>>

THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC

In 1973 authors of the key collective monography on linguistics methodology [the General linguistics 1973] admitted, that the domestic historical Russian philology avoids descriptions of the procedures and ways of studying of a material.

Four decades later at conferences and seminars of the All-Russia level («Russian and mentality in diahronii», Suzdal-Vladimir, 2017) is ascertained backlog diahronicheskih researches in the general-theoretical plan. "Rupture" comprehension is fixed and in directions of work of the International scientific symposium «RUSSIAN GRAMMAR 4.0» (Moscow, 2016) on which have been declared) a priority of the lichnostno-focused paradigm of Russian philology, actualisation of workings out in area germenevtiki and understanding problems, research of monuments and questions of a periodization of Russian. In the circumstances lingvopersonologicheskoe (G.I.Bogin, JU.N.sentr, V.P.Neroznak, E.V. Ivantsova and others) modelling on a material of texts of XVII century - one of necessary steps for overcoming of theoretical backlog diahronicheskoj Russian philology. All set resulted above the reasons defines an urgency of the offered dissertation.

Object of research - the Russian language person of the end XVI - the middle XVII столетий.1

Object of research - ojazykovlennye components of semantic system of Russian authors of XVII century involved in activity of translation, communications and interpretation.

The dissertation purpose - having developed model of the analysis of the language person in communicatively-mysledejatelnostnyh co-ordinates to apply it to research of the named texts of first half XVII century - the period sotsiokulturnogo crisis.

The research hypothesis - the language person of the certain period of a life of ethnos can be reconstructed on a material of the texts created by it which components participate in translation, communications, interpretation, forming special type of understanding of the validity.

The object in view defines the decision of following theoretical and applied problems.

1. To describe tendencies to concept promotion «the language person» as type of the person in researches personologicheskoj orientations, since the period dominating komparativistskoj paradigms in literature studying (XIX century) before occurrence of the first theoretical works (G.I.Bogin, JU.N.sentr). [1]

2. To fix constant (or identical) structures and designations in philological works XIX-XX of centuries.

3. To present updating of model of the language person for diahronicheskogo researches, having characterised methodology of application of the offered working out.

4. To take (according to offered strategy of modelling) from author's texts of first half XVII century difficult words and pojasnitelno-otozhdestvitelnye designs for definition of language and communicative preferences of the writing.

5. To analyse used in texts of language persons obraznoyosimvolicheskuju a component and paremii for their characteristic as constants (transferred, broadcast) / variables (situationally - caused by the communicative certificate) elements in investigated compositions.

6. To characterise (how much it the material) a statics and dynamics of semantic components of a picture of the world of ethnos as consequence of an involvement of each language person into activity of translation, communications and interpretation allows.

As material of research for chapter 1 philological and literary-critical texts XIX - the XX-th centuries (A.S.Shishkov, K.S.Aksakov, V.G.Belinsky, A.A.potebni, I.A.Boduena's compositions de Kurtene and others), for the second - 42 author's texts have served. 44 fragments have been chosen from the last with the syntactic designs including the unions "that is", "that is", and also 3117 uses of difficult words a minimum. As comparative sources of research following materials were involved.

1. «The Ostrozhsky Bible» 1581 - the publication which has occurred before church reform of patriarch Nikona, that is why corresponding to the valid circle of reading for the educated language person of first half XVII century.

2. «To lead the hand-written collection of proverbs XVI-XVII of centuries or proverbs vsenarodnejshie alphabetically», the published P.K.Simoni.

3. The Russian biographic dictionary - a series of books (25 volumes) with encyclopaedic data on creativity and a course of life of authors of the different epoch, A.A.polovtsova published under supervision.

Introduction of the given comparative sources speaks not only necessity of fixing of reproduced (broadcast) elements, for example, is figurative-symbolical system of Christianity and jazychestva, but also reconstruction experience «the potential thesaurus» (Vl. A.Lukov, the Shaft. A.Lukov) national culture through proverbs, and also aspiration to reveal stable components in the subject-subject interaction between historically kept away from each other kommunikantami (I.A.Boduen de Kurtene, G.P.Schedrovitsky, N.I.Gajnullina and others).

The basic methods of research according to a modern condition of methodology are subdivided on philosophical (from abstract to concrete, phenomenological) general scientific (modelling, the description), chastnonauchnye (biographic, germenevtichesky,

Supervision, the content-analysis, the contextual analysis). Receptions of comparison, continuous sample, elements of a technique of the analysis on directly making and the componental analysis are used.

The theoretical base was made by works of domestic scientists:

A. S.Shishkov, K.S.Aksakov, A.A.potebni, N.V.Krushevsky, I.A.Boduena de Kurtene, G.G.Shpeta, V.V. Vinogradova, L.P.Jakubinsky, B.A.Larin,

B. P.Timofeeva, G.P.Melnikova, B.A.Uspensky, JU.M.Lotman, V.M.Zhivova, I.A.Melchuka, J.S.Stepanova, G.P.Schedrovitsky, G.I.Bogina, J.N.Karaulova, E.S.Kubrjakovoj, E.V.Ivantsovoj and many other things.

