimilates to various artefacts.

The fourth analysis stage of structure kontsepta the house - revealing of its symbolical signs. The house symbolises whole space. Symbolical signs of the house correspond with the mythological. The most frequency
Actualisations of such signs, as ‘ a window ’ (24,5 %), ‘ the furnace ’ (22,7 %), ‘ a roof ’ (14,5 %), ‘ a door ’ (11,3 %), ‘ a corner ’ (9,5 %), ‘ a threshold ’ (4,7 %), ‘ a fence ’ (3,4 %), ‘ a court yard ’ (2,9 %), ‘ an arch ’ (2,3 %), ‘ gate ’ (2,1 %) act. Symbolical signs ‘ a gate ’ (0,9 %), ‘ a ladder ’ (0,5 %), ‘ a porch ’ (0,4 %), ‘ a well ’ (0,3 %) have low degree of actualisation.

The house in Russian lingvokulture symbolises riches, a prosperity, well-being. On these signs specify as in its external attributes, and etazhnost, internal space, and also such qualities of the house, as a microclimate, presence of a family, the family. Earlier in Russia the riches of a family "were read" in number of windows in the house - the more windows, the richer the house. Now the riches sign "is read" in it etazhnosti. The riches of the house, in any case, associate with its sizes. This sign is staticized by a verb otgrohat (Well and dominu you to itself otgrohal! - has told Kostja when Lukas has got into a cabin. Azarov. The suspect).

The symbolical sign ‘ well-being ’ associates with an investment of means in the real estate (he has earned All these apartments, houses and expensive cars fairly, and to its well-being many envied. Remizov. Will a manumission). Absence of well-being is not only a lack of means of subsistence, but also an adverse climate of the house (it is final, became disturbing - the house at us, know, not so safe, differently happens. Senchin. The lodger with two children). In other cultures - other symbols of well-being of the house (Peonies by the Japanese and Chinese tradition bore happiness, love and well-being in the house. Andreeva. Assemblage dots).

Kognitivnyj a sign ‘ the riches ’ describe palaces and houses of those who is provided (Tsars, commanders and valets in rich houses, - have answered Pawnshops, - at us, whether know, more and more about Ostrovsky, merchants there... Bulgakov. Notes of the dead man). The rich house are a mansion (Inhabitants we. - the inhabitant, and domina - a mansion, - has grinned the soldier. Vasilev. The house which was constructed by the Grandfather). In such house it is a lot of rooms (Domina - rooms, likely, from eight. In a court yard "Volga" costs. Shukshin. The master).

Opposition to this sign the sign ‘ makes poverty ’ (We happened in rich and poor houses, entered everywhere, beginning from a lavatory of the beauty to kitchen in hotel, to shelters of even more prosaic. Druzhinin. Russian in Japan in the end of 1853 and in the beginning of 1854). The family tries to keep the good house, despite loss of means (People they were rather poor; their house, rather ancient, wooden, but convenient, stood on a grief, between the decayed garden and an overgrown court yard. Turgenev. Hamlet ShChigrovskogo of district). Poverty of the house "is read" in its names (a shanty/hibarka, a house, a shed, razvaljuha and under.) . In Russian, French and German lingvokulturah poverty did not mean absence of books in the house (I have come to it, in a poor room on a top of the French house where there was a bed, a table, a stool and some books. Metropolitan Antony. About death; many thousand German poor men had houses small bibliotechki, entertaining them «a minute of a life difficult». Goljandin. Germany and England). The external shape of the house can be
Deceptive (In appearance a small house - usual razvaljuha, and you will enter - anything, strong still domina and as downwards you will go down, on a short flight of stairs derevjannenkoj - there and in general beauty. Big fishes. Last game). Poverty is a lack of monetary resources, but nevertheless cleanliness (There was in the house a poverty. Such invisible, clean poverty, shortage, constraint. Gippius. The thoughtful wanderer).

Kognitivnyj a sign ‘ the luxury ’ associates with the sizes of the constructed house (In the end of its its attention the magnificent bulk eight-story, probably has involved, just constructed house. Bulgakov. The master and Margarita). This supervision concerns not only to Russian lingvokulture (compare: Here it is possible to see both magnificent skyscrapers, and accurate Asian poverty of traditional two-storeyed houses. The Sokolov-Mitrich, Victor Djatlikovich. A miracle Korean). Luxury its ornaments - caryatids give to the house, bay windows (I for the last some months have begun to hate This magnificent ancient merchant house of a century before last to a shiver together with all accursed caryatids, together with bay windows. Kramer. About wanderers and wanderers), internal premises (For the Petersburg shop a little coarse house with huge figures of the Greek gods - patrons of trade and crafts - on a facade has been specially built in the city centre, on Neva, opposite to a monument to Catherine II, with a magnificent trading hall inside - vysotoju in two floors. Muraveva. And To °). The magnificent house is not always hospitable (Sensation of confusion and confusion the melancholy and desire to leave this magnificent house have superseded. Pozdnyakov. Another's supper).

The cult of ancestors occurring at Slavs, defined communication between a prosperity in the house and the ancestor of a family. «Well-being of the house and an economy depends also on house-spirits who live in each house under the furnace or under a threshold. At the Balkan Slavs the patron of an apartment house, as well as any structure, the spirit occurring from a shade immured at building of the person or an animal, or even the most live a being (bolg can act., maked. talasam, talason, etc.) . Among representatives of fauna the patron of the house the snake, (is more rare - caress) »[the Encyclopedia of symbols and signs] is considered. In an antiquity studied kontsepta specifies one more fact of Russian culture: on a next world died keeps within in domovinu, i.e. to the dead person its relatives build the separate house. The cult of ancestors proves to be true also a double word meaning домина:1. The big house (you See, on most juru domina! In any city on good street to put it is not a shame. Bazhov. Through mezhu). 2. A coffin (He looked in a tomb, creaked hardly an audible voice: - Here and domina rich... Put me faced to the east. Shishkov. It is gloomy-river).

Table 1. Riches and well-being signs kontsepta the house

№№ Riches and well-being signs Kol-in examples %
1. ‘ poverty ’ 59 19 %
2. ‘ well-being ’ 54 18 %
3. ‘ riches ’ 134 44 %
4. ‘ luxury ’ 56 19 %
Total: 303 100 %

Apparently from table 1, the most frequency sign kontsepta the house in the collected language material is ‘ riches ’ (44 %). Signs ‘ well-being ’, ‘ luxury ’ and ‘ poverty ’ are presented approximately by identical quantity of actualisations.

Value of the house, it sakralnost is connected with lingvokulturoj Russian people. The house - one of the most valuable properties of the person. The house symbolises the native centre, members of household: grandfathers and grandmothers, mother, the father, sons and daughters - baby birds who will flutter out from a parental nest. House construction in Russian culture has been connected with ceremonial practice.

The chapter III «Structure kontsepta the house according to questioning of young native speakers of Russian» is devoted the detailed analysis of questionnaires interrogated and to comparison of the received data to what are resulted in the second chapter of work. In the third chapter are compared motivating, conceptual, figurative and symbolical kognitivnye signs investigated kontsepta in Russian language picture of the world and in questionnaires of young native speakers of Russian - cadets of military construction institute of St.-Petersburg. Tables where quantity indicators of the carried out research are specified are resulted in all groups of signs.

Russian language picture of the world represents rich structure studied kontsepta which includes a wide feature set - motivating, conceptual, figurative and symbolical. 8 motivating signs, 13 conceptual, 6 groups of figurative signs (signs of elements, substance, subject, vegetative, vitalnyh, antropomorfnyh), 3 symbolical signs are allocated: 1) landscape and climatic signs. 2) symbolics of parts of the house. 3) riches and prosperity symbol.

Comparison of the received data to motivating signs has shown the following. From allocated in Russian language picture of the world 8 motivating signs young men in the questionnaires have mentioned all: ‘ dwelling / a shelter ’ (27,3 %), ‘ a family / house ’ (23,3 %), ‘ a structure / a building ’ (14,7 %), ‘ an economy ’ (11,6 %), ‘ the house device ’ (10 %), ‘ a sort ’ (9 %), ‘ a manor / property ’ (2,8 %) and ‘ a temple ’ (1,3 %).

From 13 conceptual signs kontsepta the house by the questioned have been staticized 10: ‘ an inhabited premise / apartment / the habitation ’ (21,8 %), ‘ the people living together; a family ’ (motivir. ‘ a family / house ’) (18,5 %), ‘ the country / the Native land ’ (12 %), ‘ (inhabited/office) building / a structure ’ (11,8 %), ‘ an economy (separate) family ’ (9,3 %), ‘ tenants, (living in a building) ’ (8,3 %),‘место (constant) residing of the person, (characterised by certain relations and a way of life) ’ (8 %), ‘ a reigning sort, a dynasty ’ (7 %), going back to the motivating; ‘ a manor / property ’ (2,3), ‘ a temple ’ (1 %).

3 conceptual signs: ‘ establishment (having cultural value or devoted to what-l memory. The historical person) ’, ‘ the institution, the enterprise / establishment (serving any social needs) ’, ‘ a small house (a place where on game rules it is impossible to pursue) ’ in questionnaires have not met
Because of nevostrebovannosti these signs in connection with age and experience of the interrogated. This results from the fact that in modern language consciousness of young native speakers a word the house does not associate with a public institution, the enterprise or establishment - they still have not enough occurrence experience in these structures and social institutes. Cultural institutions and public institutions are perceived as public buildings and offices, instead of houses. Children's games by cadets seriously are not perceived and owing to age are forgotten.

The conceptual sign ‘ (inhabited/office) building / a structure ’ in RJAKM almost in 3 times meets in the collected language material, rather than in answers interrogated (39,3 % in RJAKM and 11,8 %), a sign ‘ an inhabited premise / apartment / the habitation ’ (motivir is more often. ‘ dwelling / the shelter ’) is approximately equally staticized in a language material (28,8 %) and in questionnaires of young native speakers (21,8 %).

Return law is observed concerning a conceptual sign ‘ the people living together; a family ’ which in questionnaires of young men dominates (18,5 % of actualisations in questionnaires and 8,7 % - in RJAKM). The Same picture is observed concerning a sign ‘ a reigning sort, a dynasty ’ (7 % in questionnaires of young native speakers and 3 % in RJAKM). One part of the interrogated perceives itself still as children which house is there where their parents about what they directly write in the questionnaires. It speaks young age of the interrogated. Other part of young native speakers of older years has created the families.

Figurative signs kontsepta the house in questionnaires of young men as have the distinctive features. High rate differ such vitalnye signs, as ‘ force / power ’ (2,7 %), ‘ returning ’ (2,1 %), ‘ a birth ’ (2,1 %), ‘ a dream ’ (2,1 %), pertseptivnye signs: ‘ touch ’ (26,3 %), ‘ feeling ’ (44,4 %), ‘ sight ’ (6,3 %), ‘ taste ’ (4,2 %), ‘ sense of smell ’ (3,5 %), ‘ hearing ’ (3,5 %).

During the analysis of questionnaires it was revealed, that young native speakers supplement some groups of signs with the. So, in group antropomorfnyh signs they have allocated a sign ‘ will ’, however the sign ‘ destiny ’ for them has appeared is not claimed. For interrogated by the most accented the steels antropomorfnye interpersonalnye signs (59 %), and also emotivnye signs (21,2 %) and signs of employment (only 2,8 %, from them ‘ rest ’ occupies a sign 1,7 %), appeared more frequency in questionnaires interrogated in comparison with corresponding signs in Russian language picture of the world. The house for young native speakers associates with such kognitivnymi signs, as ‘ relationship ’ (34,2 %), ‘ friendship ’ (5,7 %), ‘ expectation ’ (5,4 %), ‘ protection ’ (5 %), ‘ support ’ (2,2 %), ‘ hospitality ’ (2 %). Emotivnymi reactions of young men to a word the house were ‘ love ’ (5,6 %) and ‘ calmness ’ (5,6 %), ‘ pleasure ’ (4,1 %).

Actual for young men there were symbolical signs ‘ the world ’ (37,4 %) and ‘ a climate ’ (36 %), absent as signs kontsepta the house in Russian language picture of the world. For the house at young native speakers of Russian the important signs of a steel ‘ an oasis ’, ‘ a cave ’, ‘ the nature ’, ‘ a field ’, ‘ the rivers ’.
Signs ‘ a chasm ’, ‘ bowels of the Earth ’ have not met among reactions in questionnaires interrogated. House space was embodied in consciousness of young native speakers through earth signs - a landscape - and a climate.

House details in questionnaires of young native speakers "are traced" in detail: in questionnaires 10 signs of parts of the house instead of 14, noted in language examples from the National case of Russian are specified. Young native speakers pay attention not only to the important components of external shape of the house, but also its internal filling (‘ an arch ’, ‘ a bathroom ’, ‘ a door ’, ‘ a court yard ’, ‘ a roof ’, ‘ a ladder ’, ‘ a window ’, ‘ the furnace ’, ‘ a threshold ’, ‘ a corner ’). Modern use was left by significant symbols of the house: ‘ gate ’, ‘ a fence ’, ‘ a gate ’, ‘ a well ’, ‘ a porch ’, instead of a bath in houses have appeared bathrooms.

It testifies to essential transformations in strukturnoyosemanticheskih characteristics kontsepta the house which are caused "professionalizatsiej" kognitivnoj world pictures. For cadets voennoyotehnicheskogo the high school, specialising in building and having an operational experience in concrete industrial sphere, actual for the ordinary, "naive" consciousness, the generalised semantic characteristics of the house appear not such important, as the characteristics connected with professional work. Concrete design features of the house as structures, constructions start to take not less important place among verbalizatorov kontsepta, than traditional, common cultural.

So, the house for them it not the centre, but a construction, a structure intended for residing of people (simultaneously is concretised, becomes is more pragmatic-focused and function), is a new building; a building design with accurate morphological characteristics: walls, a roof, windows, the basis, a door, the base, a verandah, a drawing room, a flue, rooms, the lift, a pipe, a toilet, a bathroom, a beam, baljasina, bars, a capital, moulding, support, overlappings, a profile, rafters, a facade. Representation about a material from which the house is constructed changes also. On change to an obobshchenno-uncertain stone and a tree the brick, concrete and ferro-concrete (last from the listed materials it is difficult to present as a sign kontsepta the house, generated by naive consciousness) come.

Among motivating signs of the house builders distinguish "wear resistance" that there is exclusively functional characteristic, actual only for the professional.

As a whole, dynamics kontsepta the house, connected with it "professionalizatsiej", can be presented as aktsentuatsija its constructive characteristics at a reduction national, obobshchennoyoobraznyh. Certainly, definitive conclusions concerning given dynamics can be made on the basis of more detailed researches, but already at this stage becomes obvious, that kontsept in the professional environment finds lines konstrukta as result and the form of the scientific, technical, professionally focused object semantizatsii.

Simultaneously, "immersing" kontsepta on Wednesday of professionals allocates with its lines of "kontsepta-maximum", unlike more widespread, professionally not focused «kontsepta a minimum» (A.Vezhbitskaja) more peculiar to naive, ordinary consciousness.

The house as on biographical particulars in research has shown riches and prosperity symbol following data. The scale of value investigated kontsepta is stretched from signs maloimushchestva to luxury.

The sign ‘ poverty ’ is realised by means of different nouns (a hut (41), It's not my business; a log hut (6); the log hut corners is not red, and is red pies (3); a hovel (2); a tilt cart; a peasant house; a hut (9), a dugout; mud huts; a tent; sharaga) and adjectives as a part of proverbs (the Log hut, the more poorly, the is more crowded (2)). Quantity of reactions rather high.

The riches assume well-being: these of two sign are interfaced among themselves and difficultly razdelimy. A sign ‘ well-being ’ verbalizuetsja primordial words of Russian (a tower, teremok; manor (4); a mansion) and not only (hall).

The sign ‘ riches ’ is staticized by a corresponding epithet (rich (4)), and also the lexicon speaking another language marking modern realities (a cottage (3), a country house (2), a private residence (2); a country house (2); a sports hall (2); the fashionable; road;). This sign can be realised in the developed answers (warm (11), ornated, cool, habitual; well ventilated, beautiful, technological, expensive, strong; big, warm, favourite, magnificent, the best, remarkable; big, warm hospitable, favourite, the best, remarkable, magnificent, excellent, amazing, magnificent; big, cosy, multi-coloured, private, warm, expensive, pure; two-storeyed, with an exit on the south).

The sign ‘ luxury ’ concerns structures of "shouting" well-being (a palace (5); columns (5)). This sign rather seldom meets in questionnaires of young native speakers, as well as a sign ‘ security ’ (it is provided by the Internet (12); the place where there is everything, that is necessary for you).

Table 2. The comparative analysis of signs of riches and well-being

kontsepta the house in Russian language picture of the world and in questionnaires of cadets of military technical high school

№№ Riches and well-being signs Data in RJAKM (%) Data in questionnaires (%)
1. ‘ poverty ’ 19 % 65,8 %
2. ‘ well-being ’ 18 % 8,2 %
3. ‘ riches ’ 44 % 15 %
4. ‘ security ’ 0 % 1,4 %
5. ‘ luxury ’ 19 % 9,6 %
Total: 100 % 100 %

Cadets at present have two houses - parental in which they stay now only on a vacation, and present - the barracks estimated modestly in connection with restrictions, imposed according to the army regulations (65,8 %). The interrogated describe the parental and future house from positions of riches, luxury and well-being. In Russian language picture of the world bolshee the attention is given to houses rich, magnificent, allocated on the general background, symbolising a prosperity in a family.

In the Conclusion are summed up, results of the spent analysis are described, structural features kontsepta the house in Russian lingvokulture are defined, prospects of the further researches are specified.

<< | >>
A source: TIUNOVA Olga Vjacheslavovna. VERBAL DEMONSTRATION of MENTAL FORMATION the HOUSE ACCORDING TO DICTIONARIES And the REFERENCE To NATIVE SPEAKERS. The dissertation AUTHOR'S ABSTRACT on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Phil.Sci. Tver 2019. 2019

More on topic THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK:

  1. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  2. the Basic maintenance of work
  3. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  4. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  5. the BASIC MAINTENANCE of WORK
  6. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  7. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  8. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  9. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  10. II. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  11. the Basic maintenance of work
  12. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  13. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  14. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  15. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  16. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  17. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  18. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK
  19. THE BASIC MAINTENANCE OF WORK