Scientific novelty is defined by that for the first time A.S.Shishkov, V.G.Belinsky, N.G.Chernyshevsky, K.S.Aksakov, N.V.Krushevsky, G.G.Shpeta, I.A.Melchuka's works are entered into a context of formation of the theory of the language person. On the base of interpretation of their compositions, books and letters the variant linguistic epistemologii with the principles of fixing of dynamic processes (in co-ordinates of concepts of G.G.Shpeta - G.P.Schedrovitsky - G.I.Bogina) has been developed. Also concepts are entered into a scientific turn «correlative epistemologicheskaja pair», «komponentnoyosmyslovaja a category». In the dissertation for the first time are modelled 8 of 9 language persons presented in the second chapter, a number from which the connected contemporaries of the different social strata, different situations of activity that allows to reveal similarities and differences in the maintenance of reconstruction among themselves act not only as interlocutors, but also as oposredovanno.

The theoretical importance of the received results is caused by that the new approach to the description of formation of the private linguistic discipline is offered, leaning against history of formation of its key terminology and development of representations about structure of a word, language and consciousness. The language person of the period kept away on time is modelled with the account germenevticheskih workings out (G.G.Shpet, G.P.Schedrovitsky, G.I.Bogin). Also the dissertation brings the contribution to understanding of historical changes of leksiko-syntactic system as chronology of experience of value and assotsiirovannyh with it of forms their subject-carrier.

The practical importance of results is defined by that they can be used in proceedings and educational practice, manuals on linguistics, histories of Russian literary language, to the linguistic analysis of the text, leksikologii, lingvokulturologii, lingvopersonologii, psycholinguistics, kognitivnoj to linguistics, special courses on methodology and philological germenevtike.

On protection following positions of research are taken out.

1. As types of the person (literary, poetic, language), and three-and five-private structures in lingvopersonologii are broadcast case phenomena, that, on the one hand, eksplitsiruet their traditional character in relation to scientific humanitarian knowledge, and with another - is the fact linguistic epistemologii concrete discipline.

2. Formation lingvopersonologii from the middle of XIX century goes on three lines of the development including generating of interconnected correlative pairs: «type of the person» / «consciousness type», «the understanding organisation» / «the organisation govorenija», "germenevtika" / "philology".

3. The differentiation of Russian language persons of XVII century at diahronicheskom rather-comparative research, including within one social stratum, is possible at the complex methodological approach in which the case of difficult words, explanatory designs, paremii and an is figurative-symbolical component receive the status of alarm elements at modelling of the founder of the text of an analyzed time cut.

4. Komponentno-semantic categories of the Russian language person, being the phenomenon collectively-individual ("intersubektivnym"), act as potential units of an ethnic picture of the world, opredmechennye in resources of lexical and grammatical and stylistic systems.

5. Texts with encyclopaedic data on each Russian language person of first half XVII century represent result of the communicative certificate in which are broadcast not only sistemnoyojazykovye, but also komponentno-semantic components, organizujushchie secondary interpretation from the commentator.

Approbation and introduction of results passed at the International scientific conference «Young researchers - to regions» (Vologda, 2014; 2015); the International youth scientific forum "Lomonosov" (Moscow, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018); on the International scientific symposium «Russian grammar 4.0» (Moscow, 2016); at Inter-regional scientific conference within the limits of X Annual session of post-graduate students and young scientific (Vologda, 2016); at 9th International scientific conference «Pressing questions of philology and a technique of teaching of foreign languages» (St.-Petersburg, 2017); on XVIII All-Russia School-seminar young leksikologov, leksikografov and lingvogeografov «the Russian language person and its reflexion in various linguistic sources» (St.-Petersburg, 2017); On IX All-Russia School-seminar young leksikologov, leksikografov and lingvogeografov «Live speech and modern leksikologija, a lexicography and lingvogeografija» (St.-Petersburg, 2018), and also during total conference at improvement of professional skill at philological faculty RUDN within the limits of scientific training «the General and private methodology of a philological science» (Moscow, 2017).

The designated purposes and problems have defined work structure. Dissertational research consists of introduction, 2 heads, conclusions under heads, the conclusions, the list of the used literature (246 sources, including 7 on a foreign language), 4 appendices.

| >>
A source: ZAGUMENNOV Alexander Vladimirovich. the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE PERSON of FIRST HALF XVII CENTURY In ASPECTS of TRANSLATION, COMMUNICATIONS And INTERPRETATION (ON MATERIAL RAZNOZHANROVYH of TEXTS of the EPOCH). The dissertation author's abstract on competition of a scientific degree of a Cand.Phil.Sci. Tver - 2018. 2018

More on topic THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC:

  1. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  2. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  3. the WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  4. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  5. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  6. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  7. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  8. a work General characteristic
  9. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  10. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  11. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  12. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  13. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  14. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  15. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC
  16. THE WORK GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC